Literature DB >> 32933238

"Suicide CARE" (Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea): An Update.

Seon-Cheol Park1, Kyoung-Sae Na2, Sun-Jung Kwon3, Minjae Kim4, Hyoung-Jun Kim5, Myungjae Baik6, Jinmi Seol5, Eun Ji An7, Sang Min Lee8, Eun-Jin Lee9, Meerae Lim5, Sung Joon Cho10, Gwang Hun Kim11, Nari Kim8, Hong Jin Jeon12, Jong-Woo Paik8, Kang Seob Oh10, Hwa-Young Lee13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2011, "Suicide CARE" (Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea) was originally developed for the early detection of warning signs of suicide completion, since there is a tendency to regard emotional suppression as a virtue of Korean traditional culture. A total of 1.2 million individuals completed the training program of "Suicide CARE" in Korea.
METHODS: More sophisticated suicide prevention approaches according to age, sex, and occupation have been proposed, demanding for a more detailed revision of "Suicide CARE." Thus, during the period from August 2019 to February 2020, "Suicide CARE" has been updated to version 2.0. The assessments on domestic gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention, international gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention, psychological autopsy interview reports between 2015 and 2018, and the evaluation of feedback from people who completed "Suicide CARE" version 1.6 training were performed.
RESULTS: We describe the revision process of "Suicide CARE," revealing that "Suicide CARE" version 2.0 has been developed using an evidence-based methodology.
CONCLUSION: It is expected that "Suicide CARE" version 2.0 be positioned as the basic framework for many developing gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention in Korea in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gatekeeper Intervention; Korea; Revision; Suicide Prevention Program; “Suicide CARE”

Year:  2020        PMID: 32933238      PMCID: PMC7538250          DOI: 10.30773/pi.2020.0166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Investig        ISSN: 1738-3684            Impact factor:   2.505


INTRODUCTION

Suicide is the most important public mental health issue in Korea [1-4]. From 2003 to 2016, Korea has reported the highest suicide rate among the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Since Lithuania joined the OECD in 2017, the highest suicide rate among the OECD countries, in just a year, was reported by Lithuania. Thus, Korea reported the second-highest suicide rate among the OECD countries. However, the statistics for suicide have remained troubling, as follows: As of 2018, the death rate due to suicide per 100,000 persons was 26.6 in Korea, which was much higher than the average suicide death rate of 11.6 in the other OECD countries [5]. Recently, the “National Suicide Prevention Action Plan” of Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea has aimed to reduce suicide death rate to less than 20 per 100,000 persons by 2022 and total completed suicides to less than 10,000 persons per year [6]. A recent systematic review reported that restricting access to lethal means and conducting school-based awareness programs were sufficiently evidenced to prevent suicide. In addition, effective pharmacological and psychological treatments for depression, gatekeeper training, education of physicians, and internet and helpline support have been proposed as evidence-based suicide prevention strategies. However, screening in primary care and general public education and media guidelines are insufficiently evidenced in the prevention of suicide [7]. Most importantly, gatekeeper training has been considered to be an effective suicide prevention strategy for young people by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. In terms of gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention, social workers, caregivers, and churchmen should identify people with a high risk of suicidality and connect them with psychosocial support systems [8]. In Korea, evidence-based suicide prevention strategies have been developed as follows: The first suicide prevention program for the members of the Korean Medical Association was held in 2010. In addition, in terms of gatekeeper training, the Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea was originally developed by the Korea Association for Suicide Prevention, under the support of the Life Insurance Philanthropy Foundation in 2011 [9]. Thus, “Suicide CARE” was developed for the early detection of danger signals of suicide completion, since there is a tendency to regard emotional suppression as a virtue of Korean traditional culture. The gatekeeper training program has been popularly referred to as “Bo-Deud-Mal (Bogo Deudgo Malhagi)” in Korean and translated to “Suicide CARE” (“Careful observation,” “Active listening,” and “Risk evaluation and Expert referral”) in English. “Suicide CARE” provides specific guidelines regarding gatekeeper intervention for people with a high risk of suicide. In addition, the gatekeeper training program has been divided into three parts according to the name as follows: “Careful observation” covers the detection of verbal and non-verbal signals for suicidal intents. “Active listening” aims to actively hear the cause of suicidal intention, and “Risk evaluation and Expert referral “ involves referring suicidal persons to psychiatric professionals. After the first demonstration of “Suicide CARE” in January 2013, an executive committee, which consisted of its developing team, was established by the Korea Suicide Prevention Center. Based on the principle that any individual could complete the program free of charge, education was mainly provided through community mental health welfare centers nationwide. The instructors were limited to mental health professionals with more than two years of suicide prevention work experience, and they completed a 2-day course of “Suicide CARE” with faculty supervision. Instructors were provided with instructor manuals with detailed information on contents, and gatekeepers were provided with the contents of workbooks, video clips, and role plays. It was designed to simulate the experience of the activity. The certificates of completion for “Suicide CARE” were downloaded through the website of the Korea Suicide Prevention Center (adapted from http://www.spckorea.or.kr/index.php). By 2019, 1.2 million individuals had completed life-saving education [10]. In addition, the gatekeeper training program was revised to provide individually differentiated programs focusing on specific groups, including young people, office workers, and the army, navy, and air forces, under the support of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, in 2014. The revised version number of the gatekeeper training program was marked as 1.6 (not 2.0) because the revisions made were modest. “Suicide CARE” version 1.6 consists of a workbook, transcript of the lecture, and video clips to improve gatekeeper training [11]. As shown in Figure 1, each part named “Careful observation,” “Active listening,” and “Risk evaluation and Expert referral” is represented by an individual image, in “Suicide CARE” versions 1.0 and 1.6, respectively [9,11]. A telephone survey of 800 people who had completed the educational course of the program in 2013 reported that the gatekeeper’s intervention for suicide prevention could be favorably supported by “Suicide CARE” version 1.6 [10]. Owing to the considerable amount of time since its initial creation, it was required that “Suicide CARE” should be revised entirely. It is also necessary that the revised gatekeeper training program should be underpinned by current study findings and empirical knowledge. In addition, the gatekeeper training program must be revised based on psychological autopsy interview findings [12] in the most recent 5 years in Korea. Since suicide has been the most common cause of death among those in their 10s, 20s, and 30s, and the second most common among those in their 40s to 50s in Korea, it has been presumed that the development of age-group-based differentiated suicide prevention approaches is urgently needed. Thus, “Suicide CARE” was revised from version 1.6 to 2.0, between August 2019 and February 2020, by the multidisciplinary team including psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers. The revision has been mainly based on the numerous domestic and international gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention and the recent psychological autopsy findings of Korea. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to present the detailed revision process of “Suicide CARE” from version 1.6 to 2.0.
Figure 1.

