Literature DB >> 32896301

10-day decitabine with venetoclax for newly diagnosed intensive chemotherapy ineligible, and relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 trial.

Courtney D DiNardo1, Abhishek Maiti2, Caitlin R Rausch3, Naveen Pemmaraju1, Kiran Naqvi1, Naval G Daver1, Tapan M Kadia1, Gautam Borthakur1, Maro Ohanian1, Yesid Alvarado1, Ghayas C Issa1, Guillermo Montalban-Bravo1, Nicholas J Short1, Musa Yilmaz1, Prithviraj Bose1, Elias J Jabbour1, Koichi Takahashi1, Jan A Burger1, Guillermo Garcia-Manero1, Nitin Jain1, Steven M Kornblau1, Philip A Thompson1, Zeev Estrov1, Lucia Masarova1, Koji Sasaki1, Srdan Verstovsek1, Alessandra Ferrajoli1, William G Weirda1, Sa A Wang4, Sergej Konoplev4, Zhining Chen4, Sherry A Pierce1, Jing Ning5, Wei Qiao5, Farhad Ravandi1, Michael Andreeff1, John S Welch6, Hagop M Kantarjian1, Marina Y Konopleva7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents is a new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are 75 years or older, or unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic studies have suggested superiority of the longer 10-day regimen of decitabine that has shown promising results in patients with high-risk AML in phase 2 trials. We hypothesised that venetoclax with 10-day decitabine could have improved activity in patients with newly diagnosed AML and those with relapsed or refractory AML, particularly in high-risk subgroups.
METHODS: This single centre, phase 2 trial was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). The study enrolled older patients (aged >60 years) with newly diagnosed AML, not eligible for intensive chemotherapy; secondary AML (progressed after myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia); and relapsed or refractory AML. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 or less, white blood cell count less than 10 × 109 per L, and adequate end-organ function. Patients with favourable-risk cytogenetics (eg, t[15;17] or core-binding factor AML) or who had received previous BCL2-inhibitor therapy were excluded. Patients received decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously for 10 days with oral venetoclax 400 mg daily for induction, followed by decitabine for 5 days with daily venetoclax for consolidation. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. The secondary endpoints analysed within this report include safety, overall survival, and duration of response, in keeping with recommendations of European LeukemiaNet 2017 guidelines. All patients who received at least one dose of treatment were eligible for safety and response assessments. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03404193) and continues to accrue patients.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 19, 2018, and Dec 16, 2019, we enrolled 168 patients; 70 (42%) had newly diagnosed AML, 15 (9%) had untreated secondary AML, 28 (17%) had treated secondary AML, and 55 (33%) had relapsed or refractory AML. The median age was 71 years (IQR 65-76) and 30% of patients had ECOG performance status of 2 or higher. The median follow-up for all patients was 16 months (95% CI 12-18; actual follow-up 6·5 months; IQR 3·4-12·4). The overall response rate was 74% (125 of 168 patients; 95% CI 67-80) and in disease subgroups were: 89% in newly diagnosed AML (62 of 70 patients; 79-94), 80% in untreated secondary AML (12 of 15 patients; 55-93), 61% in treated secondary AML (17 of 28 patients; 42-76), and 62% in relapsed or refractory AML (34 of 55 patients; 49-74). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included infections with grades 3 or 4 neutropenia (n=79, 47%) and febrile neutropenia (n=49, 29%). 139 (83%) of 168 patients had serious adverse events, most frequently neutropenic fever (n=63, 38%), followed by pneumonia (n=17, 10%) and sepsis (n=16, 10%). The 30-day mortality for all patients was 3·6% (n=6, 95% CI 1·7-7·8). The median overall survival was 18·1 months (95% CI 10·0-not reached) in newly diagnosed AML, 7·8 months (2·9-10·7) in untreated secondary AML, 6·0 months (3·4-13·7) in treated secondary AML, and 7·8 months (5·4-13·3) relapsed or refractory AML. The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI 9·0-not reached) in newly diagnosed AML, 5·1 months (95% CI 0·9-not reached) in untreated secondary AML, not reached (95% CI 2·5-not reached) in previously treated secondary AML, and 16·8 months (95% CI 6·6-not reached) in relapsed or refractory AML.
INTERPRETATION: Venetoclax with 10-day decitabine has a manageable safety profile and showed high activity in newly diagnosed AML and molecularly defined subsets of relapsed or refractory AML. Future larger and randomised studies are needed to clarify activity in high-risk subsets. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32896301      PMCID: PMC7549397          DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30210-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  29 in total

Review 1.  The Bcl-2 apoptotic switch in cancer development and therapy.

Authors:  J M Adams; S Cory
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring.

Authors:  Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Neelima G Reddy; Varan Haghshenas; Mark J Routbort; Michael A Harmon; Bedia A Barkoh; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rajesh R Singh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Harmonization of light scatter and fluorescence flow cytometry profiles obtained after staining peripheral blood leucocytes for cell surface-only versus intracellular antigens with the Fix & Perm reagent.

