Literature DB >> 32981959

Can We Rely on the Activated Clotting Time to Measure Heparin Anticoagulation? A Clinical Evaluation of Two ACT Monitors.

Samuel Nilsson1, Micael Appelblad1, Staffan Svenmarker1.   

Abstract

The sensitivity to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is determined by patient-specific characteristics and is assessed by the whole blood activated clotting time (ACT). We aimed to examine reliability measures between two different ACT monitors using Bland-Altman analysis: bias should not exceed 50 ± 50 seconds for measurements performed during CPB or 10 ± 10 seconds before and after CPB. The ACT response should be linear in relation to the concentration of heparin in plasma. Twenty patients (n = 20) aged 20-80 years and admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery were enrolled to this clinical observational study. ACT values and antifactor Xa were sampled: 1) before induction of anesthesia, 2) after heparin bolus, 3) during CPB at the start of rewarming, 4) at weaning from CPB, and 5) after heparin reversal. The evaluation comprised the Hemostasis Management System Plus™ (HMS, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) and i-STAT™ (Abbott, Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ). Bias for the HMS Plus™ vs. i-STAT™ was +105 ± 119 seconds for measurements during CPB and +2.8 ± 11.7 seconds before and after CPB. Associated limits of agreement for the observed bias were ±235 and ±23 seconds, respectively. Inter-device correlation of ACT values was .46 (p < .001) during CPB; otherwise .48 (p = .02). Both devices produced ACT values unrelated (<10%) to the measured heparin concentration. The use of multivariable regression analysis demonstrated an independent association between the ACT measurement and hematocrit, however, not with the plasma concentration of heparin. ACT monitors demonstrate unacceptable bias differences, combined with wide limits of agreement. The ACT response correlated with hematocrit, but not with the actual heparin concentration. © Copyright 2020 AMSECT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activated clotting time; anticoagulation; cardiopulmonary bypass; heparin and heparin concentration; point of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32981959      PMCID: PMC7499231          DOI: 10.1182/ject-2000005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of point-of-care activated clotting time systems utilized in a single pediatric institution.

Authors:  Jorge W Ojito; Robert L Hannan; Michelle Moore Burgos; Hyunsoo Lim; Monique Huynh; Evelio Velis; Marino Arocha; Christopher F Tirotta; Redmond P Burke
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Comparison of ACT point-of-care measurements: repeatability and agreement.

Authors:  Y P J Bosch; Y M Ganushchak; D S de Jong
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Progress report: the activated coagulation time of whole blood (ACT).

Authors:  P G Hattersley
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Clinical evaluation of the i-STAT kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) test in different clinical settings in a large academic urban medical center: comparison with the Medtronic ACT Plus.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lee Lewandrowski; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Kimberly Gregory; Ik-Kyung Jang; Kent B Lewandrowski
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Effect of hemodilution on coagulation and recombinant factor VIIa efficacy in human blood in vitro.

Authors:  Daniel N Darlington; Angel V Delgado; Bijan S Kheirabadi; Chriselda G Fedyk; Michael R Scherer; Anthony E Pusateri; Charles E Wade; Andrew P Cap; John B Holcomb; Michael A Dubick
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

Review 6.  Anticoagulation management during cross-clamping and bypass.

Authors:  H Lander; M Zammert; D FitzGerald
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-07-27

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  In vitro and in vivo effects of hemodilution on kaolin-based activated clotting time predicted heparin requirement using a heparin dose-response technique.

Authors:  Junko Ichikawa; Satoshi Hagihira; Testu Mori; Mitsuharu Kodaka; Keiko Nishiyama; Makoto Ozaki; Makiko Komori
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  The impact of heparin concentration and activated clotting time monitoring on blood conservation. A prospective, randomized evaluation in patients undergoing cardiac operation.

Authors:  G J Despotis; J H Joist; C W Hogue; A Alsoufiev; K Kater; L T Goodnough; S A Santoro; E Spitznagel; M Rosenblum; D G Lappas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Simultaneous assessment of blood coagulation and hematocrit levels in dielectric blood coagulometry.

Authors:  Yoshihito Hayashi; Marc-Aurèle Brun; Kenzo Machida; Seungmin Lee; Aya Murata; Shinji Omori; Hidetoshi Uchiyama; Yoshinori Inoue; Toshifumi Kudo; Takahiro Toyofuku; Masayuki Nagasawa; Isao Uchimura; Tomomasa Nakamura; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.875

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  "In Less than No Time": Feasibility of Rotational Thromboelastometry to Detect Anticoagulant Drugs Activity and to Guide Reversal Therapy.

Authors:  Vittorio Pavoni; Lara Gianesello; Duccio Conti; Piercarlo Ballo; Pietro Dattolo; Domenico Prisco; Klaus Görlinger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Uninterrupted DOACs Approach for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Do DOACs Levels Matter?

Authors:  Michael Hardy; Jonathan Douxfils; Anne-Sophie Dincq; Anne-Laure Sennesael; Olivier Xhaet; Francois Mullier; Sarah Lessire
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.