Image representing “Careful observation,” “Active listening,” and “Risk evaluation and Expert referral” in “Suicide CARE” versions 1.0 and 1.6. Adapted from “Suicide CARE” (Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea) version 1.5 Workbook. Seoul: Korea Association for Suicide Prevention & Korea Suicide Prevention Center, 2014, according to the Creative Commons license. [9,13] From left to right, characterized images symbolize the “Careful observation,” “Active listening,” and “Risk evaluation and Expert referral” parts.

METHODS

Under the support of Korea Suicide Prevention Center, which is a designated agency of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, during the period from August 2019 to March 2020, “Suicide CARE” has been revised from version 1.6 to 2.0. The revision process consisted of: 1) reviews about domestic gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention, 2) reviews about international gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention, 3) reviews about psychological autopsy interview reports, 2018, and 4) reviews about feedback from persons who completed “Suicide CARE” version 1.6.

RESULTS

Domestic gatekeeper training programs

As shown in Table 1, the Korea Suicide Prevention Center has managed a registration system for domestic gatekeeper training programs to introduce evidence-based suicide prevention interventions [13]. In addition, the Korea Suicide Prevention Center has certified the evidence levels of domestic gatekeeper training programs. Thus, 68 different programs have been certified. The certification criteria are classified into SECTION 1, SECTION 2, and SECTION 3 as follows: SECTION 1 denotes the suicide prevention intervention in which the content and efficacy are evidenced by a structured empirical study (randomized controlled study or non-randomized controlled study). SECTION 2 denotes expert consensus-based interventions or recommendations in the general setting. SECTION 3 denotes interventions or recommendations in special settings (i.e., public awareness and promotion programs, education or training programs, protocols or guidelines, and screening tools). A review of the current domestic gatekeeper training programs reveals the following limitations: First, as shown in Table 1, most of the domestic gatekeeper training programs were certified as low-level. Among 68 different programs, 89.7% (n=61) were defined as SECTION 3, whereas 8.8% (n=6) were defined as SECTION 2. Only 1.5% (n=1) of the programs was defined as SECTION 1, according to the criteria of the Korea Suicide Prevention Center [16]. Second, it has been speculated that the domestic gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention are in a state of contention with many differing views. In addition, more than half of the programs were developed by institutions located in the National Capital region (i.e., Seoul, Incheon, Gyeonggi-do). Most of the domestic gatekeeper training programs are available only for targeted regional residents and not for non-targeted regional residents. Thus, to overcome these limitations, it has been suggested that a new domestic gatekeeper training program with a high level of evidence and a national range of availability should be developed. Most programs commonly focus on enhancing gatekeepers’ understanding of the risk and protective factors of suicide to connect highrisk suicidal persons with mental professionals early. In addition, all programs are free of charge. Herein, it has been proposed that the revised version of “Suicide CARE” should be supported by high-level evidence available nation-wide and focused on gatekeepers’ early detection and management of suicidal risk.
Table 1.

