Literature DB >> 15864482

Mitotic rate as a predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with thin melanomas.

Susan B Kesmodel1, Giorgos C Karakousis, Jeffrey D Botbyl, Robert J Canter, Robert T Lewis, Peter M Wahl, Kyla P Terhune, Abass Alavi, David E Elder, Michael E Ming, DuPont Guerry, Phyllis A Gimotty, Douglas L Fraker, Brian J Czerniecki, Francis R Spitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) provide important prognostic information for patients with early-stage melanoma. Although the use of this technique in patients with thin melanomas (< or =1.00 mm) is not routine, risk factors that may predict sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in this patient population are under investigation. We sought to determine whether mitotic rate (MR) is associated with SLN positivity in thin-melanoma patients and, therefore, whether it may be used to risk-stratify and select patients for LM/SL.
METHODS: Clinical and histopathologic variables were reviewed for 181 patients with thin melanomas who underwent LM/SL from January 1996 through January 2004. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with SLN positivity. Risk groups were defined on the basis of the development of a classification tree.
RESULTS: The overall SLN positivity rate was 5%. All patients with positive SLNs had an MR of >0. By univariate analysis, MR and thickness were significant predictors of SLN positivity. The association between MR and SLN positivity remained significant controlling for each of the other variables evaluated. On the basis of a classification tree, patients with an MR >0 and tumor thickness > or =.76 mm were identified as a higher-risk group, with an SLN positivity rate of 12.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with thin melanomas, MR >0 seems to be a significant predictor of SLN positivity that may be used to risk-stratify and select patients for LM/SL. To confirm these results, the predictive value of MR for SLN positivity needs to be validated in other populations of thin-melanoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864482     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  42 in total

Review 1.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Seng-Jaw Soong; Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shouluan Ding; Daniel G Coit; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy Johnson; Marcella M Johnson; Stanley P Leong; Merrick I Ross; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M Eggermont; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Shukui Qin; Jun Liang; Tongyu Lin; Lu Si; Xiaohong Chen; Zhihong Chi; Chuanliang Cui; Nan Du; Yun Fan; Kangsheng Gu; Fang Li; Junling Li; Yongheng Li; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Man Lu; Aiping Lu; Kejun Nan; Xiaohui Niu; Hongming Pan; Guoxin Ren; Xiubao Ren; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Min Tao; Baocheng Wang; Wenbin Wei; Di Wu; Lingying Wu; Aiwen Wu; Xiaolin Xu; Junyi Zhang; Xiaoshi Zhang; Yiping Zhang; Huiyan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Current treatment of locoregional recurrence of melanoma.

Authors:  Malcolm Hart Squires; Keith A Delman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Analysis of tumor mitotic rate in thin metastatic melanomas compared with thin melanomas without metastasis using both the hematoxylin and eosin and anti-phosphohistone 3 IHC stain.

Authors:  Sumeet Thareja; Jonathan S Zager; Divya Sadhwani; Shalini Thareja; Ren Chen; Suroosh Marzban; Drazen M Jukic; Lewis F Glass; Jane Messina
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  Clark level risk stratifies patients with mitogenic thin melanomas for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Phyllis A Gimotty; Andrew J Sinnamon; Heather Wachtel; Robert E Roses; Lynn Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; David E Elder; Michael Ming; Rosalie Elenitsas; DuPont Guerry; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Changes in the presentation of nodular and superficial spreading melanomas over 35 years.

Authors:  Melanie A Warycha; Paul J Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Farbod Darvishian; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; Alfred W Kopf; David Polsky; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Melanoma in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients.

Authors:  John M Kirkwood; Drazen M Jukic; Bruce J Averbook; Leonard S Sender
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Tumor Cell Adhesion As a Risk Factor for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander Meves; Ekaterina Nikolova; Joel B Heim; Edwin J Squirewell; Mark A Cappel; Mark R Pittelkow; Clark C Otley; Nille Behrendt; Ditte M Saunte; Jorgen Lock-Andersen; Louis A Schenck; Amy L Weaver; Vera J Suman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.