| Literature DB >> 35371681 |
Tomohiro Fujikawa1, Seita Takahashi1, Naoki Shinohara2, Naohiko Mashima3, Masao Koda4, Hiroshi Takahashi4, Yoshihiro Yasunaga4, Yoshiyuki Sankai5, Masashi Yamazaki4, Kousei Miura4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To extend life expectancy after surgery, patients with hip fractures need to improve their mobility quickly through postoperative rehabilitation. Voluntary hip joint motion supported by the hybrid assistive limb (HAL) lumbar type, an exoskeleton robot suit characterized by its ability to detect the wearer's intentions through the bioelectrical signals and assist hip extension motions at an optimal timing, may be effective to improve mobility in patients with hip joint dysfunction after surgery. We aimed to introduce rehabilitation using the HAL lumbar type in the early period after hip fracture surgery.Entities:
Keywords: exoskeleton; hip fracture; hybrid assistive limb; postoperative rehabilitation; robot rehabilitation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35371681 PMCID: PMC8943782 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Hybrid assistive limb (HAL) lumbar type
The electric motors in the power units can assist hip joint extension motion when a wearer stands up.
Figure 2Standing up exercise from a sitting position
Figure 3Squatting exercise in a standing position
Patient demographic data
FN, femoral neck fracture; FT, femoral trochanteric fracture; HF, hip fracture; HAL, hybrid assistive limb; POD, postoperative day
| Characteristics | ||
| Sample size | N (%) | 14 |
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD (range) | 83.4 ± 8.4 (69-96) |
| Sex (%) | Male | 1 (7.1) |
| Female | 13 (92.9) | |
| Fracture type (%) | FN | 2 (14.3) |
| FT | 12 (85.7) | |
| Ambulation before HF (%) | Independent | 13 (92.9) |
| Cane | 1 (7.1) | |
| HAL start (POD) | Mean ± SD (range) | 5.9 ± 2.5 (2-8) |
Patient clinical characteristics
Values are mean ± standard deviation. FN, femoral neck fracture; FT, femoral trochanteric fracture; HF, hip fracture; HAL, hybrid assistive limb; POD, postoperative day; FTSS, five-times-sit-to-stand test; TUG, timed-up-and-go test; *P < 0.01 (compared with Pre-HAL FTSS)
| Case | Age (years) | Sex | Fracture type | Ambulation before HF | HAL start (POD) | Walker start (POD) | Pre-HAL FTSS | Post-HAL FTSS | Pre-HAL TUG | Post-HAL TUG | ||
| 1 | 72 | F | FN | Independent | 8 | 11 | 16.4 | 8.22 | 15.2 | 8.2 | ||
| 2 | 85 | F | FN | Independent | 8 | 16 | 35.5 | 31.4 | 48.7 | 25.4 | ||
| 3 | 85 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 13 | 41.3 | 12.33 | 101.2 | 18.9 | ||
| 4 | 70 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 11 | 32.7 | 18.2 | 16.3 | 11.1 | ||
| 5 | 91 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 14 | 42.2 | 15.1 | - | 21.4 | ||
| 6 | 96 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 19 | 43.2 | 22.6 | - | 13.7 | ||
| 7 | 80 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 12 | 41.2 | 21.32 | 72.0 | 19.4 | ||
| 8 | 84 | F | FT | Independent | 8 | 10 | 26.4 | 20.22 | 59.7 | 32.4 | ||
| 9 | 69 | M | FT | Independent | 3 | 7 | 29.2 | 6.99 | - | 14.6 | ||
| 10 | 83 | F | FT | Independent | 4 | 22 | 39.9 | 27.84 | - | 22.9 | ||
| 11 | 90 | F | FT | Independent | 4 | 12 | 32.4 | 15.67 | - | 53.4 | ||
| 12 | 87 | F | FT | Independent | 2 | 7 | 45.3 | 25.34 | - | 24.8 | ||
| 13 | 94 | F | FT | Cane | 3 | 8 | 38.4 | 33.72 | 32.9 | 29.7 | ||
| 14 | 81 | F | FT | Independent | 3 | 10 | 24.5 | 18.24 | - | 21.6 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 34.9 ± 8.4 | 19.8 ± 8.0* | ||||||||||
| Effect size | 1.81 (95 % CI = 0.93-2.66) | |||||||||||
| Power | 0.99 | |||||||||||