Literature DB >> 34131860

Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.

Laura Lazartigues1, Frédéric Lavigne2, Carlos Aguilar2, Nelson Cowan3, Fabien Mathy2.   

Abstract

Data compression in memory is a cognitive process allowing participants to cope with complexity to reduce information load. However, previous studies have not yet considered the hypothesis that this process could also lead to over-simplifying information due to haphazard amplification of the compression process itself. For instance, we could expect that the over-regularized features of a visual scene could produce false recognition of patterns, not because of storage capacity limits but because of an errant compression process. To prompt memory compression in our participants, we used multielement visual displays for which the underlying information varied in compressibility. The compressibility of our material could vary depending on the number of common features between the multi-dimensional objects in the displays. We measured both accuracy and response times by probing memory representations with probes that we hypothesized could modify the participants' representations. We confirm that more compressible information facilitates performance, but a more novel finding is that compression can produce both typical memory errors and lengthened response times. Our findings provide clearer evidence of the forms of compression that participants carry out.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity; Compression of information; Response times; Visual; Working memory

Year:  2021        PMID: 34131860     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02333-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  44 in total

1.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

2.  Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.

Authors:  Joël Bradmetz; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-09

3.  Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-04

4.  No evidence for a fixed object limit in working memory: Spatial ensemble representations inflate estimates of working memory capacity for complex objects.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Chunk formation in immediate memory and how it relates to data compression.

Authors:  Mustapha Chekaf; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-06-29

6.  A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Emma Y Wu; Masud Husain
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.