| Literature DB >> 32942637 |
Wenting Lan1, Siying Li1, Shiti Shama1, Yuqing Zhao1, Dur E Sameen1, Li He1, Yaowen Liu1,2.
Abstract
An antibacterial and anti-oxidation composite film was prepared by a casting method using sodium alginate (SA) andEntities:
Keywords: apple polyphenol; sodium alginate; strawberry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32942637 PMCID: PMC7570076 DOI: 10.3390/polym12092096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Decay rate evaluation.
| Decay Level | Evaluation Criterion |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1–20% of surface was infected |
| 2 | 21–40% of surface was infected |
| 3 | 41–60% of surface was infected |
| 4 | 61–80% of surface was infected |
| 5 | ≥81% of surface was infected |
Figure 1(a) L*, (b) a*, (c) b*, and (d) ΔE values of the sodium alginate (SA)/silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)/ apple polyphenol (APP) composite film with different ultrasonic time, respectively; (e) the picture of the SA/AgNPs/APP composite films with different proportions. (* p < 0.05, n = 5.)
Mechanical properties of SA/AgNPs/APP film.
| SA:AgNPs | 0 min | 10 min | 20 min | 30 min | 40 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS (MPa) | 10:0 | 23.16 ± 1.64 a | 25.72 ± 1.53 a | 27.96 ± 1.41 a | 28.06 ± 1.55 a | 24.07 ± 1.28 a |
| 9:1 | 21.46 ± 1.38 b | 23.23 ± 1.15 b | 24.31 ± 1.21 b | 26.98 ± 1.32 b | 23.43 ± 1.19 a | |
| 8:2 | 20.04 ± 1.12 b | 22.49 ± 1.13 b | 23.96 ± 1.13 b | 24.07 ± 1.18 b | 21.52 ± 1.10 b | |
| 7:3 | 18.11 ± 0.99 c | 20.54 ± 1.07 b | 22.57 ± 1.10 b | 23.94 ± 1.13 b | 20.80 ± 1.02 b | |
| 6:4 | 16.34 ± 0.89 d | 17.45 ± 0.92 c | 20.24 ± 0.96 c | 21.50 ± 1.01 c | 16.67 ± 0.90 c | |
| E (%) | 10:0 | 18.10 ± 1.12 a | 21.60 ± 1.19 a | 24.31 ± 1.23 a | 26.10 ± 1.39 a | 23.30 ± 1.11 a |
| 9:1 | 13.99 ± 2.19 b | 22.83 ± 1.14 a | 25.95 ± 1.26 a | 27.49 ± 1.42 a | 26.51 ± 1.32 b | |
| 8:2 | 14.79 ± 1.16 b | 23.25 ± 1.18 a | 26.83 ± 1.37 a | 28.90 ± 1.54 a | 27.95 ± 1.40 b | |
| 7:3 | 16.40 ± 1.18 a | 25.15 ± 1.21 b | 27.44 ± 1.40 a | 29.18 ± 1.59 a | 28.29 ± 1.46 b | |
| 6:4 | 21.08 ± 1.31 c | 23.15 ± 1.18 a | 25.07 ± 1.34 a | 27.09 ± 1.41 a | 26.04 ± 1.33 b |
Different letters indicate significant differences in each column of data (p < 0.05, n = 5); 0–40 min is the ultrasonic processing time. TS, tensile strength; E, elongation at break.
Figure 2(a) Water vapor permeability (WVP) of SA/AgNPs/APP composite film SA/APP and under different ultrasonication times; (b) the contact angle of SA/AgNPs/APP (ultrasound time 30 min) composite film with different addition ratios, (c) swelling ratio (SR) of film (* p < 0.05, n = 5).
Figure 3(a) FTIR and (b) XRD of SA, APP, Ag, SA/APP and SA/AgNPs/APP composite films.
Figure 4(a) TEM of AgNPs; (b) SEM images of SA/AgNPs/APP composite film with different ultrasound time, different addition ratio and different magnification.
Figure 5EDS image of SA/AgNPs/APP composite film.
Figure 6DSC of SA, SA/APP and SA/AgNPs/APP composite films.
Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the composite films.
| Samples | Antibacterial Property (%) | DPPH (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| SA | - | - | 1.01 ± 0.53 |
| SA/AgNPs/APP-10:0 | 27.61 ± 0.53 d | 27.84 ± 0.49 d | 99.89 ± 0.07 a |
| SA/AgNPs/APP-9:1 | 58.98 ± 0.28 c | 54.90 ± 0.22 c | 95.57 ± 0.32 a |
| SA/AgNPs/APP-8:2 | 83.17 ± 0.73 b | 84.54 ± 0.53 b | 97.23 ± 0.21 a |
| SA/AgNPs/APP-7:3 | 91.26 ± 0.49 a | 92.01 ± 0.55 a | 98.39 ± 0.11 a |
| SA/AgNPs/APP-6:4 | 92.48 ± 0.88 a | 92.78 ± 0.37 a | 95.92 ± 0.35 a |
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in each column of data (p < 0.05, n = 5).
Sensory evaluation of strawberry fruit.
| Days (d) | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA/AgNPs/APP | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | 8.5 ± 0.3 a | 8.2 ± 0.1 a | 7.9 ± 0.1 a | 7.3 ± 0.2 a | 7.0 ± 0.5 a | 6.5 ± 0.2 a |
| SA/APP | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | 8.2 ± 0.2 a | 7.8 ± 0.4 b | 7.3 ± 0.3 a | 5.5 ± 0.1 b | 4.5 ± 0.6 b | 2.5 ± 0.5 b |
| SA | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | 8.0 ± 0.1 a | 7.6 ± 0.7 b | 6.8 ± 0.2 b | 4.2 ± 0.2 c | 2.5 ± 0.4 c | 1.0 ± 0.2 c |
| PE | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | 8.4 ± 0.3 a | 7.5 ± 0.2 b | 6.3 ± 0.4 b | 4.0 ± 0.4 c | 1.0 ± 0.2 d | 1.0 ± 0.3 c |
| Air control | 9.0 ± 0.1 a | 7.8 ± 0.1 b | 6.0 ± 0.1 c | 4.2 ± 0.3 c | 3.1 ± 0.2 d | 1.3 ± 0.3 d | 1.1 ± 0.1 c |
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in each column of data (p < 0.05, n = 5).
Figure 7Picture of strawberries during 12 days of strawberry storage.
Figure 8(a) Decay rate, (b) weight loss, (c) firmness, (d) titratable acidity, (e) pH, (f) soluble solids and (g) VC of strawberries during 12 storage.