Literature DB >> 22730859

Comparison of point-of-care activated clotting time systems utilized in a single pediatric institution.

Jorge W Ojito1, Robert L Hannan, Michelle Moore Burgos, Hyunsoo Lim, Monique Huynh, Evelio Velis, Marino Arocha, Christopher F Tirotta, Redmond P Burke.   

Abstract

This study compares four different activated clotting time (ACT) point-of-care (POC) testing systems used at our institution for the management of patients undergoing heparin therapy. We evaluated these systems under identical conditions to determine their accuracy, reproducibility, ease of use, and cost. Two separate testing stations containing four ACT systems were used. The testing order was randomized for every sample and performed by two trained individuals. Samples of fresh heparinized whole blood were taken at regular intervals and distributed to each station. Each operator tested 50 samples, totaling 400 ACT tests. The ACT value was significantly affected by the type of machine used at both stations 1 and 2 (p < .001). Compared with all systems, the Medtronic ACT Plus Automated Coagulation Timer System (ACT Plus) resulted in the most consistent ACT values (median = 171, Interquartile Range (IQR): 169-175) and least variability (172.17 +/- 5.24). The Hemochron Signature Elite Whole Blood Microcoagulation System had the most variability (221.10 +/- 14.78) and yielded consistently higher ACT values (median = 220, IQR: 210-229.5) compared with other systems. The ACT values reported by the i-STAT Handheld and Test Cartridge Blood Analysis System (153.30 +/- 7.87) were consistently lower (median = 154, IQR: 147-161) in comparison to the ACT Plus and Medtronic HMS Plus Hemostasis Management System (180.60 +/- 7.60, median = 181, IQR: 175-186). There was no statistical difference in results between the two testing sites (p > .05) or the operators (p > .05). The significant finding of this study was the affect each system has on the ACT value. This investigation demonstrates the variability that exists among different ACT monitoring systems at our institution. The discrepant variation in ACT values that exists with the Hemochron system questions the reliability of its use in the management of patients undergoing heparin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22730859      PMCID: PMC4557434     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  13 in total

1.  Heparin resistance.

Authors:  J A M Anderson; E L Saenko
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The relationship between heparin level and activated clotting time in the adult cardiac surgery population.

Authors:  D J Fitzgerald; A Patel; S C Body; S Garvin
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Guidelines for point-of-care testing. Improving patient outcomes.

Authors:  G J Kost
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Comparison of activated coagulation time and whole blood heparin measurements with laboratory plasma anti-Xa heparin concentration in patients having cardiac operations.

Authors:  G J Despotis; A L Summerfield; J H Joist; L T Goodnough; S A Santoro; E Spitznagel; J L Cox; D G Lappas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Lack of correlation between activated clotting time and plasma heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  A T Culliford; S N Gitel; N Starr; S T Thomas; F G Baumann; S Wessler; F C Spencer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Heparin detection by the activated coagulation time: a comparison of the sensitivity of coagulation tests and heparin assays.

Authors:  D J Murray; W J Brosnahan; B Pennell; D Kapalanski; J M Weiler; J Olson
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Heparin therapy during extracorporeal circulation. II. The use of a dose-response curve to individualize heparin and protamine dosage.

Authors:  B S Bull; W M Huse; F S Brauer; R A Korpman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The effect of an intraoperative treatment algorithm on physicians' transfusion practice in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G J Despotis; J E Grishaber; L T Goodnough
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Prospective evaluation and clinical utility of on-site monitoring of coagulation in patients undergoing cardiac operation.

Authors:  G J Despotis; S A Santoro; E Spitznagel; K M Kater; J L Cox; P Barnes; D G Lappas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Increased accuracy and precision of heparin and protamine dosing reduces blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing primary cardiac operations.

Authors:  D R Jobes; G L Aitken; G W Shaffer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical Evaluation of Measuring the ACT during Elective Cardiac Surgery with Two Different Devices.

Authors:  Florian Falter; Nabeel Razzaq; Martin John; Jens Fassl; Markus Maurer; Sean Ewing; Ross Hofmeyr
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-03

2.  Traditional and non-traditional anticoagulation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Andreas Koster; Edis Ljajikj; David Faraoni
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

3.  Opposite effects of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb aqueous extracts on blood coagulation function.

Authors:  Xianming Fei; Wufeng Yuan; Lei Jiang; Huan Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

4.  Transition from Hemochron Response to Hemochron Signature Elite Activated Clotting Time Devices in a Congenital Cardiac Surgery Practice.

Authors:  Gregory S Matte; Robert J Howe; Juan Ibla; Sirisha Emani; Sitaram M Emani
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2019-12

5.  Micro-mechanical blood clot testing using smartphones.

Authors:  Justin Chan; Kelly Michaelsen; Joanne K Estergreen; Daniel E Sabath; Shyamnath Gollakota
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Can We Rely on the Activated Clotting Time to Measure Heparin Anticoagulation? A Clinical Evaluation of Two ACT Monitors.

Authors:  Samuel Nilsson; Micael Appelblad; Staffan Svenmarker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-09

Review 7.  Anticoagulation Management and Monitoring during Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support: A Review of Current Issues.

Authors:  Lindsay M Ryerson; Laurence L Lequier
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.