Literature DB >> 12933550

Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Y Lin1, W J Shih.   

Abstract

Although there are several new designs for phase I cancer clinical trials including the continual reassessment method and accelerated titration design, the traditional algorithm-based designs, like the '3 + 3' design, are still widely used because of their practical simplicity. In this paper, we study some key statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs in a general framework and derive the exact formulae for the corresponding statistical quantities. These quantities are important for the investigator to gain insights regarding the design of the trial, and are (i) the probability of a dose being chosen as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); (ii) the expected number of patients treated at each dose level; (iii) target toxicity level (i.e. the expected dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) incidences at the MTD); (iv) expected DLT incidences at each dose level and (v) expected overall DLT incidences in the trial. Real examples of clinical trials are given, and a computer program to do the calculation can be found at the authors' website approximately linyo" locator-type="url">http://www2.umdnj.edu/ approximately linyo.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12933550     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.2.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  43 in total

1.  A Phase I Study of Light Dose for Photodynamic Therapy Using 2-[1-Hexyloxyethyl]-2 Devinyl Pyropheophorbide-a for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Carcinoma In Situ or Non-Small Cell Microinvasive Bronchogenic Carcinoma: A Dose Ranging Study.

Authors:  Samjot Singh Dhillon; Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri; Gregory Loewen; Chukwumere Nwogu; Michele Cooper; Barbara W Henderson
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Targeted cytolysins synergistically potentiate cytoplasmic delivery of gelonin immunotoxin.

Authors:  Christopher M Pirie; David V Liu; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Quality assessment of phase I dose-finding cancer trials: proposal of a checklist.

Authors:  Sarah Zohar; Qing Lian; Vincent Levy; Ken Cheung; Anastasia Ivanova; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Stochastic approximation with virtual observations for dose-finding on discrete levels.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Sue-Jane Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Kenneth R Hess; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  The superiority of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to the rolling six design in pediatric oncology Phase I trials.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Julia Lee; Rajen Mody; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Combined autophagy and HDAC inhibition: a phase I safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analysis of hydroxychloroquine in combination with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Devalingam Mahalingam; Monica Mita; John Sarantopoulos; Leslie Wood; Ravi K Amaravadi; Lisa E Davis; Alain C Mita; Tyler J Curiel; Claudia M Espitia; Steffan T Nawrocki; Francis J Giles; Jennifer S Carew
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 16.016

10.  Continual reassessment method vs. traditional empirically based design: modifications motivated by Phase I trials in pediatric oncology by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Arzu Onar; Mehmet Kocak; James M Boyett
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.