Domestic gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention

ProgramDevelopment institutionHighlightSECTION
Suicide Reporting Recommendation Guideline 3.0 [14]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterPrinciples of suicide-related reporting2
Suicide Prevention Education Program for Senior Service Provider [15]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterEducate senior service providers on the characteristics of elderly and risk factors of elderly suicide3
Cognitive Behavioral Program for Suicidal Attempter [16]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand cognitive distortion, automatic thoughts, and emotional response and behavior of suicide attempters, education on cognitive behavioral programs for prevention of suicidal reattempts3
‘Suicide CARE’ for Air Force [17]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterSuicide prevention education program for the air force, understanding of suicide, and training gatekeepers of air force3
Senior Suicide Prevention Education Program [18]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand geriatric depression and suicide, Improve awareness on senior suicide prevention3
Suicide Prevention Education Program for Office Worker [19]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand the risk factors of suicide, self-assessment, and suicidal signs, conduct suicide prevention interventions3
Suicide Prevention Education for Emergency Medical Worker [20]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand psychiatric assessment and interview principles of suicide, introduce suicide screening tools and suicide-related pharmacotherapy and physical restraints, conduct suicide-related emergency medical services3
Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Education Program [21]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand high-risk suicidal groups, detect high-risk suicidal groups, educate helping skills of gatekeepers3
Senior Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Education Program [22]Korea Suicide Prevention CenterEducate on suicide prevention for the elderly, train gatekeepers, enhance the mental health of the elderly3
Crisis Management Protocol for Suicide and Mental Disorder [23]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterIntegrated crisis management service system, continuous management service system for mental hospitals and community mental health welfare centers2
Suicide Crisis Intervention Handbook [24]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterSystemize the intervention strategies through understanding suicide, education on suicidal risk assessment, 6-step counseling and intervention skills3
Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program [25]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand suicide, establish strategies for suicide prevention, gatekeeper work activity3
Manual for Counseling and Self-Help Group for Survivor of Bereavement by Suicide [26]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand counseling and self-help groups for bereaved survivors of suicide2
Suicide Prevention Education for Emergency Worker [27]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterEnhance gatekeepers’ intervention skills for high suicidality, control the quality of community-based suicide prevention services3
Suicide Prevention Professional Training Program [28]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterUnderstand skill, application, and supervision of motivation enhancement interviews3
Gatekeeper Training Program for Teacher [29]Seoul Suicide Prevention CenterTrain teachers on suicide risk assessment of adolescents3
Adolescent Suicide Crisis Intervention Manual for Teacher and Official [30]Incheon Suicide Prevention CenterBe aware of problem of adolescent suicide, prevent adolescent suicide, provide for adolescents with suicidality, interconnection of adolescent-related institutions3
School-Based Suicide Postvention Program [31]Seoul Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand the psychological conflicts about school-related suicide3
Suicide Prevention Program of Community Resident Participation [32]Gangseo-gu Mental Health Welfare Center, SeoulDetect suicide problems within the community, establish leadership, increase community resident suicide prevention activities3
Mental Health Promotion and Happiness Enhancement Thank You Program [33]Seongdong-gu Mental Health Welfare Center, SeoulThrough increasing positive emotions, decrease suicidality of psychiatric patients with suicidal ideation, suicidal attempters, and bereaved survivors of suicide3
‘Mind Cane’ [34]Busan Mental Health Welfare Center10-session cognitive behavioral therapy for elderly with depressive mood and suicidal ideation3
Psychological Emotion Support Recommendation for Official Whose Client Commit Suicide [35]Busan Mental Health Welfare CenterRecommend institution response (i.e., situation report, administrative management) and psychological emotional support (i.e., case supervision, work cooperation, vacation support, counseling support for psychological conflicts)2
Psychological Support for Survivor of Bereavement by Suicide [36]Incheon Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand bereaved survivors of suicide3
Senior Suicidal Crisis Management Manual [37]Incheon Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand suicide by elderly and interventions in actual practice3
‘Suicide Prevention and Crisis Intervention Manual’ for Suicide Prevention Official [38]Incheon Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand suicide, crisis management, emergency intervention principle, and case management2
Adolescent Life Respect Education [39]Daegu Mental Health Welfare CenterPrevent adolescent suicide, educate intervention skill for suicide3
Senior Life Respect Education Program, ‘Life Charger’ [40]Daegu Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand the definition of life chargers, detect suicidal ambivalence and signs3
Crisis Intervention Program of Gwangju [41]Gwangju Mental Health Welfare CenterDetect suicidal crisis signs, increase interviewing skills of suicide prevention officials3
‘Life Zone’ [42]Buk-gu Mental Health Welfare Center, GwangjuStructured education program for instructor training, train gatekeepers to help high-risk suicidal groups3
‘Mind Friends’ [43]Buk-gu Mental Health Welfare Center, GwangjuUnderstand the protective and risk factors of adolescent suicide and depressive symptoms3
‘What’s Up?’ [44]Dong-gu Mental Health Welfare Center, GwangjuUnderstand the suicidal risk of adolescents, understand suicidal signs3
