Literature DB >> 27797292

People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat.

Tom Nissens1,2, Michel Failing1, Jan Theeuwes1.   

Abstract

It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Threat; eye movements; oculomotor capture; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27797292     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  25 in total

1.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  The influence of emotional stimuli on the oculomotor system: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Manon Mulckhuyse
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Dissociable Components of Experience-Driven Attention.

Authors:  Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The influence of threat and aversive motivation on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Mark K Britton
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

7.  Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Andy Jeesu Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

8.  Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.

Authors:  Yanliang Sun; Luzi Xu; Xinyu Luo; Yanju Ren; Xiaowei Ding
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

10.  The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.

Authors:  David S Lee; Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.