Literature DB >> 29658430

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma.

Alexander M M Eggermont1, Christian U Blank1, Mario Mandala1, Georgina V Long1, Victoria Atkinson1, Stéphane Dalle1, Andrew Haydon1, Mikhail Lichinitser1, Adnan Khattak1, Matteo S Carlino1, Shahneen Sandhu1, James Larkin1, Susana Puig1, Paolo A Ascierto1, Piotr Rutkowski1, Dirk Schadendorf1, Rutger Koornstra1, Leonel Hernandez-Aya1, Michele Maio1, Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh1, Jean-Jacques Grob1, Ralf Gutzmer1, Rahima Jamal1, Paul Lorigan1, Nageatte Ibrahim1, Sandrine Marreaud1, Alexander C J van Akkooi1, Stefan Suciu1, Caroline Robert1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab has been found to prolong progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma. We conducted a phase 3 double-blind trial to evaluate pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma.
METHODS: Patients with completely resected stage III melanoma were randomly assigned (with stratification according to cancer stage and geographic region) to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab (514 patients) or placebo (505 patients) intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses (approximately 1 year) or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Recurrence-free survival in the overall intention-to-treat population and in the subgroup of patients with cancer that was positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) were the primary end points. Safety was also evaluated.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15 months, pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer recurrence-free survival than placebo in the overall intention-to-treat population (1-year rate of recurrence-free survival, 75.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 71.3 to 78.9] vs. 61.0% [95% CI, 56.5 to 65.1]; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.57; 98.4% CI, 0.43 to 0.74; P<0.001) and in the subgroup of 853 patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (1-year rate of recurrence-free survival, 77.1% [95% CI, 72.7 to 80.9] in the pembrolizumab group and 62.6% [95% CI, 57.7 to 67.0] in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.69; P<0.001). Adverse events of grades 3 to 5 that were related to the trial regimen were reported in 14.7% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 3.4% of patients in the placebo group. There was one treatment-related death due to myositis in the pembrolizumab group.
CONCLUSIONS: As adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage III melanoma, 200 mg of pembrolizumab administered every 3 weeks for up to 1 year resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival than placebo, with no new toxic effects identified. (Funded by Merck; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02362594 ; EudraCT number, 2014-004944-37 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29658430     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  398 in total

1.  Survivorship in immune therapy: Assessing toxicities, body composition and health-related quality of life among long-term survivors treated with antibodies to programmed death-1 receptor and its ligand.

Authors:  James Randall Patrinely; Arissa C Young; Henry Quach; Grant R Williams; Fei Ye; Run Fan; Leora Horn; Kathryn E Beckermann; Erin A Gillaspie; Jeffrey A Sosman; Debra L Friedman; Javid J Moslehi; Douglas B Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  The Evolution of Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Justine V Cohen; Elizabeth I Buchbinder
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Impact of PD-L1 expression and human papillomavirus status in anti-PD1/PDL1 immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaimin J Patel; Dylan A Levy; Shaun A Nguyen; Hannah M Knochelmann; Terry A Day
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Maiko Wada-Ohno; Takamichi Ito; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-24

5.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

Authors:  Robyn D Gartrell; Douglas K Marks; Emanuelle M Rizk; Margaret Bogardus; Camille L Gérard; Luke W Barker; Yichun Fu; Camden L Esancy; Gen Li; Jiayi Ji; Shumin Rui; Marc S Ernstoff; Bret Taback; Sarabjot Pabla; Rui Chang; Sandra J Lee; John J Krolewski; Carl Morrison; Basil A Horst; Yvonne M Saenger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Cellular therapy against public neoantigens.

Authors:  Paul M Armistead
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Therapeutic Advancements Across Clinical Stages in Melanoma, With a Focus on Targeted Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Claudia Trojaniello; Jason J Luke; Paolo A Ascierto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Primary excision margins, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and completion lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  F C Wright; L H Souter; S Kellett; A Easson; C Murray; J Toye; D McCready; C Nessim; D Ghazarian; N J Look Hong; S Johnson; D P Goldstein; T Petrella
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  What is the Cost-Effective Treatment for Melanoma Patients with a Positive Sentinel Node?

Authors:  Hayley Standage; Alyssa R Hersh; Aaron Caughey; Matthew Taylor; John Vetto; Dale Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.