Literature DB >> 35199322

Effects of item distinctiveness on the retrieval of objects and object-location bindings from visual working memory.

Yuri A Markov1,2, Igor S Utochkin3.   

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) is prone to interference from stored items competing for its limited capacity. Distinctiveness or similarity of the items is acknowledged to affect this competition, such that poor item distinctiveness causes a failure to discriminate between items sharing common features. In three experiments, we studied how the distinctiveness of studied real-world objects (i.e., whether the objects belong to the same or different basic categories) affects the retrieval of objects themselves (simple recognition) and object-location conjunctions (information about which object was where in a display, cued recall). In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that distinctiveness did not affect memories for objects or for locations, but low-distinctive objects were more frequently reported at "swapped" locations that originally contained other objects, showing object-location memory swaps. In Experiments 3 we found that observers swapped the location of a tested object with another object from the same category more frequently than with any of the objects from another category. This suggests that more similar studied objects cause more retrieval competition in object-location judgments than in simple recognition. Additionally, we discuss a possible role of categorical labeling of locations that can support object-location retrieval when the studied objects are highly distinct.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  memory distinctiveness; object-location memory; recognition memory; swap errors; visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35199322     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02451-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  40 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

3.  Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Neuropsychological evidence for separating components of visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  S Darling; S Della Sala; R H Logie; A Cantagallo
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Verbal coding and the storage of form-position associations in visual-spatial short-term memory.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Mary M Smyth
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-10

7.  Working Memory in Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Evidence for Impaired Binding of Object Identity and Object Location.

Authors:  Haggar Cohen-Dallal; Nachum Soroker; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.