PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 485) age ≥ 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: The primary analysis with 396 deaths (81.6%) showed a nonsignificant increase in median OS with decitabine (7.7 months; 95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) versus TC (5.0 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 6.3; P = .108; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.04). An unplanned analysis with 446 deaths (92%) indicated the same median OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; nominal P = .037). The CR rate plus CRp was 17.8% with decitabine versus 7.8% with TC (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P = .001). AEs were similar for decitabine and cytarabine, although patients received a median of four cycles of decitabine versus two cycles of TC. The most common drug-related AEs with decitabine were thrombocytopenia (27%) and neutropenia (24%). CONCLUSION: In older patients with AML, decitabine improved response rates compared with standard therapies without major differences in safety. An unplanned survival analysis showed a benefit for decitabine, which was not observed at the time of the primary analysis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 485) age ≥ 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: The primary analysis with 396 deaths (81.6%) showed a nonsignificant increase in median OS with decitabine (7.7 months; 95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) versus TC (5.0 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 6.3; P = .108; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.04). An unplanned analysis with 446 deaths (92%) indicated the same median OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; nominal P = .037). The CR rate plus CRp was 17.8% with decitabine versus 7.8% with TC (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P = .001). AEs were similar for decitabine and cytarabine, although patients received a median of four cycles of decitabine versus two cycles of TC. The most common drug-related AEs with decitabine were thrombocytopenia (27%) and neutropenia (24%). CONCLUSION: In older patients with AML, decitabine improved response rates compared with standard therapies without major differences in safety. An unplanned survival analysis showed a benefit for decitabine, which was not observed at the time of the primary analysis.
Authors: R Willemze; S Suciu; E Archimbaud; P Muus; P Stryckmans; E A Louwagie; Z Berneman; M Tjean; P Wijermans; H Dohner; U Jehn; B Labar; B Jaksic; M Dardenne; R Zittoun Journal: Leukemia Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: William Blum; Ramiro Garzon; Rebecca B Klisovic; Sebastian Schwind; Alison Walker; Susan Geyer; Shujun Liu; Violaine Havelange; Heiko Becker; Larry Schaaf; Jon Mickle; Hollie Devine; Cheryl Kefauver; Steven M Devine; Kenneth K Chan; Nyla A Heerema; Clara D Bloomfield; Michael R Grever; John C Byrd; Miguel Villalona-Calero; Carlo M Croce; Guido Marcucci Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing; Guillermo Sanz; Alan F List; Steven Gore; John F Seymour; Hervé Dombret; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; C L Beach; Lewis R Silverman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Hartmut Döhner; Elihu H Estey; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Alan K Burnett; Hervé Dombret; Pierre Fenaux; David Grimwade; Richard A Larson; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel A Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A Baragaño Raneros; V Martín-Palanco; A F Fernandez; R M Rodriguez; M F Fraga; C Lopez-Larrea; B Suarez-Alvarez Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elizabeth A Griffiths; David P Steensma; Gail J Roboz; Richard Wells; James McCloskey; Olatoyosi Odenike; Amy E DeZern; Karen Yee; Lambert Busque; Casey O'Connell; Laura C Michaelis; Joseph Brandwein; Hagop Kantarjian; Aram Oganesian; Mohammad Azab; Michael R Savona Journal: Blood Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Chana L Glasser; Alice Lee; Don Eslin; Lianna Marks; Shakeel Modak; Julia L Glade Bender Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Minmin Liu; Hitoshi Ohtani; Wanding Zhou; Andreas Due Ørskov; Jessica Charlet; Yang W Zhang; Hui Shen; Stephen B Baylin; Gangning Liang; Kirsten Grønbæk; Peter A Jones Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 11.205