Literature DB >> 25647736

The effect of the AJCC 7th edition change in T1 melanoma substaging on national utilization and outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Tina J Hieken1, Travis E Grotz, Nneka I Comfere, Jonathan W Inselman, Elizabeth B Habermann.   

Abstract

T1 melanomas, despite their favorable prognosis, account for 25% of melanoma deaths. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition melanoma staging, implemented in 2010, replaced the level of invasion with the mitotic rate for T1 substaging, on the basis of prognostic modeling, not prediction of occult lymph node metastasis. Previously, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was recommended for T1b patients, whereas current guidelines suggest SLNB for select high-risk T1 melanomas. We investigated the effect of this staging change on the performance and outcomes of SLNB for T1 melanoma. Using 2004-2010 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry, we identified 32 527 cases of T1 melanoma and compared pre-2010 (N=27 170) with 2010 (N=5357) data. We used χ-tests, t-tests, and logistic regression models for analysis. After implementation of the 2010 AJCC staging system, SLNB for T1 patients increased from 12.1% (2004) to 14.4% (2010), despite a decrease for T1b melanomas (40.9 to 33.3%; both P values<0.001), and there was no change in SLNB for melanomas that were 0.7 mm or thicker (38.3 and 39.3%). T-stage, thickness, level, ulceration, age, and geographic region were correlated with SLNB performance (all P values<0.001). For T1 patients, overall SLN positivity rates were 6.1% pre-2010 and 7.8% in 2010 (P=0.12), while nearly doubling for T1a patients (3.6 to 6.6%, P=0.03). SLN-positive patients had diminished cancer-specific survival (P<0.001). SLNB for T1b melanomas decreased after AJCC T1 reclassification, without changing for melanomas that were 0.7 mm or thicker. SLN positivity rates increased for T1a melanomas, and SLN status was prognostic for T1 patients. Improved strategies to identify high-risk T1 melanoma patients most likely to benefit from SLN surgery and to minimize clinical practice variation would be valuable.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25647736     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  15 in total

1.  Improving Melanoma Path Reports: the Importance of Histopathological Parameters in Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Alina Mariana Avram; Olga Dana Simionescu; Mariana Costache; Mariana Grigore
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

2.  Miscoding of Melanoma Thickness in SEER: Research and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Phyllis A Gimotty; Ronald Shore; Nancy L Lozon; Jeanne Whitlock; Sidan He; Fawn D Vigneau; Lois Dickie; David E Elder; Xiaowei Xu; Ann G Schwartz; DuPont Guerry
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Early Melanoma Nodal Positivity and Biopsy Rates Before and After Implementation of the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

Authors:  Chelsea Isom; Lee Wheless; Mary A Hooks; Rondi M Kauffmann
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Identification of stage I/IIA melanoma patients at high risk for disease relapse using a clinicopathologic and gene expression model.

Authors:  Alexander M M Eggermont; Domenico Bellomo; Suzette M Arias-Mejias; Enrica Quattrocchi; Sindhuja Sominidi-Damodaran; Alina G Bridges; Julia S Lehman; Tina J Hieken; James W Jakub; Dennis H Murphree; Mark R Pittelkow; Jason C Sluzevich; Mark A Cappel; Sanjay P Bagaria; Charles Perniciaro; Félicia J Tjien-Fooh; Barbara Rentroia-Pacheco; Renske Wever; Martin H van Vliet; Jvalini Dwarkasing; Alexander Meves
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Stratifying SLN incidence in intermediate thickness melanoma patients.

Authors:  James M Chang; Heidi E Kosiorek; Amylou C Dueck; Stanley P L Leong; John T Vetto; Richard L White; Eli Avisar; Vernon K Sondak; Jane L Messina; Jonathan S Zager; Carlos Garberoglio; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  How staging of thin melanoma is changed after the introduction of TNM 7th edition: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  A Caldarella; L Fancelli; G Manneschi; A Chiarugi; P Nardini; E Crocetti
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  The changing landscape of dermatology practice: melanoma and pump-probe laser microscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Puza; Paul J Mosca
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 8.  Essential Components of Melanoma Histopathological Reporting: The Surgical Oncologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Vinka Nurdjaja; Masato Yozu; Jon A Mathy
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Model Combining Tumor Molecular and Clinicopathologic Risk Factors Predicts Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Domenico Bellomo; Suzette M Arias-Mejias; Chandru Ramana; Joel B Heim; Enrica Quattrocchi; Sindhuja Sominidi-Damodaran; Alina G Bridges; Julia S Lehman; Tina J Hieken; James W Jakub; Mark R Pittelkow; David J DiCaudo; Barbara A Pockaj; Jason C Sluzevich; Mark A Cappel; Sanjay P Bagaria; Charles Perniciaro; Félicia J Tjien-Fooh; Martin H van Vliet; Jvalini Dwarkasing; Alexander Meves
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-14

10.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with increased cost in higher risk thin melanoma.

Authors:  Taylor J Aiken; Christopher C Stahl; Patrick B Schwartz; James Barrett; Alexandra W Acher; Deborah Lemaster; Glen Leverson; Sharon Weber; Heather Neuman; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.