| Literature DB >> 32971775 |
Arantxa García-Legorreta1, Luis Alfonso Soriano-Pérez2, Aline Mariana Flores-Buendía2, Omar Noel Medina-Campos2, Lilia G Noriega3, Omar Granados-Portillo3, Rafael Nambo-Venegas4, Armando R Tovar3, Alfredo Mendoza-Vargas5, Diana Barrera-Oviedo6, José Pedraza-Chaverri2, Berenice Palacios-González1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnesium is a mineral that modulates several physiological processes. However, its relationship with intestinal microbiota has been scarcely studied. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the role of dietary magnesium content to modulate the intestinal microbiota of Wistar male rats.Entities:
Keywords: Wistar male rat; dietary magnesium; gut microbiota; minerals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32971775 PMCID: PMC7551274 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Body and biochemical parameters among the groups.
| Low-Mg (L-Mg) | Control | High-Mg (H-Mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basal weight (g) | 154 ± 4.3 | 154 ± 5 | 153.5 ± 3.9 |
| Final weight (g) | 214.7 ± 6.5 | 205.8 ± 12.8 | 210.3 ± 6.6 |
| Weight gain (g) | 60.7 | 56.8 | 66.0 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 123 ± 12 | 102 ± 7 | 116 ± 11 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 108 ± 17 | 128 ± 31 | 74 ± 5 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 59 ± 4 | 58 ± 4 | 58 ± 4 |
| Food intake (g/d) | 18.08 ± 0.297 | 16.9 ± 0.47 | 16.6 ± 0.37 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Krustal–Wallis test, p < 0.05.
Figure 1Alpha and beta diversity among the groups. (a) Observed species among the study groups. (b) Comparison of species richness among the groups. (c) Comparison of species diversity among the groups. (d) Beta diversity. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plot based on generalized UniFrac distances among the groups. Low magnesium diet (L-Mg) (light blue circles), control diet (C-Mg) (gray circles), and high magnesium diet (H-Mg) (dark blue circles). * p < 0.05 compared to the C-Mg group. Boxes represent the minimum value to the maximum value, with the internal horizontal line representing the median.
Figure 2Bacterial taxonomy among the groups. (a) Phylum-level composition (% relative abundances) among the three study groups. (b) Fecal microbiota composition among the study groups. The outermost ring indicates phylum level; the middle ring displays composition at the family level and the innermost ring at genus level. (c) Linear discriminant analysis effect size among the study groups.
Figure 3Network analysis of intestinal microbiota using SparCC correlation coefficients between the groups. The networks indicate abundant sequences at the genus level. The nodes represent genera; the edges represent the correlation between genera. The gray lines indicate negative correlations; the orange lines are for positive correlations. Nodes are colored according to their abundance among the groups.
Figure 4Inferred metagenomic analyses from the fecal microbiomes of the L-Mg, C-Mg, and H-Mg groups. (a) The relative contribution of KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways encoded in the gut microbiota of the L-Mg, C-Mg, and H-Mg groups. (b) KEGG pathways consistently enriched or depleted in the fecal microbiomes of the L-Mg or H-Mg groups compared with the C-Mg group. Red denotes enrichment and green indicates depletion. Black indicates pathways whose representation is not significantly different. (c) Plot of the most significant KEGG Orthology (KO) identified by random forest. The features are ranked by the mean decrease in classification accuracy (500 permutations). Red denotes the most important feature and blue indicates the least important feature.