Helen Buckley Woods1, Stephen Pinfield1. 1. Research on Research Institute, Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.
Abstract
Background: Numerous mechanisms exist to incentivise researchers to share their data. This scoping review aims to identify and summarise evidence of the efficacy of different interventions to promote open data practices and provide an overview of current research. Methods: This scoping review is based on data identified from Web of Science and LISTA, limited from 2016 to 2021. A total of 1128 papers were screened, with 38 items being included. Items were selected if they focused on designing or evaluating an intervention or presenting an initiative to incentivise sharing. Items comprised a mixture of research papers, opinion pieces and descriptive articles. Results: Seven major themes in the literature were identified: publisher/journal data sharing policies, metrics, software solutions, research data sharing agreements in general, open science 'badges', funder mandates, and initiatives. Conclusions: A number of key messages for data sharing include: the need to build on existing cultures and practices, meeting people where they are and tailoring interventions to support them; the importance of publicising and explaining the policy/service widely; the need to have disciplinary data champions to model good practice and drive cultural change; the requirement to resource interventions properly; and the imperative to provide robust technical infrastructure and protocols, such as labelling of data sets, use of DOIs, data standards and use of data repositories. Copyright:
Background: Numerous mechanisms exist to incentivise researchers to share their data. This scoping review aims to identify and summarise evidence of the efficacy of different interventions to promote open data practices and provide an overview of current research. Methods: This scoping review is based on data identified from Web of Science and LISTA, limited from 2016 to 2021. A total of 1128 papers were screened, with 38 items being included. Items were selected if they focused on designing or evaluating an intervention or presenting an initiative to incentivise sharing. Items comprised a mixture of research papers, opinion pieces and descriptive articles. Results: Seven major themes in the literature were identified: publisher/journal data sharing policies, metrics, software solutions, research data sharing agreements in general, open science 'badges', funder mandates, and initiatives. Conclusions: A number of key messages for data sharing include: the need to build on existing cultures and practices, meeting people where they are and tailoring interventions to support them; the importance of publicising and explaining the policy/service widely; the need to have disciplinary data champions to model good practice and drive cultural change; the requirement to resource interventions properly; and the imperative to provide robust technical infrastructure and protocols, such as labelling of data sets, use of DOIs, data standards and use of data repositories. Copyright:
Authors: Juan C Prieto; Beatriz Paniagua; Marilia S Yatabe; Antonio C O Ruellas; Liana Fattori; Luciana Muniz; Martin Styner; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2017-03-13
Authors: Philippe Rocca-Serra; Reza M Salek; Masanori Arita; Elon Correa; Saravanan Dayalan; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Tim Ebbels; Royston Goodacre; Janna Hastings; Kenneth Haug; Albert Koulman; Macha Nikolski; Matej Oresic; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Daniel Schober; James Smith; Christoph Steinbeck; Mark R Viant; Steffen Neumann Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Lisa M Federer; Christopher W Belter; Douglas J Joubert; Alicia Livinski; Ya-Ling Lu; Lissa N Snyders; Holly Thompson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tom E Hardwicke; Maya B Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C Banks; Mallory C Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton; Erica J Yoon; Michael Henry Tessler; Richie L Lenne; Sara Altman; Bria Long; Michael C Frank Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 2.963