Literature DB >> 32964501

To tolerate or to agree: A tutorial on tolerance intervals in method comparison studies with BivRegBLS R Package.

Bernard G Francq1, Marion Berger2, Charles Boachie3.   

Abstract

The well-known agreement interval by Bland and Altman is extensively applied in method comparison studies. Two clinical measurement methods are considered interchangeable if their differences are not clinically significant. The agreement interval is commonly applied to assess the spread of the differences. However, this interval is approximate (too narrow) and several authors propose calculating a confidence interval around each bound. This article demonstrates that this approach is misleading, awkward, and confusing. On the other hand, tolerance intervals are exact and can include a confidence level if needed. Tolerance intervals are also easier to calculate and to interpret. Real data sets are used to illustrate the tolerance intervals with the R package BivRegBLS under normal or log-normal assumptions. Furthermore, it is also explained how to assess the coverage probabilities of the tolerance intervals with simulations.
© 2020 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BivRegBLS; Bland-Altman; R package; agreement; coverage probabilities; method comparison studies; prediction interval; tolerance interval

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32964501      PMCID: PMC7756677          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

Review 1.  Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.557

2.  Linear regression analysis for comparing two measurers or methods of measurement: but which regression?

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 3.  How to regress and predict in a Bland-Altman plot? Review and contribution based on tolerance intervals and correlated-errors-in-variables models.

Authors:  Bernard G Francq; Bernadette Govaerts
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Confidence in Altman-Bland plots: a critical review of the method of differences.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 5.  Comparing methods of measurements.

Authors:  J Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.557

6.  The top 100 papers.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden; Brendan Maher; Regina Nuzzo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement.

Authors:  Andrew Carkeet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Understanding Bland Altman analysis.

Authors:  Davide Giavarina
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  To tolerate or to agree: A tutorial on tolerance intervals in method comparison studies with BivRegBLS R Package.

Authors:  Bernard G Francq; Marion Berger; Charles Boachie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  Validation of 3-dimensional mathematical computation of feline bladder volume using orthogonal ultrasonographic bladder images.

Authors:  Chien Hsien Kitty Yang; Shane W Bateman; Xiu Ting Yiew; Allan R Willms
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 0.897

2.  To tolerate or to agree: A tutorial on tolerance intervals in method comparison studies with BivRegBLS R Package.

Authors:  Bernard G Francq; Marion Berger; Charles Boachie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.