Literature DB >> 26428912

The what, why, and how of born-open data.

Jeffrey N Rouder1.   

Abstract

Although many researchers agree that scientific data should be open to scrutiny to ferret out poor analyses and outright fraud, most raw data sets are not available on demand. There are many reasons researchers do not open their data, and one is technical. It is often time consuming to prepare and archive data. In response, my laboratory has automated the process such that our data are archived the night they are created without any human approval or action. All data are versioned, logged, time stamped, and uploaded including aborted runs and data from pilot subjects. The archive is GitHub, github.com, the world's largest collection of open-source materials. Data archived in this manner are called born open. In this paper, I discuss the benefits of born-open data and provide a brief technical overview of the process. I also address some of the common concerns about opening data before publication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data integrity; Data sharing; Open data; Open science

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26428912     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0630-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  9 in total

Review 1.  A beginner's guide to data stewardship and data sharing.

Authors:  Marcel P Dijkers
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Building a collaborative Psychological Science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1.

Authors:  Krista Byers-Heinlein; Christina Bergmann; Catherine Davies; Michael C Frank; J Kiley Hamlin; Melissa Kline; Jonathan F Kominsky; Jessica E Kosie; Casey Lew-Williams; Liquan Liu; Meghan Mastroberardino; Leher Singh; Connor P G Waddell; Martin Zettersten; Melanie Soderstrom
Journal:  Can Psychol       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.

Authors:  Anneke Zuiderwijk; Rhythima Shinde; Wei Jeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Data sharing in psychology.

Authors:  Maryann E Martone; Alexander Garcia-Castro; Gary R VandenBos
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018 Feb-Mar

5.  A network of change: united action on research integrity.

Authors:  Thomas Rhys Evans; Madeleine Pownall; Elizabeth Collins; Emma L Henderson; Jade S Pickering; Aoife O'Mahony; Mirela Zaneva; Matt Jaquiery; Tsvetomira Dumbalska
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 6.  The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review.

Authors:  Richard D Morey; Christopher D Chambers; Peter J Etchells; Christine R Harris; Rink Hoekstra; Daniël Lakens; Stephan Lewandowsky; Candice Coker Morey; Daniel P Newman; Felix D Schönbrodt; Wolf Vanpaemel; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  The Privacy and Security Implications of Open Data in Healthcare.

Authors:  Shinji Kobayashi; Thomas B Kane; Chris Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2018-04-22

8.  Privacy versus open science.

Authors:  Simon Dennis; Paul Garrett; Hyungwook Yim; Jihun Hamm; Adam F Osth; Vishnu Sreekumar; Ben Stone
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-08

9.  A decentralized framework for cultivating research lifecycle transparency.

Authors:  Wei Jeng; Shih-Hung Wang; Hung-Wei Chen; Po-Wei Huang; Yu-Jen Chen; Hsu-Chun Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.