Daniel R Richardson1, Steven D Green2, Matthew C Foster1, Joshua F Zeidner3. 1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Houpt Building, Chapel Hill, NC, #7305, USA. 2. Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Houpt Building, Chapel Hill, NC, #7305, USA. Joshua_Zeidner@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Secondary AML (s-AML) encompasses a distinct subgroup of AML with either therapy-related AML or AML arising from preexisting myeloid neoplasms. Despite recent advances in the treatment armamentarium of AML, outcomes remain poor in s-AML. The purpose of this review is to highlight distinct characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment options for patients with s-AML. Further, we focus on a distinctly poor-risk subgroup of s-AML with previous exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and describe ongoing clinical trials in this patient population. RECENT FINDINGS: CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) is the first drug approved for s-AML and represents an advancement in the management of fit patients with this subtype of AML. Despite incremental improvement in remission rates and survival, long-term survival remains poor. Patients who have received prior HMAs for antecedent MDS rarely benefit from CPX-351 or other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The approval of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine has led to a paradigm shift in the management of newly diagnosed older unfit AML patients; however, patients with s-AML and prior HMA therapy were excluded from the landmark randomized phase 3 study. Several early phase clinical trials with both low- and high-intensity therapies are ongoing for s-AML patients, though prior HMA exposure limits inclusion in many of these studies that include HMAs. Patients with s-AML previously treated with an HMA have dismal outcomes with standard therapeutic options and are under-represented in clinical trials. Trials investigating novel therapeutic options in this population are critically needed.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Secondary AML (s-AML) encompasses a distinct subgroup of AML with either therapy-related AML or AML arising from preexisting myeloid neoplasms. Despite recent advances in the treatment armamentarium of AML, outcomes remain poor in s-AML. The purpose of this review is to highlight distinct characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment options for patients with s-AML. Further, we focus on a distinctly poor-risk subgroup of s-AML with previous exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and describe ongoing clinical trials in this patient population. RECENT FINDINGS: CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) is the first drug approved for s-AML and represents an advancement in the management of fit patients with this subtype of AML. Despite incremental improvement in remission rates and survival, long-term survival remains poor. Patients who have received prior HMAs for antecedent MDS rarely benefit from CPX-351 or other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The approval of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine has led to a paradigm shift in the management of newly diagnosed older unfit AMLpatients; however, patients with s-AML and prior HMA therapy were excluded from the landmark randomized phase 3 study. Several early phase clinical trials with both low- and high-intensity therapies are ongoing for s-AMLpatients, though prior HMA exposure limits inclusion in many of these studies that include HMAs. Patients with s-AML previously treated with an HMA have dismal outcomes with standard therapeutic options and are under-represented in clinical trials. Trials investigating novel therapeutic options in this population are critically needed.
Authors: Elli Papaemmanuil; Moritz Gerstung; Hartmut Döhner; Peter J Campbell; Lars Bullinger; Verena I Gaidzik; Peter Paschka; Nicola D Roberts; Nicola E Potter; Michael Heuser; Felicitas Thol; Niccolo Bolli; Gunes Gundem; Peter Van Loo; Inigo Martincorena; Peter Ganly; Laura Mudie; Stuart McLaren; Sarah O'Meara; Keiran Raine; David R Jones; Jon W Teague; Adam P Butler; Mel F Greaves; Arnold Ganser; Konstanze Döhner; Richard F Schlenk Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Prajwal Boddu; Hagop M Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Srdan Verstovsek; Elias Jabbour; Gautam Borthakur; Marina Konopleva; Kapil N Bhalla; Naval Daver; Courtney D DiNardo; Christopher B Benton; Koichi Takahashi; Zeev Estrov; Sherry R Pierce; Michael Andreeff; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan M Kadia Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: Richard M Stone; Emanuele Mazzola; Donna Neuberg; Steven L Allen; Arnaud Pigneux; Robert K Stuart; Meir Wetzler; David Rizzieri; Harry P Erba; Lloyd Damon; Jun-Ho Jang; Martin S Tallman; Krzysztof Warzocha; Tamás Masszi; Mikkael A Sekeres; Miklos Egyed; Heinz-August Horst; Dominik Selleslag; Scott R Solomon; Parameswaran Venugopal; Ante S Lundberg; Bayard Powell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Coleman Lindsley; Brenton G Mar; Emanuele Mazzola; Peter V Grauman; Sarah Shareef; Steven L Allen; Arnaud Pigneux; Meir Wetzler; Robert K Stuart; Harry P Erba; Lloyd E Damon; Bayard L Powell; Neal Lindeman; David P Steensma; Martha Wadleigh; Daniel J DeAngelo; Donna Neuberg; Richard M Stone; Benjamin L Ebert Journal: Blood Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Joshua F Zeidner; Matthew C Foster; Amanda L Blackford; Mark R Litzow; Lawrence E Morris; Stephen A Strickland; Jeffrey E Lancet; Prithviraj Bose; M Yair Levy; Raoul Tibes; Ivana Gojo; Christopher D Gocke; Gary L Rosner; Richard F Little; John J Wright; L Austin Doyle; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp Journal: Haematologica Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Gautam Borthakur; E Lin; Nitin Jain; Elihu E Estey; Jorge E Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Stefan Faderl; Farhad Ravandi; Sherry Pierce; Hagop Kantarjian Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman Journal: Blood Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: James A Kennedy; Eshetu G Atenafu; Hans A Messner; Kenneth J Craddock; Joseph M Brandwein; Jeffrey H Lipton; Mark D Minden; Aaron D Schimmer; Andre C Schuh; Karen W Yee; Vikas Gupta Journal: Blood Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 22.113