Literature DB >> 35169638

Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.

Helen Buckley Woods1, Stephen Pinfield1.   

Abstract

Background: Numerous mechanisms exist to incentivise researchers to share their data. This scoping review aims to identify and summarise evidence of the efficacy of different interventions to promote open data practices and provide an overview of current research.
Methods: This scoping review is based on data identified from Web of Science and LISTA, limited from 2016 to 2021. A total of 1128 papers were screened, with 38 items being included. Items were selected if they focused on designing or evaluating an intervention or presenting an initiative to incentivise sharing. Items comprised a mixture of research papers, opinion pieces and descriptive articles.
Results: Seven major themes in the literature were identified: publisher/journal data sharing policies, metrics, software solutions, research data sharing agreements in general, open science 'badges', funder mandates, and initiatives. Conclusions: A number of key messages for data sharing include: the need to build on existing cultures and practices, meeting people where they are and tailoring interventions to support them; the importance of publicising and explaining the policy/service widely; the need to have disciplinary data champions to model good practice and drive cultural change; the requirement to resource interventions properly; and the imperative to provide robust technical infrastructure and protocols, such as labelling of data sets, use of DOIs, data standards and use of data repositories. Copyright:
© 2022 Woods HB and Pinfield S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data sharing; open data; open science; research data; scoping review

Year:  2022        PMID: 35169638      PMCID: PMC8808319.2          DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17286.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wellcome Open Res        ISSN: 2398-502X


  41 in total

1.  Federating Heterogeneous Datasets to Enhance Data Sharing and Experiment Reproducibility.

Authors:  Juan C Prieto; Beatriz Paniagua; Marilia S Yatabe; Antonio C O Ruellas; Liana Fattori; Luciana Muniz; Martin Styner; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-13

2.  [Data sharing policies of clinical trials funders in France].

Authors:  Pauline Rollando; Céline Parc; Florian Naudet; Jeanne Fabiola Gaba
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.070

Review 3.  IMPACT Observatory: tracking the evolution of clinical trial data sharing and research integrity.

Authors:  Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Mirko Gabelica; Rita Banzi; Marina Krnić Martinić; Bibiana Pulido; Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo; Ludovic Reveiz; Josip Šimić; Ana Utrobičić; Irena Hrgović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

4.  A study of the impact of data sharing on article citations using journal policies as a natural experiment.

Authors:  Garret Christensen; Allan Dafoe; Edward Miguel; Don A Moore; Andrew K Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way.

Authors:  Philippe Rocca-Serra; Reza M Salek; Masanori Arita; Elon Correa; Saravanan Dayalan; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Tim Ebbels; Royston Goodacre; Janna Hastings; Kenneth Haug; Albert Koulman; Macha Nikolski; Matej Oresic; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Daniel Schober; James Smith; Christoph Steinbeck; Mark R Viant; Steffen Neumann
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.290

6.  Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements.

Authors:  Lisa M Federer; Christopher W Belter; Douglas J Joubert; Alicia Livinski; Ya-Ling Lu; Lissa N Snyders; Holly Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition.

Authors:  Tom E Hardwicke; Maya B Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C Banks; Mallory C Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton; Erica J Yoon; Michael Henry Tessler; Richie L Lenne; Sara Altman; Bria Long; Michael C Frank
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anisa Rowhani-Farid; Adrian Aldcroft; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Is useful research data usually shared? An investigation of genome-wide association study summary statistics.

Authors:  Mike Thelwall; Marcus Munafò; Amalia Mas-Bleda; Emma Stuart; Meiko Makita; Verena Weigert; Chris Keene; Nushrat Khan; Katie Drax; Kayvan Kousha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Identifying and addressing data asymmetries so as to enable (better) science.

Authors:  Stefaan Verhulst; Andrew Young
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.