Group Program Manual for Survivor of Bereavement by Suicide [45]Gyeonggi-do Mental Health Welfare CenterSystemize standardized service of a group program for the bereaved survivors of suicide, facilitate a group of the survivors of suicide in the community, provide an education program for grief3
Life Loving Teen Teen Class 3.0 [46]Gyeonggi-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand rational ideas about suicide, help an adolescent friend with suicide ideation1
Life Loving Teen Teen Class Gatekeeper [47]Gyeonggi-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand life-loving and the value of life3
Student Suicide Prevention Intervention Program, ‘M-love’ [48]Gyeonggi-do Mental Health Welfare CenterProvide an opportunity of emotional expression, return to ordinary life through a normal grief reaction3
Gold Medal Case Management Program [49]Suwon Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doDivide and construct goal behaviors into gold, silver, and bronze medals, based on conditioning theory3
Adolescent Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program, ‘Between Friends’ [50]Suwon Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doUnderstand the factors influencing suicidal ideation, suicidal signs, protective factors against suicide, and helping methods for friend3
Life Respect Manual [51]Seongnam Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doProblem-solving manual for persons with suicidal ideation3
Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Education Program [52]Seongnam Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doDevelop a suicide prevention gatekeeper education for citizens of Seongnam3
Support Guidebook for Survivor of Bereavement by Suicide [53]Seongnam Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doUnderstand community-based support services for bereaved survivors of suicide3
Life Respect Green Village [54]Hwaseong Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeonggi-doEquip a safe deposit box of agricultural chemicals3
Gatekeeper Training Program for Police Officer [55]Chuungcheongbuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterRecognize statistical data of police officer suicide3
Gatekeeper Training Program for Firefighter [56]Chuungcheongbuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterRecognize statistical data of firefighter suicide3
Emergency Kit Emergency Box [57]Chungchengbuk-do Mental Health Welfare Center1. Emergency kit (a tool to cope with physical emergency situations)3
2. Emergency box (suicidal risk assessment, crisis intervention, refer to medical institutions, and others)
‘Suicide Crisis Management Manual’ [58]Chungcheongbuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterSuicide crisis management manual for 112, 119, and community mental health welfare centers2
Life Savor Training Program [59]Chuungcheongbuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand suicide and suicide prevention3
Chungbuk Stop of Suicide (SOS) Project [60]Chungcheongbuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterSuicidal crisis intervention program for policemen, firefighters, and mental health welfare center officials3
Running Life [61]Chungcheongnam-do Mental Health Welfare CenterSuicide prevention education for adolescent, adults, and seniors3
Motivation Enhancement Cognitive Behavioral Program 2.0, ‘Empathy 3’ [62]Gumi Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeongsangbuk-doUnderstand suicidal intent, enhance life motivation, construct a safety net3
Short-term Intervention Program 2.0, ‘Empathy 1’ [63]Gumi Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeongsangbuk-doA short-term intervention program for suicide attempters and high-risk suicidal groups3
Peer Life Savor Training Program [64]Gumi Mental Health Welfare Center, Gyeongsangbuk-doEducate on the four phases including irrational belief phase, rational belief construction phase, rational behavior construction phase, and rational behavior acquirement phase3
Life Loving Gatekeeper Training Program and Instructor Training Program [65]Jeollabuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterIncrease understanding of suicide, detect suicidal signs, educate on interview skills and attitude and assessment and evaluation of crisis situations3
Suicide Prevention Program [66]Jeollabuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterImprove understanding of suicide for Jeollabuk-do people, reduce the suicide rate in Jeollabuk-do3
Life Loving Gatekeeper Professional Instructor Program [67]Jeollabuk-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand suicide and theory about suicide, educate on suicidal risk assessments3
‘Knocking Repeatedly’ [68]Wanju Mental Health Welfare Center, Jeollabuk-doReduce suicide ideation and depressive mood of high-risk suicide groups3
‘Hello?’ [69]Jeollanam-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand suicide, conduct early detect and early management of high-risk suicidal groups, decrease suicidal rate through fostering a life respecting culture3
Life Loving Gatekeeper Training Program [70]Jeju-do Mental Health Welfare CenterUnderstand the characteristics of elderly suicides, detect and help high-risk suicide groups3
Gatekeeper Education Program for Police Officer [71]Korea National Police AgencyRecognize suicidal risk of police officers, improve the connection with resources which provide appropriate help3
Suicidality Screening Program [72]Department of Epidemiology, The Catholic University of Korea, SeoulConduct community-based suicidality screening tests and refer persons with high-risk suicidality to mental health institutions3
TLC Academy, ‘Life Loving’ [73]Nazarene University, Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-doUnderstand suicide and suicide prevention programs, train counseling, conduct a suicide prevention campaign3
Life Saver Education Book [74]Life Respect Education Association, SeoulEducate psychology to respect life, educate suicide prevention for respect of life3
Adolescent Suicide Prevention Education Program, ‘I Love You’ [75]Life Line Korea, Samsung Life Insurance, Community Chest of Korea, Korea Health Promotion InstituteEducate intervention skill for adolescents with suicidal crises, educate school-based suicide prevention intervention3
Life Loving Gatekeeper Basic Education Program [76]Life Hope Protestant Suicide Prevention Center, SeoulSuicide prevention intervention program for adolescents3
Sexual Minority Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program [77]Korean Gay Humanity Movement OrganizationUnderstand suicidal signs and suicidal ideation of sexual minorities, improve self-help of gatekeepers3

