Literature DB >> 32981078

Why we should care about movements: Using spatially explicit integrated population models to assess habitat source-sink dynamics.

Matthieu Paquet1, Debora Arlt1,2, Jonas Knape1, Matthew Low1, Pär Forslund1, Tomas Pärt1.   

Abstract

Assessing the source-sink status of populations and habitats is of major importance for understanding population dynamics and for the management of natural populations. Sources produce a net surplus of individuals (per capita contribution to the metapopulation > 1) and will be the main contributors for self-sustaining populations, whereas sinks produce a deficit (contribution < 1). However, making these types of assessments is generally hindered by the problem of separating mortality from permanent emigration, especially when survival probabilities as well as moved distances are habitat-specific. To address this long-standing issue, we propose a spatial multi-event integrated population model (IPM) that incorporates habitat-specific dispersal distances of individuals. Using information about local movements, this IPM adjusts survival estimates for emigration outside the study area. Analysing 24 years of data on a farmland passerine (the northern wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe), we assessed habitat-specific contributions, and hence the source-sink status and temporal variation of two key breeding habitats, while accounting for habitat- and sex-specific local dispersal distances of juveniles and adults. We then examined the sensitivity of the source-sink analysis by comparing results with and without accounting for these local movements. Estimates of first-year survival, and consequently habitat-specific contributions, were higher when local movement data were included. The consequences from including movement data were sex specific, with contribution shifting from sink to likely source in one habitat for males, and previously noted habitat differences for females disappearing. Assessing the source-sink status of habitats is extremely challenging. We show that our spatial IPM accounting for local movements can reduce biases in estimates of the contribution by different habitats, and thus reduce the overestimation of the occurrence of sink habitats. This approach allows combining all available data on demographic rates and movements, which will allow better assessment of source-sink dynamics and better informed conservation interventions.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Oenanthe oenanthezzm321990; dispersal; habitat quality; integrated population model; land use; population dynamics; sex differences; source-sink

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32981078      PMCID: PMC7756878          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.606


  26 in total

1.  Integrating mark-recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters.

Authors:  P Besbeas; S N Freeman; B J T Morgan; E A Catchpole
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  On the evolution of patch-type dependent immigration.

Authors:  Mats Gyllenberg; Éva Kisdi; Helene C Weigang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Multievent: an extension of multistate capture-recapture models to uncertain states.

Authors:  Roger Pradel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Characterizing source-sink dynamics with genetic parentage assignments.

Authors:  M Zachariah Peery; Steven R Beissinger; Roger F House; Martine Bérubé; Laurie A Hall; Anna Sellas; Per J Palsbøll
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates.

Authors:  W D Koenig; D Van Vuren; P N Hooge
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Breeding habitat selection across spatial scales: is grass always greener on the other side?

Authors:  Paul Acker; Aurélien Besnard; Jean-Yves Monnat; Emmanuelle Cam
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Experimental evidence of environmental effects on age-specific reproductive success: the importance of resource quality.

Authors:  T Pärt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Habitat-specific differences in adult survival rates and its links to parental workload and on-nest predation.

Authors:  Matthew Low; Debora Arlt; Sönke Eggers; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Nonideal breeding habitat selection: a mismatch between preference and fitness.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Sex-biased breeding dispersal is predicted by social environment in birds.

Authors:  Zsolt Végvári; Gergely Katona; Balázs Vági; Robert P Freckleton; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tamás Székely; András Liker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Why we should care about movements: Using spatially explicit integrated population models to assess habitat source-sink dynamics.

Authors:  Matthieu Paquet; Debora Arlt; Jonas Knape; Matthew Low; Pär Forslund; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.