Literature DB >> 24055297

Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

D B Macdonald1, S Skinner, J Shils, C Yingling.   

Abstract

The following intraoperative MEP recommendations can be made on the basis of current evidence and expert opinion: (1) Acquisition and interpretation should be done by qualified personnel. (2) The methods are sufficiently safe using appropriate precautions. (3) MEPs are an established practice option for cortical and subcortical mapping and for monitoring during surgeries risking motor injury in the brain, brainstem, spinal cord or facial nerve. (4) Intravenous anesthesia usually consisting of propofol and opioid is optimal for muscle MEPs. (5) Interpretation should consider limitations and confounding factors. (6) D-wave warning criteria consider amplitude reduction having no confounding factor explanation: >50% for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, and >30-40% for peri-Rolandic surgery. (7) Muscle MEP warning criteria are tailored to the type of surgery and based on deterioration clearly exceeding variability with no confounding factor explanation. Disappearance is always a major criterion. Marked amplitude reduction, acute threshold elevation or morphology simplification could be additional minor or moderate spinal cord monitoring criteria depending on the type of surgery and the program's technique and experience. Major criteria for supratentorial, brainstem or facial nerve monitoring include >50% amplitude reduction when warranted by sufficient preceding response stability. Future advances could modify these recommendations.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D-wave; Intraoperative monitoring; Motor evoked potentials; Muscle MEPs

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055297     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  68 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  [Neuroanesthesia].

Authors:  K Engelhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Localization of the primary sites of involvement in the spinal sensory and motor pathways for multilevel MRI abnormalities in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Nobuaki Tadokoro; Toshikazu Tani; Kazunobu Kida; Katsuhito Kiyasu; Yusuke Kasai; Masashi Kumon; Ryuichi Takemasa; Masahiko Ikeuchi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Is intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring valuable predicting postoperative neurological recovery?

Authors:  Y J Rho; S C Rhim; J K Kang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Transcranial motor-evoked potentials of laryngeal muscles for intraoperative neuromonitoring of the vagus nerve during thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Ichino; Satoshi Tanaka; Ryusuke Tanaka; Naruaki Tanaka; Takashi Ishida; Yuki Sugiyama; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Multimodal nerve monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy identifies surgical steps associated with risk of injury.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Travis Heare; Lauryn Kestel; Patricia Oliver; Willy Boucharel; Jason Koerner; Kim Strupp
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring outcomes between cervical and thoracic spine surgery.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Yuan Tian; Xiangquan Lin; Zhifu Ren; Yu Zhao; Jiliang Zhai; Xiaojuan Zhang; Yanwei Zhao; Yingyue Dong; Congran Zhao; Ye Tian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgical results of tumor resection using tractography-integrated navigation-guided fence-post catheter techniques and motor-evoked potentials for preservation of motor function in patients with glioblastomas near the pyramidal tracts.

Authors:  Shiro Ohue; Shohei Kohno; Akihiro Inoue; Daisuke Yamashita; Shirabe Matsumoto; Satoshi Suehiro; Yoshiaki Kumon; Keiichi Kikuchi; Takanori Ohnishi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Incidence of peripheral nerve injury during shoulder arthroplasty when motor evoked potentials are monitored.

Authors:  Alexander W Aleem; W Bryan Wilent; Alexa C Narzikul; Andrew F Kuntz; Edward S Chang; Gerald R Williams; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.