Literature DB >> 34343352

Ten-day decitabine with venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Abhishek Maiti1, Courtney D DiNardo1, Wei Qiao2, Tapan M Kadia1, Elias J Jabbour1, Caitlin R Rausch3, Naval G Daver1, Nicholas J Short1, Gautam Borthakur1, Naveen Pemmaraju1, Musa Yilmaz1, Yesid Alvarado1, Kathryn S Montalbano1, Allison Wade1, Rita E Maduike1, Julio A Guerrero1, Kenneth Vaughan1, Carol A Bivins1, Sherry Pierce1, Jing Ning2, Farhad Ravandi1, Hagop M Kantarjian1, Marina Y Konopleva1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has poor outcomes. Although lower-intensity venetoclax-containing regimens are standard for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, it is unknown how such regimens compare with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for R/R AML.
METHODS: Outcomes of R/R AML treated with 10-day decitabine and venetoclax (DEC10-VEN) were compared with IC-based regimens including idarubicin with cytarabine, with or without cladribine, clofarabine, or fludarabine, with or without additional agents. Propensity scores derived from patient baseline characteristics were used to match DEC10-VEN and IC patients to minimize bias.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients in the DEC10-VEN cohort were matched to 130 IC recipients. The median ages for the DEC10-VEN and IC groups were 64 and 58 years, respectively, and baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 cohorts. DEC10-VEN conferred significantly higher responses compared with IC including higher overall response rate (60% vs 36%; odds ratio [OR], 3.28; P < .001), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi, 19% vs 6%; OR, 3.56; P = .012), minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (28% vs 13%; OR, 2.48; P = .017), and lower rates of refractory disease. DEC10-VEN led to significantly longer median event-free survival compared with IC (5.7 vs 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70; P < .001), as well as median overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs 4.7 months; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.86; P = .008). DEC10-VEN was independently associated with improved OS compared with IC in multivariate analysis. Exploratory analysis for OS in 27 subgroups showed that DEC10-VEN was comparable with IC as salvage therapy for R/R AML.
CONCLUSION: DEC10-VEN represents an appropriate salvage therapy and may offer better responses and survival compared with IC in adults with R/R AML.
© 2021 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myeloid leukemia (AML); decitabine; intensive chemotherapy; refractory; relapsed; venetoclax

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34343352      PMCID: PMC8556232          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of complete remission with MRD negativity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Hind Rafei; Naval Daver; Hyunsoo Hwang; Jing Ning; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Tapan M Kadia; Courtney D DiNardo; Sa A Wang; Elias Jabbour; Uday Popat; Betul Oran; Jorge Cortes; Marina Konopleva; Musa Yilmaz; Ghayas C Issa; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: any progress?

Authors:  Richard F Schlenk; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Axel Benner; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Using Propensity Score Methods to Create Target Populations in Observational Clinical Research.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Fan Li; Michael Pencina
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Pankit Vachhani; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-03

6.  The Propensity Score.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  10-day decitabine with venetoclax for newly diagnosed intensive chemotherapy ineligible, and relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Abhishek Maiti; Caitlin R Rausch; Naveen Pemmaraju; Kiran Naqvi; Naval G Daver; Tapan M Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Maro Ohanian; Yesid Alvarado; Ghayas C Issa; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Nicholas J Short; Musa Yilmaz; Prithviraj Bose; Elias J Jabbour; Koichi Takahashi; Jan A Burger; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Nitin Jain; Steven M Kornblau; Philip A Thompson; Zeev Estrov; Lucia Masarova; Koji Sasaki; Srdan Verstovsek; Alessandra Ferrajoli; William G Weirda; Sa A Wang; Sergej Konoplev; Zhining Chen; Sherry A Pierce; Jing Ning; Wei Qiao; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Andreeff; John S Welch; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 18.959

8.  Venetoclax with decitabine vs intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score matched analysis stratified by risk of treatment-related mortality.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Wei Qiao; Koji Sasaki; Farhad Ravandi; Tapan M Kadia; Elias J Jabbour; Naval G Daver; Gautam Borthakur; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sherry A Pierce; Kathryn S Montalbano; Naveen Pemmaraju; Kiran Naqvi; Maro Ohanian; Nicholas J Short; Yesid Alvarado; Koichi Takahashi; Musa Yilmaz; Nitin Jain; Steven M Kornblau; Michael Andreeff; Prithviraj Bose; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Ghayas C Issa; Lucia Masarova; Philip A Thompson; Caitlin R Rausch; Jing Ning; Hagop M Kantarjian; Courtney D DiNardo; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 9.  How close are we to incorporating measurable residual disease into clinical practice for acute myeloid leukemia?

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Venetoclax as monotherapy and in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine in relapsed and treatment refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Smith Giri; Rong Wang; Robert T Williams; Martin S Tallman; Amer M Zeidan; Maximilian Stahl
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 9.941

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are Supporting Evidences Enough?

Authors:  Serena Brancati; Lucia Gozzo; Giovanni Luca Romano; Calogero Vetro; Ilaria Dulcamare; Cinzia Maugeri; Marina Parisi; Laura Longo; Daniela Cristina Vitale; Francesco Di Raimondo; Filippo Drago
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  How We Incorporate Venetoclax in Treatment Regimens for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 3.  New Perspectives in Treating Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Driving towards a Patient-Tailored Strategy.

Authors:  Fabio Andreozzi; Fulvio Massaro; Sebastian Wittnebel; Chloé Spilleboudt; Philippe Lewalle; Adriano Salaroli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maximilian Fleischmann; Sebastian Scholl; Jochen J Frietsch; Inken Hilgendorf; Karin Schrenk; Jakob Hammersen; Florian Prims; Christian Thiede; Andreas Hochhaus; Ulf Schnetzke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.322

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.