Authors:  Elaine Sobral da Costa; Rodrigo Tosta Peres; Julia Almeida; Quentin Lécrevisse; María Elena Arroyo; Cristina Teodósio; Carlos Eduardo Pedreira; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.058

4.  Decitabine in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ellen K Ritchie; Eric J Feldman; Paul J Christos; Sarah D Rohan; Catherine B Lagassa; Cindy Ippoliti; Joseph M Scandura; Karen Carlson; Gail J Roboz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-02-07

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Amanda F Cashen; Gary J Schiller; Margaret R O'Donnell; John F DiPersio
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hagop M Kantarjian; Xavier G Thomas; Anna Dmoszynska; Agnieszka Wierzbowska; Grzegorz Mazur; Jiri Mayer; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Wen-Chien Chou; Rena Buckstein; Jaroslav Cermak; Ching-Yuan Kuo; Albert Oriol; Farhad Ravandi; Stefan Faderl; Jacques Delaunay; Daniel Lysák; Mark Minden; Christopher Arthur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Keith Pratz; Vinod Pullarkat; Brian A Jonas; Martha Arellano; Pamela S Becker; Olga Frankfurt; Marina Konopleva; Andrew H Wei; Hagop M Kantarjian; Tu Xu; Wan-Jen Hong; Brenda Chyla; Jalaja Potluri; Daniel A Pollyea; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Monocytic Subclones Confer Resistance to Venetoclax-Based Therapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Shanshan Pei; Daniel A Pollyea; Annika Gustafson; Brett M Stevens; Mohammad Minhajuddin; Rui Fu; Kent A Riemondy; Austin E Gillen; Ryan M Sheridan; Jihye Kim; James C Costello; Maria L Amaya; Anagha Inguva; Amanda Winters; Haobin Ye; Anna Krug; Courtney L Jones; Biniam Adane; Nabilah Khan; Jessica Ponder; Jeffrey Schowinsky; Diana Abbott; Andrew Hammes; Jason R Myers; John M Ashton; Travis Nemkov; Angelo D'Alessandro; Jonathan A Gutman; Haley E Ramsey; Michael R Savona; Clayton A Smith; Craig T Jordan
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Clinical experience with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax in combination therapy for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia and related myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Caitlin R Rausch; Christopher Benton; Tapan Kadia; Nitin Jain; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval Daver; Wendy Covert; Kayleigh R Marx; Morgan Mace; Elias Jabbour; Jorge Cortes; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Kapil N Bhalla; Hagop Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 13.265

View more
  57 in total

1.  Clinical and molecular predictors of response and survival following venetoclax therapy in relapsed/refractory AML.

Authors:  Maximilian Stahl; Kamal Menghrajani; Andriy Derkach; Alexander Chan; Wenbin Xiao; Jacob Glass; Amber C King; Anthony F Daniyan; Christopher Famulare; Bernadette M Cuello; Troy Z Horvat; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine; Aaron D Viny; Eytan M Stein; Sheng F Cai; Mikhail Roshal; Martin S Tallman; Aaron D Goldberg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 2.  Secondary AML Emerging After Therapy with Hypomethylating Agents: Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Steven D Green; Matthew C Foster; Joshua F Zeidner
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Single-center experience with venetoclax combinations in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed AML evolving from MPNs.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Courtney D DiNardo; Prithviraj Bose; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval G Daver; Tapan M Kadia; Helen T Chifotides; Lingsha Zhou; Gautam Borthakur; Zeev Estrov; Marina Konopleva; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-04-27

Review 4.  CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Preclinical Rationale, Current Clinical Progress, and Barriers to Success.

Authors:  Salvatore Fiorenza; Cameron J Turtle
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Li-Xia Zhu; Rong-Rong Chen; Lu-Lu Wang; Jia-Nai Sun; Li Li; Jie-Jing Qian; Yi Zhang; Hong-Yan Tong; Wen-Juan Yu; Hai-Tao Meng; Wen-Yuan Mai; Wan-Zhuo Xie; Jie Jin; Xiu-Jin Ye; Hong-Hu Zhu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Deserve Individualized Treatment.

Authors:  David C de Leeuw; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Jeroen J W M Janssen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Omar A Shahin; Helen T Chifotides; Prithviraj Bose; Lucia Masarova; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.195

8.  Prognostic value of measurable residual disease after venetoclax and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Courtney D DiNardo; Sa A Wang; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Tapan M Kadia; Naval G Daver; Nicholas J Short; Musa Yilmaz; Naveen Pemmaraju; Gautam Borthakur; Prithviraj Bose; Ghayas C Issa; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Elias J Jabbour; Nitin Jain; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Maro Ohanian; Koichi Takahashi; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Lucia Masarova; Jan A Burger; Philip A Thompson; Srdan Verstovsek; Koji Sasaki; Michael Andreeff; Caitlin R Rausch; Kathryn S Montalbano; Sherry Pierce; Wei Qiao; Jing Ning; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Y Konopleva; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-04-13

9.  Venetoclax with decitabine vs intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score matched analysis stratified by risk of treatment-related mortality.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Wei Qiao; Koji Sasaki; Farhad Ravandi; Tapan M Kadia; Elias J Jabbour; Naval G Daver; Gautam Borthakur; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sherry A Pierce; Kathryn S Montalbano; Naveen Pemmaraju; Kiran Naqvi; Maro Ohanian; Nicholas J Short; Yesid Alvarado; Koichi Takahashi; Musa Yilmaz; Nitin Jain; Steven M Kornblau; Michael Andreeff; Prithviraj Bose; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Ghayas C Issa; Lucia Masarova; Philip A Thompson; Caitlin R Rausch; Jing Ning; Hagop M Kantarjian; Courtney D DiNardo; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 10.047

10.  Ten-day decitabine with venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Courtney D DiNardo; Wei Qiao; Tapan M Kadia; Elias J Jabbour; Caitlin R Rausch; Naval G Daver; Nicholas J Short; Gautam Borthakur; Naveen Pemmaraju; Musa Yilmaz; Yesid Alvarado; Kathryn S Montalbano; Allison Wade; Rita E Maduike; Julio A Guerrero; Kenneth Vaughan; Carol A Bivins; Sherry Pierce; Jing Ning; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.