Literature DB >> 19289358

Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.

David Soto1, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that the contents of working memory (WM) can guide the early deployment of attention in visual search. Here, we assessed whether this guidance occurred for all attributes of items held in WM, or whether effects are based on just the attributes relevant for the memory task. We asked observers to hold in memory just the shape of a coloured object and to subsequently search for a target line amongst distractor lines, each embedded within a different object. On some trials, one of the objects in the search display could match the shape, the colour or both dimensions of the cue, but this object never contained the relevant target line. Relative to a neutral baseline, where there was no match between the memory and the search displays, search performance was impaired when a distractor object matched both the colour and the shape of the memory cue. The implications for the understanding of the interaction between WM and selection are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289358     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  19 in total

1.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

2.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-08

3.  Tracking neural markers of template formation and implementation in attentional inhibition under different distractor consistency.

Authors:  Wen Wen 雯文; Zhibang Huang 邦黄志; Yin Hou 寅侯; Sheng Li 晟李
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

5.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Flexible working memory representation of the relationship between an object and its location as revealed by interactions with attention.

Authors:  Joseph B Sala; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.

Authors:  MaryAnn P Noonan; Nika Adamian; Alexandra Pike; Frida Printzlau; Ben M Crittenden; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  How memory mechanisms are a key component in the guidance of our eye movements: evidence from the global effect.

Authors:  J D Silvis; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

10.  The importance of being relevant.

Authors:  Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.