Adapted from the Korea Suicide Prevention Center. Registration System for Domestic Gatekeeper Training Programs to Introduce Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention Interventions [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Suicide Prevention Center; 2020, according to the Creative commons license [16]

International gatekeeper training programs

Suicide Prevention Resource Center (SPRC), Resources and Programs (available from: http://www.sprc.org/resources-programs) [78] were searched from inception until October 30th, 2019. As shown in Table 2, we reviewed the international government-initiated suicide prevention programs, including the Office Worker Suicide Prevention Policy (World Health Organization), data from the Bureau of Labor in Quebec (Canada), Montreal police officer’s Together for Life (Canada), suicide prevention model for office workers (Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention), Victorian Work-Related Fatality Database (VWRFD) (Australia), MATES in Construction: construction worker suicide prevention (Australia), and others. In addition, we reviewed the international private corporate-initiated suicide prevention programs, including the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST), Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR), Working Minds, and others. We extracted common factors, characteristics, and availability in Korean contexts from the international gatekeeper training programs. Reviews of the international gatekeeper training programs presented major considerations as follows: First, each of the international gatekeeper training programs has been developed to be used consistently with each of the special conditions for the countries. It has been concluded that most international gatekeeper training programs may be inconsistent with the particular conditions of suicide in Korea. Second, it has been assumed that the early detection of suicide risk signals should be an essential content of “Suicide CARE” version 2.0. Thus, the “Careful observation” part has been proposed as the most important portion in the revision process of “Suicide CARE” from version 1.6 to 2.0. Third, since most of the international gatekeeper training programs require a range of tuition fees, it is speculated that the fees can contribute to the main obstacles for educating and training gatekeepers. Thus, it was concluded that “Suicide CARE” should be distributed free of charge. Fourth, role play and group simulation are regarded as the main sections in many of the international gatekeeper training programs. Thus, it has been proposed that role-play or group simulation should be included in “Suicide CARE” version 2.0.
Table 2.

International gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention

ProgramRequirementEducation
Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) [79]Instructor education: $2,600 for 5-day courseMini-lecture, discussion, group simulation, and role-play
Gatekeeper education: $36 for 14-hour course
Army ACE (Ask, Care, and Escort) [80]Gatekeeper education: peer-to-peer or buddy-to-buddy education for four hoursEncourage direct questions to peers with suicidal behavior
At-Risk for Middle School Educators [81]Gatekeeper education: online education for 50 minutes, $5–30Detect middle school students’ psychological conflicts including depressed mood and suicidal ideation
At-Risk for High School Educators [82]Gatekeeper education: $500–3,500 for 1-year licenseDetect high school students’ psychological conflicts
At-Risk for University and College Faculty [83]Gatekeeper education: online education for 45 minutes, $1,850–4,850 for 1-2-year licenseWeb-based interactive simulation to analyze virtual students’ psychological conflicts including depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation
At-Risk for University and College Students [84]Gatekeeper education: 30-minute course, $2–20 for usersOnline program to detect at-risk students, discuss his or her problems, and connect with a counseling center
At-Risk in the ED [85]Gatekeeper education: 1-hour course, $35–75 for usersOnline program to detect the signs of suicide and substance abuse in patients
Be A Link! [86]Instructor education: $295 for 2-day course Gatekeeper education: $375 for 2-hour course (including instructor resource)Community connection and risk protocol to detect risk factor and a warning sign of suicide
Campus Connect [87]Instructor education: $4,500 for 6-hour workshop Gatekeeper education: 2.5-hour trainingInformation about risky and protective factors of suicide, role-play to train communication skills
Connect Suicide Prevention Intervention Training [88]Instructor education: $6,000 for 3-day course Gatekeeper education: $1,600 for 4 to 6-hour courseEducate communication and link, decrease stigma, restrict lethal tools
Connect Suicide Postvention Training [89]Instructor education: $6,000 for 3-day course Gatekeeper education: $1,600 for 4 to 6-hour courseIncrease collaboration to provide the most effective intervention, care for a survivor, and connect with community society
