Literature DB >> 32946521

What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.

Anneke Zuiderwijk1, Rhythima Shinde2, Wei Jeng3.   

Abstract

Both sharing and using open research data have the revolutionary potentials for forwarding scientific advancement. Although previous research gives insight into researchers' drivers and inhibitors for sharing and using open research data, both these drivers and inhibitors have not yet been integrated via a thematic analysis and a theoretical argument is lacking. This study's purpose is to systematically review the literature on individual researchers' drivers and inhibitors for sharing and using open research data. This study systematically analyzed 32 open data studies (published between 2004 and 2019 inclusively) and elicited drivers plus inhibitors for both open research data sharing and use in eleven categories total that are: 'the researcher's background', 'requirements and formal obligations', 'personal drivers and intrinsic motivations', 'facilitating conditions', 'trust', 'expected performance', 'social influence and affiliation', 'effort', 'the researcher's experience and skills', 'legislation and regulation', and 'data characteristics.' This study extensively discusses these categories, along with argues how such categories and factors are connected using a thematic analysis. Also, this study discusses several opportunities for altogether applying, extending, using, and testing theories in open research data studies. With such discussions, an overview of identified categories and factors can be further applied to examine both researchers' drivers and inhibitors in different research disciplines, such as those with low rates of data sharing and use versus disciplines with high rates of data sharing plus use. What's more, this study serves as a first vital step towards developing effective incentives for both open data sharing and use behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32946521      PMCID: PMC7500699          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  18 in total

1.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories.

Authors:  Melissa H Cragin; Carole L Palmer; Jacob R Carlson; Michael Witt
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The what, why, and how of born-open data.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

3.  The Open Knowledge Foundation: open data means better science.

Authors:  Jennifer C Molloy
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate.

Authors:  Heather A Piwowar; Roger S Day; Douglas B Fridsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?

Authors:  Tobias Haeusermann; Bastian Greshake; Alessandro Blasimme; Darja Irdam; Martin Richards; Effy Vayena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Wide-Open: Accelerating public data release by automating detection of overdue datasets.

Authors:  Maxim Grechkin; Hoifung Poon; Bill Howe
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models.

Authors:  Luc Rocher; Julien M Hendrickx; Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology.

Authors:  Jillian C Wallis; Elizabeth Rolando; Christine L Borgman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum's Open Data Survey.

Authors:  Birgit Schmidt; Birgit Gemeinholzer; Andrew Treloar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.

Authors:  Mark D Wilkinson; Michel Dumontier; I Jsbrand Jan Aalbersberg; Gabrielle Appleton; Myles Axton; Arie Baak; Niklas Blomberg; Jan-Willem Boiten; Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos; Philip E Bourne; Jildau Bouwman; Anthony J Brookes; Tim Clark; Mercè Crosas; Ingrid Dillo; Olivier Dumon; Scott Edmunds; Chris T Evelo; Richard Finkers; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Alasdair J G Gray; Paul Groth; Carole Goble; Jeffrey S Grethe; Jaap Heringa; Peter A C 't Hoen; Rob Hooft; Tobias Kuhn; Ruben Kok; Joost Kok; Scott J Lusher; Maryann E Martone; Albert Mons; Abel L Packer; Bengt Persson; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Marco Roos; Rene van Schaik; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Erik Schultes; Thierry Sengstag; Ted Slater; George Strawn; Morris A Swertz; Mark Thompson; Johan van der Lei; Erik van Mulligen; Jan Velterop; Andra Waagmeester; Peter Wittenburg; Katherine Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao; Barend Mons
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  4 in total

1.  Seeing oneself as a data reuser: How subjectification activates the drivers of data reuse in science.

Authors:  Marcel LaFlamme; Marion Poetz; Daniel Spichtinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Perceptions and behavior of clinical researchers and research support staff regarding data FAIRification.

Authors:  Martijn G Kersloot; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Ronald Cornet; Derk L Arts
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 8.501

3.  Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.

Authors:  Helen Buckley Woods; Stephen Pinfield
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review-A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists.

Authors:  Ksenija Baždarić; Iva Vrkić; Evgenia Arh; Martina Mavrinac; Maja Gligora Marković; Lidija Bilić-Zulle; Jadranka Stojanovski; Mario Malički
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.