Literature DB >> 28746975

Breeding habitat selection across spatial scales: is grass always greener on the other side?

Paul Acker1,2, Aurélien Besnard2, Jean-Yves Monnat3, Emmanuelle Cam1.   

Abstract

Habitat selection theory predicts that natural selection should favor mechanisms allowing individuals to choose habitats associated with the highest fitness prospects. However, identifying sources of information on habitat quality that individuals use to choose their breeding habitat has proved to be difficult. It has also proven difficult to identify dispersal costs that prevent individuals from joining the highest-quality sites. A synthesis that integrates dispersal costs and habitat selection mechanisms across space has remained elusive. Because costs of dispersal are generally distance-dependent, we suggest that a habitat selection strategy of sequential proximity search (SPS) can be favored by natural selection. This strategy requires that animals make decisions at multiple scales: whether to stay or leave the previous breeding site, depending on reproductive success; then, if dispersal is chosen, use information on neighborhood habitat quality to decide whether to stay in the neighborhood or leave, expanding the search area until the nearest suitable site is chosen. SPS minimizes distance-dependent dispersal costs while maximizing benefits of gaining a better habitat. We found evidence of breeding dispersal behavior consistent with this strategy in a kittiwake population stratified into a spatial hierarchy from colonies to nest sites. We used a mixed sequential regression model to study dispersal decisions, indexed by breeding dispersal movement, of 2,558 individuals over 32 yr. Scale-dependent dispersal propensities of kittiwakes varied according to breeding status, breeding experience, sex and individual identity. We suggest that distance-dependent dispersal costs result from strong competition among kittiwakes for nest sites. Individual decisions regarding dispersal (whether to leave or not, and where to go) depend on nesting habitat quality as well as the competitive ability required to keep territory ownership in a previous site, or to acquire a new site; this ability varies according to distance between sites and individual characteristics. Additional studies are needed to establish the generality of SPS in habitat selection.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonial species; habitat quality; habitat selection; informed dispersal; life history; ordinal response; public information; seabird; shrinkage prior; spatial scales

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28746975     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

1.  Insights on dispersal and recruitment paradigms: sex- and age-dependent variations in a nomadic breeder.

Authors:  Paul Acker; Charlotte Francesiaz; Arnaud Béchet; Nicolas Sadoul; Catherine M Lessells; Agata S Pijl; Aurélien Besnard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Can attraction to and competition for high-quality habitats shape breeding propensity?

Authors:  Paul Acker; Michael Schaub; Aurélien Besnard; Jean-Yves Monnat; Emmanuelle Cam
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Breeding transients in capture-recapture modeling and their consequences for local population dynamics.

Authors:  Daniel Oro; Daniel F Doak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Why we should care about movements: Using spatially explicit integrated population models to assess habitat source-sink dynamics.

Authors:  Matthieu Paquet; Debora Arlt; Jonas Knape; Matthew Low; Pär Forslund; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.