Connect Youth Leaders Partnering with Adults in Youth Suicide Prevention [90]Gatekeeper education: $6,000 for a 2-day courseAdolescent suicide prevention program
EndingSuicide.Com [78]Gatekeeper education: two modules on the homepageSimple module for persons who have no health education and a complex module for health professionals
Family of Heroes: Training for Family Members for Veterans [91]Gatekeeper education: 1-hour course, $2–2.5 for usersSimulation conversation with a virtual veteran
Gryphon Place Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Program-A Middle School Curriculum [92]Gatekeeper education: 3-day courseDetect, intervene, and help adolescents at-risk
High School Gatekeeper Curriculum [92]Gatekeeper education: four lessensDetect, intervene, and help adolescents at-risk
How Not to Keep a Secret (HNTKAS) [93]Gatekeeper education: $50 for a one-day course (including free DVD)Include clinical presentation, documentary, and interview skills
Just Talk About It: Suicide Prevention Toolkit [78]Instructor education: free for 2-hour course Gatekeeper education: 0.5 to 1.5-hour courseHelp adolescents with the signs of suicidal ideation
In Harm’s Way: Law Enforcement Suicide Prevention [94]Instructor education: free for 8-hour courseDetect warning signs of depression, PTSD, and suicide through peer training
Late Life Suicide Prevention Toolkit [95]Gatekeeper education: freeDetect suicide warning signs, establish a relationship, evaluate suicide risk and resilience factors
Let’s Talk Gatekeeper Training [78]Gatekeeper education: 2-hour courseUnderstand the risky and protective factors of suicide, warning signs of suicide, and communication with children and adolescents
Lifelines Intervention: Helping Students At Risk for Suicide [96]Gatekeeper education: $149 for manual (216 pages) and DVD (37 minutes)Modify classical counseling skills about the school environment
Life Savers Training [97]Gatekeeper education: $230 for 3-day courseActive listening, confidentiality, and help peers with a psychological problem
Making Educators Partners in Youth Suicide Prevention [98]Gatekeeper education: free for five modulesEmail specific questions to expert personnel
More Than Sad: Suicide Prevention Education for Teachers and Other School Personnel [99]Gatekeeper education: $99.99 for one guidebook and 2 DVDsEducate on the life-threatening mental disorders of adolescents
Online Counseling and Suicide Intervention Specialist (OCSIS) [100]Gatekeeper education: $199 for a volunteer, $399 for professionalDetect, evaluate, and relieve suicide risk
Operation S.A.V.E.: VA Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training [101]Gatekeeper education: free for 1 to 2- hour courseInclude risk factors of suicide, SAVE model
QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) [102]Gatekeeper education: $495 for 12-hour course, $395 for 8-hour course“Chain of survival” approach to recognize warning signs
QPR for Law Enforcement [102]Gatekeeper education: $119 for 90-minute courseOnline education program to recognize warning signs of suicide
QPR for Nurses [103]Gatekeeper education: $139 for 3 to 6-hour courseEvaluate suicidal risk
Response: A Comprehensive High School-based Suicide Awareness Program [104]Instructor education: $375 for 2-hour course of teacherDetect depression and suicidal ideation, and recommend services
Gatekeeper education: $150
Shield of Care: A System-Focused Approach to Protecting Juvenile Justice Youth from Suicide [105]Gatekeeper education: free for 8-hour courseSuicide prevention system-centered model to connect with adolescents
Sources of Strength [106]Instructor education: $5,000 for 40-hour courseSend a message of “Hope, Help, and Strength” through a presentation, poster, video, and the internet
Gatekeeper education: 15-hour course
Student Support Network [107]Instructor education: $1,000–3,000 for 1 to 2-day courseInclude mental and behavioral health problems and knowledge about the community
Gatekeeper education: free
Suicide Alertness for Everyone (safeTALK) [108]Instructor education: $820 for 2-day workshopA structured behavior training program with graded exposure
Gatekeeper education: $6.50–7.50
Student and Aging: A Gatekeeper’s Workshop [109]Gatekeeper education: 4-hour courseDetect the risk factors of suicide in the elderly
Suicide Prevention Training for Gatekeeper of Older Adult [110]Gatekeeper education: free for 8-hour courseInclude aging, mental health, and suicide, risk and protective factors of suicide
Trevor Lifeguard Workshop [111]Instructor education: 2-day courseTwo versions, LGBTQ adolescents and ordinary adolescents
Gatekeeper education: 1-hour course
Veterans on Campus [112]Gatekeeper education: $2,500Discuss psychological conflicts of veterans and connect with community resources
Working Minds: Suicide Prevention in the Workplace [113]Instructor education: $1,000 for 1-day courseEducate on interviewing skills about psychological conflicts of workers

