| Literature DB >> 32953704 |
Kyung-Jae Lee1, Sang-Hyun Um1, Young-Hun Kim1.
Abstract
As the proportion of elderly individuals within the population grows, the incidence of hip fractures increases. Traditionally, orthopedic surgeons used to focus on surgical treatment of hip fractures; however, the field's appreciation for the importance of postoperative rehabilitation has been increasing recently. Many studies have shown that proper rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery can shorten hospital stays and improve clinical outcomes. However, such studies use different methods and published rehabilitation protocols address varying aspects that do not always overlap. Here, we review and summarize the latest guidelines and studies on postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients with hip fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Hip fractures; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32953704 PMCID: PMC7476786 DOI: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.3.125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hip Pelvis ISSN: 2287-3260
Fig. 1(A) Ankle pumps. Ankle plantar flexion (left) and ankle dorsiflexion (right). (B) Knee-extension strength training. While supine, the patient tightens quadriceps in an attempt to straighten the knee (hold for 5–10 seconds). (C) Straight leg raise. While supine, the patient tightens the quadriceps, flexes the hip and keeps the knee straight while lifting the extremity off the bed (hold for 5–10 seconds), then lowers it slowly.
Characteristics and Measurement Methods of Monitoring Score Systems
| Monitoring score | Characteristic | Measurement method |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulated ambulation score | Basic mobility at pre-fracture, to daily post-surgery use until independence in basic mobility is reached. | 1) Getting in and out of bed |
| Early prediction of short-term postoperative outcome after hip fracture surgery (length of hospitalization, 30-day mortality). | 2) Sit to stand to sit from a chair with arms | |
| 3) Walking with an appropriate aid (0: not able to, 1: able to with assistance from one or more persons, 2: independent of human assistance) | ||
| Total score from 0 to 6 | ||
| Modified new mobility score | Functional level at pre-fracture and follow-up. | 1) Indoor walking |
| Valid predictor of mortality and rehabilitation outcome. | 2) Outdoor walking | |
| High inter-tester reliability. | 3) ShoppingIt provides a score between 0 and 3 for each (0: not at all, 1: with help from another person, 2: with an aid, 3: no difficulty) | |
| Total score from 0 to 9 | ||
| Timed up and go test | Score system that measures functional mobility for quantification of the mobility level. | Time from seated in a chair with arms, walk 3 meters to a line drawn on the floor, turn around, walk back, and sit down. |
| The time is prolonged if a standard 4-legged walker is used. | ||
| Verbal rating scale | Hip fracture-related pain at all time-points following fracture. | 0: no pain, 1: slight pain, 2: moderate pain, 3: severe pain, 4: unbearable |
| Low error rates compared with graphic instruments like the visual analogue scale among the elderly. |