| Literature DB >> 32940424 |
Cayetano Pleguezuelos-Manzano1,2, Jens Puschhof1,2, Stieneke van den Brink1,2, Veerle Geurts1,2, Joep Beumer1,2, Hans Clevers1,2,3.
Abstract
Human intestinal organoids derived from adult stem cells are miniature ex vivo versions of the human intestinal epithelium. Intestinal organoids are useful tools for the study of intestinal physiology as well as many disease conditions. These organoids present numerous advantages compared to immortalized cell lines, but working with them requires dedicated techniques. The protocols described in this article provide a basic guide to establishment and maintenance of human intestinal organoids derived from small intestine and colon biopsies. Additionally, this article provides an overview of several downstream applications of human intestinal organoids.Entities:
Keywords: adult stem cells; human intestinal organoids; organoid cryopreservation; organoid culture establishment; organoid differentiation; organoid immunofluorescence; organoid passage; single-cell clonal organoid culture; specialized organoid reagents
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32940424 PMCID: PMC9285512 DOI: 10.1002/cpim.106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc Immunol ISSN: 1934-3671
Figure 1Establishment of human colon organoid lines from fresh biopsy of normal tissue. Representative images from two organoid lines. Cells are shown after establishment of cultures (left), before the first split (middle), and after the first split (right). P indicates passage number; d indicates days after seeding or passage; scale bars, 0.5 mm.
Figure 2Mechanical splitting and expansion of human intestinal organoids. (A) Schematic of culture procedure. (B) Glass Pasteur pipette connected to a 10‐μl tip used for mechanical disruption of organoids. (C) Representative bright‐field microscopy images of organoid cultures at days 0, 1, 2, and 4 after mechanical split. Scale bars, 2 mm. (D) Examples of a healthy organoid (top), composed mostly of stem/transit amplifying cells, and a suboptimal organoid (bottom), with signs of differentiation (thickening of wall). Scale bars, 0.4 mm.
BME Volumes Used in Different Multiwell Plate Formats
| Plate format | BME/well (μl) | Domes/well | Culture medium/well (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 wells | 200 | 10‐15 | 2 |
| 12 wells | 100 | 5‐7 | 1 |
| 24 wells | 50 | 1‐3 | 0.5 |
| 48 wells | 25 | 1 | 0.25 |
| 96 wells | 5‐10 | 1 | 0.1 |
Intestinal Differentiation Media and Expected Cell‐Type Compositions ,
| Medium | Reference | Expected outcome | Special considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENR | Sato et al. ( | Enterocytes, EECs, TACs, goblet cells | Generic differentiation medium for broad coverage of differentiated cell types, with particular enrichment of enterocytes |
| ENR+Notchi | Goblet cells | Goblet cell differentiation | |
| ENR+MEKi+Notchi | Beumer et al. ( | EECs (crypt/lower villus state) | Enteroendocrine cell differentiation inducing a crypt hormone profile |
| ER+MEKi+Notchi+ BMP4+BMP2 | Beumer et al. ( | EECs (upper villus state) | Enteroendocrine cell differentiation inducing an upper villus hormone profile |
For full composition of media, see Reagents and Solutions.
Abbreviations: BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; EEC, enteroendocrine cell; ENR, EGF‐Noggin‐Rspo1; MEK, p38 MAP kinase; TAC, transit‐amplifying cell.
Figure 3Differentiation of human intestinal organoids. (A) Representative images of organoids differentiated towards the enteroendocrine cell lineage as in Beumer et al. (2020). Scale bars, 0.2 mm. (B) Representative images of organoids differentiated towards the enterocyte lineage. Scale bars, 0.4 mm. Inset: Detail of differentiated organoid with enterocytes (elongated cells, arrowhead). Scale bar, 0.1 mm.
Figure 4Confocal immunofluorescence images of human intestinal organoids cultured under expansion conditions. DAPI, nuclei; KI67, proliferation marker; phalloidin, F‐actin staining. Scale bar, 0.1 mm.
Figure 5Clonal expansion of human intestinal organoid cultures. (A) Schematic of process. (B) Gating strategy for sorting of living cells used for clonal organoid outgrowth. Cells in P3 gate were sorted and seeded. (C) Single‐cell organoid outgrowth after 10 days. Arrowhead indicates organoid of proper size for picking. Scale bar, 2 mm. (D) Organoid fragments after trypsinization of a single picked organoid. Scale bars, 1 mm (left) and 0.4 mm (inset at right).
Troubleshooting Guide
| Observation | Possible cause(s) | Suggested solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Organoids do not grow after isolation and establishment of line | Low quality; biopsy was incubated too long at 4°C or was frozen | Minimize time between biopsy and establishment of line |
| Biopsy was incubated too long in dissociation medium | Try to minimize the dissociation time | |
| Did not add RhoKi to the expansion medium | Add RhoKi to medium | |
| Organoids stop growing | Wnt3A‐CM and Rspo1‐CM batches do not provide optimal Wnt pathway activation | Test batches in organoids cultures before using in relevant cultures |
| Alternatively, test media using Wnt reporter cell lines | ||
| Organoid biomass lost at passage | Organoids trapped in foam generated during mechanical dissociation or in the filter of the Pasteur pipette |
Avoid foam formation by pipetting against tube wall; be careful not to let suspension reach the pipette filter when performing mechanical disruption |
| Organoids lost during staining | Organoids did not settle by gravity | Make sure that most of the organoids have settled before removing supernatant; a quick spin in a benchtop centrifuge (2 s) may help |
| Organoids adhered to plastic tip during last transfer | Use low‐binding tips coated with FBS | |
| Organoids fail to differentiate (maintain cystic morphology) | Stem cell factors were not washed away properly before differentiation |
Starting with a fresh organoid culture in expansion medium, increase the number of 15‐min wash cycles (up to three). Make sure to change medium 1 day after induction of differentiation. |
| Differentiation medium was not freshly prepared | Make fresh medium prior to experiment | |
| Differentiation components are missing | Check that all components were added to differentiation medium | |
| Excessively dark organoid morphology after differentiation | Cell death due to growth pathway inhibition/lack of expansion signals | Adjust inhibitor concentrations; assess other organoid lines for better differentiation capacity |
| Background after antibody staining | Residual BME attached to organoids after collection | Incubate longer in Cell Recovery Solution; use dispase as an alternative method |
| Antibody concentration not optimal | Optimize antibody concentration | |
| Permeabilization not optimal | Adjust permeabilization time | |
| Low single‐cell outgrowth efficiency | Not enough Wnt activation | Optimize Wnt source and concentration |
| Seeding density too low | Optimize seeding density | |
| Trypsinization time was too long | Stop trypsinization after a maximum of 5 min | |
| Non‐clonal organoid outgrowth (detected by WGS or imaging) | Single cells seeded at too high density, leading to organoid fusion | Seed cells at lower density and check daily under a microscope; make sure to pick only one organoid at a time |