| Literature DB >> 29285072 |
Mingguang Wang1, Fanguo Meng1, Qimin Song1, Jian Zhang1, Chao Dai1, Qingyan Zhao1.
Abstract
The present study examined changes in the transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (TceMEP) waveform to predict neurological deficits and histopathological changes during the early and reversible stage of different levels of permanent spinal cord ischemic injury in a rabbit animal model. A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into four groups of 6 rabbits each. Group 1 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at three levels (L1-L3), group 2 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at four levels (L1-L4) and group 3 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at five levels (L1-L5). The sham group contained 6 rabbits and did not receive ligation. TceMEP was recorded within 5 min of ligation and, 2 days later, motor function was assessed and the spinal cords were removed for histological examination. Following spinal cord injury, the relationship between variations in the TceMEP waveform and motor function and pathological damage was analyzed. It was observed that the amplitude of TceMEP began to decrease within 1 min of lumbar artery ligation and that the amplitude stabilized within 5 min. These amplitude changes that occurred within 5 min of different levels of permanent spinal cord ischemic injury were positively related to changes in motor function following recovery from anesthesia and 2 days after ligation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.980 and 0.923 for these two time points, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, the amplitude changes were positively related to pathological damage, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.945 (P<0.001). The results of the present study suggested that amplitude changes in TceMEP are particularly sensitive to ischemia. Ischemia may be detected within 1 min and the amplitude changes begin to stabilize within 5 min following ligation of the lumbar artery. The use of intraoperative monitoring of TceMEP allows for the detection of spinal cord ischemic injury with no time delay, which may allow for protective measures to be taken to prevent the occurrence of irreversible spinal cord injury.Entities:
Keywords: evoked potentials; intraoperative; monitoring; motor; rabbits; spinal cord ischemic injuries
Year: 2017 PMID: 29285072 PMCID: PMC5740705 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
The amplitude and latency of TceMEP at different times after anesthesia (mean ± standard deviation).
| TceMEP parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Time after anesthesia, min | Latency, msec[ | Amplitude, µV[ |
| 30 | 13.03±1.12 | 5312.67±1801.85 |
| 60 | 13.12±1.15 | 5185.33±1691.75 |
| 90 | 13.00±1.15 | 5202.67±1680.04 |
| 120 | 13.02±1.10 | 5180.00±1687.67 |
| 150 | 12.98±1.09 | 5125.00±1701.80 |
| 180 | 12.97±1.12 | 5086.17±1490.85 |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance, but no significant differences in
latency
amplitude were observed between time points. TceMEP, transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential.
The amplitude and latency of TceMEP at different times before and after surgery.
| TceMEP parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Time | Latency, msec[ | Amplitude, µV[ |
| Preoperative | 13.02±1.10 | 5300.00±1816.84 |
| 30 min after surgery | 13.03±1.07 | 5213.67±1679.67 |
| 1 day after surgery | 13.03±1.11 | 5013.17±1587.49 |
Results were analyzed using analysis of variance, but no significant differences in
latency (P>0.05)
amplitude (P>0.05) were observed between different time points before and after surgery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. TceMEP, transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential.
Figure 1.The typical wave of TceMEP. TceMEP latency refers to the duration in msec from stimulation to the first progressive negative deflection. TceMEP amplitude refers to the peak-to-peak amplitude in microvolts (N1-P1). The red graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform before ligation. The green graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform after lumbar arteries were ligated. TceMEP, transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials.
Figure 2.The waveform of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials before and after three levels of lumbar arteries were ligated. The red graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform before lumbar artery ligation. The green graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform after the lumbar arteries were ligated.
Figure 4.The waveform of transcranial electrical MEP before and after five levels of lumbar arteries were ligated. The red graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform before lumbar artery ligation. The green graphics reflect the positive and negative baseline waveform after lumbar arteries were ligated. MEP, motor-evoked potential.
Figure 5.Hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of spinal cord in the control group. Intact motor neurons in the ventral horn were observed. Magnification, ×200.
Figure 6.Hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of spinal cord in the 4-level ligation group. Apoptotic and necrotic motor neurons in the most ventral horn were observed. Magnification, ×200.
Figure 7.Hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of spinal cord in the 5-level ligation group. Apoptotic and necrotic motor neurons were observed in all ventral horns were observed. Magnification, ×200.