Literature DB >> 32895546

Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength.

Mark W Schurgin1, John T Wixted2, Timothy F Brady3.   

Abstract

Almost all models of visual memory implicitly assume that errors in mnemonic representations are linearly related to distance in stimulus space. Here we show that neither memory nor perception are appropriately scaled in stimulus space; instead, they are based on a transformed similarity representation that is nonlinearly related to stimulus space. This result calls into question a foundational assumption of extant models of visual working memory. Once psychophysical similarity is taken into account, aspects of memory that have been thought to demonstrate a fixed working memory capacity of around three or four items and to require fundamentally different representations-across different stimuli, tasks and types of memory-can be parsimoniously explained with a unitary signal detection framework. These results have substantial implications for the study of visual memory and lead to a substantial reinterpretation of the relationship between perception, working memory and long-term memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32895546     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  17 in total

1.  Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Laura Lazartigues; Frédéric Lavigne; Carlos Aguilar; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Patterns of episodic content and specificity predicting subjective memory vividness.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper; Maureen Ritchey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Working Memory: From Neural Activity to the Sentient Mind.

Authors:  Russell J Jaffe; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  The capacity and organization of gustatory working memory.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Kathrin Ohla; Shirley Xue Li Lim; Richard Höchenberger; Iryna Ruda; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Forgetting in visual working memory: Internal noise explains decay of feature representations.

Authors:  Crista Kuuramo; Jussi Saarinen; Ilmari Kurki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Effects of item distinctiveness on the retrieval of objects and object-location bindings from visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuri A Markov; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Local motion pooling is continuous, global motion perception is discrete.

Authors:  Marshall L Green; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  mixtur: An R package for designing, analysing, and modelling continuous report visual short-term memory studies.

Authors:  James A Grange; Stuart B Moore
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.