Adapted from Suicide Prevention Resource Center. Resources and Programs [Internet]. Waltham, MA: Suicide Prevention Resource Center; 2020, according to the Creative commons license [81]

Psychological autopsy interview reports 2015–2018

The Korea Psychological Autopsy Center has published psychological autopsy interview reports, which present the clinical characteristics of 391 Korean suicide completers from 2015 to 2018, based on interviews with family survivors [12]. The contents for the psychological autopsy interview reports, 2015–2018, were also included in the revision of the “Suicide CARE.” Among 391 suicide completers, 92.3% (n=361) presented warning signals before suicide completion, whereas 6.1% (n=24) did not present warning signals. In addition, 1.5% (n=6) were not aware of the warning signals. In the 361 suicide completers who presented warning signs before death, alterations in verbal expression, behaviors, and emotions, 77.0% (n=278) were not recognized, whereas only 20.5% (n=74) were recognized. In addition, warning sign recognitions in 2.5% (n=9) was not evaluated. The psychological autopsy interview reports classified suicide warning signals into three groups: verbal, behavioral, and situational signals. First, the verbal and behavioral signals for a total of 249 people who committed suicide from 2016 to 2018, were analyzed descriptively since the data from the suicide completers in 2015 did not contain specific contents. The specific suicidal signals were as follows: the verbal signals were classified into frequent mentions about suicide, homicide, or death (n=130, 52.2%), somatic complaints (n=120, 48.2%), expression of self-criticism (n=106, 42.6%), questioning on how to commit suicide (n=30, 12.0%), writing about death in letters, notes, etc. (n=40, 16.1%), expression of longing for the afterlife (n=30, 12.0%), and talking about people who committed suicide (n=19, 7.6%). The behavioral signals were classified into alterations in sleep (n=164, 65.9%), alterations in appetite (n=133, 53.4%), decreased concentration or indecisiveness (n=82, 32.9%), indifference to appearance management (n=82, 32.9%), disposing of the belongings (n=75, 30.1%), self-destructive behaviors or substance abuse (n=63, 25.3%), striving to improve interpersonal relationships (n=45, 18.1%), planning suicide (n=43, 17.3%), aggressive or impulsive behaviors (n=43, 17.3%), giving others the things they usually valued (n=19, 7.6%), and excessive collecting of poems, music, and movies related to death (n=12, 4.8%). Second, the situational signals for a total of 103 people who completed suicides in 2018 only were analyzed descriptively. Since situational signals for suicide can be multifactorial and complex, they were simply classified as mental health problems (n=87, 84.5%), occupation-related stress (n=70, 68.0%), economic problems (n=56, 54.4%), family-related stress (n=56, 54.4%), interpersonal relationship-related stress (n=40, 38.8%), spouse-related stress (n=35, 34.0%), physical health problems (n=34, 33.0%), lover-related stress (n=14, 13.6%), and learning-related stress (n=14, 13.6%). In terms of classification of the suicide commitment period, the warning signals three months before the suicide completion were alterations in emotion, alterations in appetite, alterations in sleep, disposing of the belongings, and loss of energy or interest. In addition, the warning signals one week before suicide completion were disposing of belongings, striving to improve interpersonal relationships, and aggressive or impulsive behaviors. Furthermore, in terms of classification of the life cycle, the suicide warning signals of young adults were learning, family and lover-related stress, loneliness, and absence of close relationships. In addition, the signals in middle-aged adults were economic stress and debt problems. Finally, the signals in the elderly were chronic physical diseases, unspecified somatic symptoms, and absence of interpersonal relationships. As shown in Figure 2, based on the psychological autopsy interview reports, the chronicled pathways to suicide completion of job seekers, self-employed persons, and retirees were conceptualized to improve the understanding of suicidal cases. Thus, by consensus of the developers for “Suicide CARE” version 2.0, life cycle-based example cases were selected from the conceptualized paths to suicide.
Figure 2.

Pathways to suicide completion. These pathways were proposed following the psychological autopsy interview reports collected between 2015 and 2018.

Feedback of persons who completed “Suicide CARE” version 1.6

From September 16 to October 4, 2019, a survey questionnaire that included difficulties in teaching, feedback about content and construction of each part, and feedback about instructor training courses was administered by persons who completed training of “Suicide CARE” version 1.6, and 66 persons responded to the survey questionnaire [82]. The responses were as follows: First, since many of the students for “Suicide CARE” version 1.6 felt bored, it has been proposed that a method to relieve boredom should be added in the new version. Thus, “Suicide CARE” version 2.0 is needed to fulfill a diversified demand for education according to age, sex, occupation, and other factors. In addition, the transcript of the lecture needs to be reduced, and the capability of educators needs to be increased in order to guarantee educators’ unconstrained lectures. Furthermore, the education time needs to be reduced to decrease the burden of educators and students. It has been proposed that weighting more important content can improve the efficiency of lectures. Second, it has been proposed that the contents of the adolescent version should be updated and added. Most of all, it is necessary to add the fact that suicide currently is the most common cause of death in adolescence. It is also necessary to add the fact that self-injury is a warning sign for suicide. Moreover, it is necessary to complement a method to improve the concentration of middle school students. Third, it has been proposed that “Suicide CARE” version 2.0, including the transcript of a lecture, should be differentiated according to the life cycle or occupation (i.e., adolescents, elders, office workers, public servants, soldiers, teachers, college students, etc.). It has been proposed that an advanced course should be developed in “Suicide CARE” version 2.0. In addition, it is necessary to diversify the scenarios of role-playing to improve the quality of the practical exercise for educators. Overall, the contents of the survey responses were consistent with the opinions of the developers for “Suicide CARE” version 2.0.

DISCUSSION

The developers of “Suicide CARE” version 2.0 planned to revise more than 70% of “Suicide CARE” version 1.6 based on the troubling suicide-related situation in Korea. Psychological autopsy interview reports showed that suicide completers express self-deprecation and show changes in sleep and appetite. Thus, the findings of the psychological autopsy interview reports were planned to be incorporated into video clip scenarios. It has also been planned that the characters of video clips include a job-seeker (aged 20–30, female), a self-employed person (middle aged, male), and a retired person (over 70 years old, male). Herein, from August 2019 to February 2020, the workbook, manuscript of lecture, and video clips of “Suicide CARE” were revised. Since “Suicide CARE” version 2.0 was developed based on extensive international literature reviews and the psychological characteristics of more than 300,000 Koreans, it is expected to enhance the effectiveness of gatekeeper training. In “Suicide CARE” version 2.0, educational video clips are regarded as an important component because it is a key medium that delivers the main contents of education to the trainee. Herein, as shown in Table 3, “Suicide CARE” has been updated from version 1.6 to 2.0 [114]. In terms of a utilization plan, from now on it is expected that all gatekeeper education programs be conducted using “Suicide CARE” version 2.0. Moreover, it is expected that “Suicide CARE” version 2.0 be positioned as the basic framework for many developing gatekeeper training programs for suicide prevention in Korea in the near future. However, owing to the limited production cost, there has been a limit on capturing visual quality that can convey empathy and emotion along with educational content. In the future, when revising “Suicide CARE” version 2.0 or when creating a specialized program for other special roles, such as firefighters and soldiers, it is necessary to reflect sufficient production costs in the production of the video when forecasting a budget.
Table 3.

