Literature DB >> 20679120

Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories.

Melissa H Cragin1, Carole L Palmer, Jacob R Carlson, Michael Witt.   

Abstract

Results are presented from the Data Curation Profiles project research, on who is willing to share what data with whom and when. Emerging from scientists' discussions on sharing are several dimensions suggestive of the variation in both what it means 'to share' and how these processes are carried out. This research indicates that data curation services will need to accommodate a wide range of subdisciplinary data characteristics and sharing practices. As part of a larger set of strategies emerging across academic institutions, institutional repositories (IRs) will contribute to the stewardship and mobilization of scientific research data for e-Research and learning. There will be particular types of data that can be managed well in an IR context when characteristics and practices are well understood. Findings from this study elucidate scientists' views on 'sharable' forms of data-the particular representation that they view as most valued for reuse by others within their own research areas-and the anticipated duration for such reuse. Reported sharing incidents that provide insights into barriers to sharing and related concerns on data misuse are included.

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679120     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

Review 1.  Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience.

Authors:  Adam R Ferguson; Jessica L Nielson; Melissa H Cragin; Anita E Bandrowski; Maryann E Martone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.

Authors:  Anneke Zuiderwijk; Rhythima Shinde; Wei Jeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment (MICEE): standardised reporting for model reproducibility, interoperability, and data sharing.

Authors:  T A Quinn; S Granite; M A Allessie; C Antzelevitch; C Bollensdorff; G Bub; R A B Burton; E Cerbai; P S Chen; M Delmar; D Difrancesco; Y E Earm; I R Efimov; M Egger; E Entcheva; M Fink; R Fischmeister; M R Franz; A Garny; W R Giles; T Hannes; S E Harding; P J Hunter; G Iribe; J Jalife; C R Johnson; R S Kass; I Kodama; G Koren; P Lord; V S Markhasin; S Matsuoka; A D McCulloch; G R Mirams; G E Morley; S Nattel; D Noble; S P Olesen; A V Panfilov; N A Trayanova; U Ravens; S Richard; D S Rosenbaum; Y Rudy; F Sachs; F B Sachse; D A Saint; U Schotten; O Solovyova; P Taggart; L Tung; A Varró; P G Volders; K Wang; J N Weiss; E Wettwer; E White; R Wilders; R L Winslow; P Kohl
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  What drives academic data sharing?

Authors:  Benedikt Fecher; Sascha Friesike; Marcel Hebing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Site-based data curation based on hot spring geobiology.

Authors:  Carole L Palmer; Andrea K Thomer; Karen S Baker; Karen M Wickett; Christie L Hendrix; Ann Rodman; Stacey Sigler; Bruce W Fouke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When are researchers willing to share their data? - Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia.

Authors:  Stefan Stieglitz; Konstantin Wilms; Milad Mirbabaie; Lennart Hofeditz; Bela Brenger; Ania López; Stephanie Rehwald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Decentralized Analysis of Brain Imaging Data: Voxel-Based Morphometry and Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity.

Authors:  Harshvardhan Gazula; Bradley T Baker; Eswar Damaraju; Sergey M Plis; Sandeep R Panta; Rogers F Silva; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology.

Authors:  Jillian C Wallis; Elizabeth Rolando; Christine L Borgman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum's Open Data Survey.

Authors:  Birgit Schmidt; Birgit Gemeinholzer; Andrew Treloar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Data Access and Usage Practices Across a Cohort of Researchers at a Large Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: Qualitative Survey Study.

Authors:  Hoi Ki Kiki Ho; Matthias Görges; Elodie Portales-Casamar
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.