Literature DB >> 16539090

The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.

Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer1.   

Abstract

The Continual Reassessment Method (CRM), along with other adaptive dose-finding study designs, has gained popularity since its proposal by O'Quigley. Several of the reasons it has been embraced by clinical trialists is that it tends to incur fewer toxic events, and more accurately estimate the maximum tolerated dose as compared to the standard Phase I dose escalation designs. Many variations have been published and discussed in the statistical literature, but there has not been as much practical advice for choosing design parameters and implementing the CRM. As a result, the CRM has not been as widely utilized as it could be for dose-finding studies. The goal of this paper is to provide a tutorial for those unfamiliar with the CRM who are either statisticians considering using the CRM for the first time, or investigators with some statistical background. This paper presents the original CRM, and then some of its modified versions. It also explains the specifications that define a CRM design, along with simulated examples of CRMs and standard designs, for illustration.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16539090     DOI: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  51 in total

Review 1.  Designing clinical trials for dystonia.

Authors:  Wendy R Galpern; Christopher S Coffey; Alberto Albanese; Ken Cheung; Cynthia L Comella; Dixie J Ecklund; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Karl Kieburtz; Anthony E Lang; Michael P McDermott; Jeremy M Shefner; Jan K Teller; John L P Thompson; Sharon D Yeatts; H A Jinnah
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Statistical Methods for Selecting Maximum Effective Dose and Evaluating Treatment Effect When Dose - Response is Monotonic.

Authors:  Maiying Kong; Shesh N Rai; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 1.452

Review 3.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Scientific Review of Phase I Protocols With Novel Dose-Escalation Designs: How Much Information Is Needed?

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Mithat Gönen; George J Bosl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The superiority of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to the rolling six design in pediatric oncology Phase I trials.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Julia Lee; Rajen Mody; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Estimating the dose-toxicity curve in completed phase I studies.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Irina Ostrovnaya
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system.

Authors:  James D Guest; John D Steeves; M J Mulcahey; Linda A T Jones; Frank Rockhold; Rϋediger Rupp; John L K Kramer; Steven Kirshblum; Andrew Blight; Daniel Lammertse
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives from a National Institutes of Health-funded workshop.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Bruce Levin; Christina Clark; Cate Timmerman; Janet Wittes; Peter Gilbert; Sara Harris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.