Comparison of “Suicide CARE” versions 1.6 and 2.0

Version 1.6Version 2.0
Introduction• Introduce suicide epidemiological data• Quote the psychological autopsy interview reports (2015–2018)
• Emphasize the importance of the gatekeeper training program
• Quote written texts authored by Prof. Se-Won Lim
“Careful observation”• Introduce theoretically relevant verbal, behavioral, and situational warning signs of suicide completers• Introduce the real verbal, behavioral, and situational warning signs of suicide completers, based on the psychological autopsy interview reports (2015–2018)
• Explain the characteristics of the warning signs according to life cycles
“Active listening”• Ask a question about suicidal ideation• Connect the warning signs of “Care observation” with the question of “Active listening”
• Explain the concept of ambivalence• Change the explaining pattern and design about the concept of ambivalence
“Risk evaluation and Expert referral”• Lists for safety check• Dichotomize the lists for safety into the evaluation of suicide risk and helping safely
• Change video clips and role play
  5 in total

1.  An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools.

Authors:  Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Mark LoMurray; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Mariya Petrova; Qin Yu; Erin Walsh; Xin Tu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Using Virtual Patient Simulations to Prepare Primary Health Care Professionals to Conduct Substance Use and Mental Health Screening and Brief Intervention.

Authors:  Glenn Albright; Craig Bryan; Cyrille Adam; Jeremiah McMillan; Kristen Shockley
Journal:  J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.385

3.  Insights in Public Health: Safe Messaging for Youth-Led Suicide Prevention Awareness: Examples from Hawai'i.

Authors:  Jane J Chung-Do; Deborah A Goebert; Kris Bifulco; Jeanelle Sugimoto-Matsuda; JoAnne Balberde-Kamali'i; Dane Ka'ae; Leslie Lau Hee; Larry Walter
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2016-05

4.  Using an Avatar-Based Simulation to Train Families to Motivate Veterans with Post-Deployment Stress to Seek Help at the VA.

Authors:  Glenn Albright; Ron Goldman; Kristen M Shockley; Fiona McDevitt; Sam Akabas
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2011-10-11

Review 5.  Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review.

Authors:  Gil Zalsman; Keith Hawton; Danuta Wasserman; Kees van Heeringen; Ella Arensman; Marco Sarchiapone; Vladimir Carli; Cyril Höschl; Ran Barzilay; Judit Balazs; György Purebl; Jean Pierre Kahn; Pilar Alejandra Sáiz; Cendrine Bursztein Lipsicas; Julio Bobes; Doina Cozman; Ulrich Hegerl; Joseph Zohar
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 27.083

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Serious Suicide Attempts: Difference Between Older and Younger Attempters in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Seo Eun Cho; Jae Myeong Kang; Soo Kyun Woo; Seung-Gul Kang; Byeong Kil Yeon; Seong-Jin Cho
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Understanding Somatic Symptoms Associated with South Korean Adolescent Suicidal Ideation, Depression, and Social Anxiety.

Authors:  Hayoung Kim Donnelly; Danielle Richardson; Scott V Solberg
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Changing Seasonal Pattern of Suicides in Korea Between 2000 and 2019.

Authors:  Hee Jung Nam; Hyun-Bo Sim; Ju-Yeon Lee; Sung-Wan Kim; Jae-Min Kim; Seunghyong Ryu
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.202

4.  Development of a Checklist for Predicting Suicidality Based on Risk and Protective Factors: The Gwangju Checklist for Evaluation of Suicidality.

Authors:  Sung-Wan Kim; Woo-Young Park; Honey Kim; Min Jhon; Ju-Wan Kim; Hee-Ju Kang; Seon-Young Kim; Seunghyoung Ryu; Ju-Yeon Lee; Il-Seon Shin; Jae-Min Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.202

5.  Trends in suicide deaths before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea.

Authors:  Seunghyong Ryu; Hee Jung Nam; Min Jhon; Ju-Yeon Lee; Jae-Min Kim; Sung-Wan Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Contents of the Standardized Suicide Prevention Program for Gatekeeper Intervention in Korea, Version 2.0.

Authors:  Kyoung-Sae Na; Seon-Cheol Park; Sun-Jung Kwon; Minjae Kim; Hyoung-Jun Kim; Myungjae Baik; Jinmi Seol; Eun Ji An; Sang Min Lee; Eun-Jin Lee; Meerae Lim; Sung Joon Cho; Gwang Hun Kim; Nari Kim; Hong Jin Jeon; Jong-Woo Paik; Kang Seob Oh; Hwa-Young Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Socioeconomic factors associated with suicidal behaviors in South Korea: systematic review on the current state of evidence.

Authors:  Nicolas Raschke; Amir Mohsenpour; Leona Aschentrup; Florian Fischer; Kamil J Wrona
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.