| Literature DB >> 32922927 |
Yucheng Lu1, Baotao Lv2, Qimin Song3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischaemia animal models were established by selective ligation of the lumbar artery in a craniocaudal direction between the renal artery and the aortic bifurcation. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials were measured to enable their use in future studies on spinal cord ischaemia protection.Entities:
Keywords: Amplitude; Motor-evoked potential; Rabbits; Spinal cord ischaemic injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 32922927 PMCID: PMC7398191 DOI: 10.1186/s41016-019-0174-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Neurosurg J ISSN: 2057-4967
Fig. 1The amplitude and latency of Tes-MEPs were stable at different times after anaesthesia in the different groups. a Typical wave of transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials. b Sham group. c Group 1. d Group 2. e Group 3. f Group 4. g Group 5. Tes-MEP latency is defined as the duration, in millisecond, from stimulation to the first progressive negative deflection. Tes-MEP amplitude is defined as peak-to-peak amplitude in microvolts (N1–P1). The red graphics indicate the positive and negative baseline waveform before ligation. The green graphics indicate the positive and negative baseline waveform after lumbar artery ligation
The amplitude and latency of Tes-MEPs at different times after anaesthesia in the control group (mean ± standard deviation)
| Time (min) | LAT (ms)* | AMP (μV)* |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 12.42 ± 1.26 | 5147.88 ± 2240.59 |
| 60 | 12.54 ± 1.24 | 5045.13 ± 2198.68 |
| 90 | 12.43 ± 1.20 | 5107.75 ± 2176.90 |
| 120 | 12.43 ± 1.20 | 5054.88 ± 2151.21 |
| 150 | 12.43 ± 1.15 | 5024.13 ± 2041.39 |
| 180 | 12.42 ± 1.16 | 5110.88 ± 2190.23 |
Analysis of variance
*P > 0.05
The latency of Tes-MEPs at different times before and after surgery (mean ± standard deviation)
| Group | Before ligation | 30 min after ligation | 2 days after ligation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham group ( | 12.45 ± 1.17 | 12.45 ± 1.15 | 12.45 ± 1.17 |
| Group 1 ( | 11.20 ± 1.06 | 11.20 ± 1.06★ | 11.20 ± 1.06★ |
| Group 2 ( | 12.18 ± 0.52 | 12.16 ± 0.50★ | 12.18 ± 0.51★ |
| Group 3 ( | 12.92 ± 1.26 | 12.90 ± 1.27★ | 12.93 ± 1.26★ |
| Group 4 ( | 12.18 ± 0.61 | 13.28 ± 1.33★ | 12.30 ± 0.71★ |
| Group 5 ( | 12.48 ± 0.23 |
t test before ligation
★P > 0.05
The amplitude of Tes-MEPs at different times before and after surgery (mean ± standard deviation)
| Time | Before ligation | 30 min after ligation | 2 days after ligation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham group ( | 5267.50 ± 2264.04 | 4673.87 ± 1954.02 | 4926.38 ± 1964.48 |
| Group 1 ( | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 92.82 ± 5.60★ | 97.61 ± 2.07★ |
| Group 2 ( | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 92.82 ± 4.10★ | 98.09 ± 5.57★ |
| Group 3 ( | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 61.39 ± 2.12△ | 97.95 ± 1.65★ |
| Group 4 ( | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 21.63 ± 2.40△ | 40.38 ± 6.90△ |
| Group 5 ( | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 1.09 ± 2.44△ | 2.15 ± 4.82△ |
t test before ligation
★P > 0.05
△P < 0.01
Functional evaluations before and after surgery (mean ± standard deviation)
| Time | Before ligation | Anaesthesia awake | 2 days after ligation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham group ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00★ | 5.00 ± 0.00★ |
| Group 1 ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00★ | 5.00 ± 0.00★ |
| Group 2 ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00★ | 5.00 ± 0.00★ |
| Group 3 ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 3.75 ± 0.50△ | 5.00 ± 0.00★ |
| Group 4 ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 1.75 ± 0.96△ | 2.50 ± 0.58△ |
| Group 5 ( | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00△ | 0.20 ± 0.45△ |
t test before ligation
★P > 0.05
△P < 0.05
Fig. 2HE (haematoxylin-eosin) staining of spinal cord sections at the 2 days after operation. a No sign of neurnal damage was observed in the sham group. b Decrease of the cell volume of neuron and karyopyknosis were observed in group 3. c Reduction of the number of neuron and vacuolation of grey matter were observed in Group 4. d Apoptotic and necrotic motoneurons in the ventral horn were observed in group 5