Literature DB >> 32939750

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with increased cost in higher risk thin melanoma.

Taylor J Aiken1, Christopher C Stahl1, Patrick B Schwartz1, James Barrett1, Alexandra W Acher1, Deborah Lemaster1, Glen Leverson1, Sharon Weber1, Heather Neuman1, Daniel E Abbott1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) be discussed with patients with thin melanoma at higher risk for lymph node metastasis (T1b or T1a with positive deep margins, lymphovascular invasion, or high mitotic index). We examined the association between SLNB and resource utilization in this cohort.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent wide local excision for higher risk thin melanomas from 2009 to 2018 at a tertiary care center. Patients who underwent SLNB were compared to those who did not undergo SLNB with regard to resource utilization, including total hospital cost.
RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the analysis and 50 patients (71.4%) underwent SLNB. SLNB was associated with increased hospital costs ($6700 vs. $3767; p < .01) and increased operative time (68.5 vs. 36.0 min; p < .01). This cost difference persisted in multivariable regression (p < .01). Of patients who underwent successful SLN mapping, 3 out of 49 patients had a positive SLN (6.1%). The cost to identify a single positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) was $47,906.
CONCLUSION: In patients with a higher risk of thin melanoma, SLNB is associated with increased cost despite a low likelihood of SLN positivity. These data better inform patient-provider discussions as the role of SLNB in thin melanoma evolves.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospital cost; melanoma; resource utilization; sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939750      PMCID: PMC7770044          DOI: 10.1002/jso.26225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  22 in total

1.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effect of the AJCC 7th edition change in T1 melanoma substaging on national utilization and outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Travis E Grotz; Nneka I Comfere; Jonathan W Inselman; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander M M Eggermont; Christian U Blank; Mario Mandala; Georgina V Long; Victoria Atkinson; Stéphane Dalle; Andrew Haydon; Mikhail Lichinitser; Adnan Khattak; Matteo S Carlino; Shahneen Sandhu; James Larkin; Susana Puig; Paolo A Ascierto; Piotr Rutkowski; Dirk Schadendorf; Rutger Koornstra; Leonel Hernandez-Aya; Michele Maio; Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh; Jean-Jacques Grob; Ralf Gutzmer; Rahima Jamal; Paul Lorigan; Nageatte Ibrahim; Sandrine Marreaud; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Stefan Suciu; Caroline Robert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; Alistair J Cochran; John F Thompson; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Edwin C Glass; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; He-jing Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Mortality burden and prognosis of thin melanomas overall and by subcategory of thickness, SEER registry data, 1992-2013.

Authors:  Shoshana M Landow; Annie Gjelsvik; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Mitotic rate as a predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with thin melanomas.

Authors:  Susan B Kesmodel; Giorgos C Karakousis; Jeffrey D Botbyl; Robert J Canter; Robert T Lewis; Peter M Wahl; Kyla P Terhune; Abass Alavi; David E Elder; Michael E Ming; DuPont Guerry; Phyllis A Gimotty; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Francis R Spitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of stage III melanoma: long-term follow-up results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 double-blind phase 3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Alexander M M Eggermont; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Jean-Jacques Grob; Reinhard Dummer; Jedd D Wolchok; Henrik Schmidt; Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Jon M Richards; Celeste Lebbe; Virginia Ferraresi; Michael Smylie; Jeffrey S Weber; Michele Maio; Fareeda Hosein; Veerle de Pril; Michal Kicinski; Stefan Suciu; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Yongwu Shao; Eric J Feuer; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas.

Authors:  Doreen M Agnese; Shahab F Abdessalam; William E Burak; Cynthia M Magro; Rodney V Pozderac; Michael J Walker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weber; Mario Mandala; Michele Del Vecchio; Helen J Gogas; Ana M Arance; C Lance Cowey; Stéphane Dalle; Michael Schenker; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Jean-Jacques Grob; Marcus O Butler; Mark R Middleton; Michele Maio; Victoria Atkinson; Paola Queirolo; Rene Gonzalez; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Michael Smylie; Nicolas Meyer; Laurent Mortier; Michael B Atkins; Georgina V Long; Shailender Bhatia; Celeste Lebbé; Piotr Rutkowski; Kenji Yokota; Naoya Yamazaki; Tae M Kim; Veerle de Pril; Javier Sabater; Anila Qureshi; James Larkin; Paolo A Ascierto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group.

Authors:  Aaron S Farberg; Justin W Marson; Alex Glazer; Graham H Litchman; Ryan Svoboda; Richard R Winkelmann; Nicholas Brownstone; Darrell S Rigel
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.