| Literature DB >> 32887379 |
Sayuri Fuse1, Tasuki Endo1, Riki Tanaka1, Miyuki Kuroiwa1, Akira Ando2, Ayami Kume1, Akiko Yamamoto3, Kanna Kuribayashi3, Shinji Somekawa3, Masamichi Takeshita4, Masaki Hashimoto5, Ryotaro Kime1, Yuko Kurosawa1, Takafumi Hamaoka1.
Abstract
Capsinoids are some of the most promising ingredients to increase energy expenditure (EE) due to brown adipose tissue (BAT) activation. However, there is limited information regarding the effect of prolonged capsinoid ingestion (CI) on BAT activity and resting EE (REE) in healthy, middle-aged, normal to overweight subjects (Subhealthy) with distinct BAT characteristics. We examined the changes in BAT density (BAT-d), using near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy, and REE/kg induced by daily CI. Forty Subhealthy [age, 43.8 (mean) years; BMI, 25.4 kg/m2] received either capsinoid (9 mg/day) or a placebo daily for 6 weeks in a double-blind design. Total hemoglobin concentration in the supraclavicular region ([total-Hb]sup), an indicator of BAT-d, and REE/kg were measured. The changes in post-intervention [total-Hb]sup were greater in the capsinoid group (CA-G) than in the placebo group (PL-G) [5.8 µM (+12.4%) versus 1.0 µM (+2.1%); p = 0.017]. There was a significant relationship between BAT-d and REE/kg; however, post-supplementation REE/kg was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.228). In the overweight subgroup, changes in REE/kg were greater in the CA-G than in the PL-G [0.6 cal/kg/min (+4.3%) versus -0.3 cal/kg/min (-2.1%); p = 0.021]. CI enhanced [total-Hb]sup, a reflection of BAT-d, showing a good correlation with REE in Subhealthy.Entities:
Keywords: brown adipose tissue; capsinoids; dihydrocapsiate; energy expenditure; middle-aged; near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32887379 PMCID: PMC7551765 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart for the selection of subjects. CA-G, capsinoid group; PL-G, placebo group.
Subject profiles and the average room temperature at each measurement point.
| Capsinoid ( | Placebo ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | Baseline | 3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | |
| Age (years) | 43.5 ± 7.9 | - | - | 43.1 ± 8.0 | - | - |
| Body weight (kg) | 75.1 ± 7.4 | 75.7 ± 7.4 | 75.1 ± 7.4 | 75.5 ± 7.4 | 76.0 ± 7.4 | 75.9 ± 7.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.2 ± 1.4 | 25.3 ± 1.5 | 25.2 ± 1.6 | 25.7 ± 1.3 | 25.8 ± 1.3 | 25.8 ± 1.3 |
| VATA (cm2) | 76.1 ± 34.9 | 71.9 ± 27.9 | 71.0 ± 30.9 | 78.1 ± 32.8 | 78.0 ± 33.8 | 80.5 ± 31.5 |
| [total-Hb]sup (µM) | 46.8 ± 16.0 | 55.1 ± 20.5 * | 52.7 ± 18.6 * | 47.2 ± 14.5 | 50.0 ± 16.3 | 48.2 ± 14.5 |
| REE/kg (cal/kg/min) | 14.5 ± 1.3 | - | 14.8 ± 1.1 | 14.4 ± 1.3 | - | 14.3 ± 1.3 |
| SFOC (µM O2/min) | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 1.2 |
| MOC (µM O2/min) | 13.0 ± 4.7 | 13.4 ± 4.3 | 13.0 ± 5.4 | 13.4 ± 5.7 | 13.0 ± 4.6 | 12.6 ± 5.2 |
| Average room temperature at the start and the end of measurements (°C) | 23.4 ± 0.4 | 23.9 ± 0.7 * | 24.4 ± 0.4 * | 23.3 ± 0.5 | 24.2 ± 0.6 * | 24.4 ± 0.5 * |
MOC, muscle oxygen consumption; REE/kg, resting energy expenditure per kg; SFOC, subcutaneous fat oxygen consumption; [total-Hb]sup, total hemoglobin concentration in the supraclavicular region; VATA, visceral adipose tissue area. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. [total-Hb]sup is an indicator of brown adipose tissue vascular density in the supraclavicular region. There was significant difference for time in each group (* p < 0.05, baseline versus 3 or 6 weeks), but not for groups analyzed by ANOVA.
Figure 2Mean (± SD) [total-Hb]sup, which is an indicator of brown adipose tissue vascular density in the supraclavicular region, at baseline and at 3 and 6 weeks after ingestion of capsinoid (●) and placebo (○) in all participants (n = 38) (A). Mean (± SD) changes in [total-Hb]sup after the 6-week intervention in all participants (n = 38) (B). There were significant intervention interactions (group × time, p = 0.008) and main effect on the time (p < 0.001), but no main effect on the group (p = 0.573) by using ANOVA. The post hoc comparison between baseline and 3 or 6 weeks showed a significant increase in the [total-Hb]sup (p < 0.001 for 3 weeks and p < 0.001 for 6 weeks, respectively) only in the CA-G (A; ** p < 0.01). A Welch test was conducted and it indicated that there was significant difference between the CA-G and PL-G (B; † p < 0.05). CA-G, capsinoid group; PL-G, placebo group; [total-Hb]sup, total hemoglobin concentration in the supraclavicular region.
Figure 3Mean (± SD) REE/kg at baseline and at 6 weeks after ingestion of capsinoid (●) and placebo (○) in all participants (n = 38) (A). Mean (± SD) changes in REE/kg after the 6-week intervention in all participants (n = 38) (B). There were no significant intervention interactions (group × time, p = 0.130) or main effects on the group (p = 0.497) or the time (p = 0.601) according to the ANOVA (A) results. A Welch test was conducted which indicated that there was a significant difference between the CA-G and PL-G (B). CA-G, capsinoid group; PL-G, placebo group; REE/kg, resting energy expenditure per kg.
Figure 4There were significant correlations between [total-Hb]sup and REE/kg in all participants pre-supplementation (A) and only in the CA-G in post-supplementation (B). Pearson’s correlation coefficient is denoted by r. CA-G, capsinoid group; PL-G, placebo group; REE/kg, resting energy expenditure per kg; [total-Hb]sup, total hemoglobin concentration in the supraclavicular region.
Figure 5Mean (± SD) REE/kg at baseline and after 6-week ingestion of capsinoid (●) and placebo (○) in the overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) subgroup (n = 24) (A). Mean (± SD) changes in REE/kg after the 6-week intervention in the overweight subgroup (n = 24) (B). There was a significant intervention interaction (group × time, p = 0.020); however, no main effects on the group (p = 0.957) or the time (p = 0.429) were observed by ANOVA. The post hoc comparison between baseline and 6 weeks showed a significant increase in REE/kg (p = 0.041) only in the CA-G (A; * p < 0.05). A Welch test was conducted which indicated that there was significant difference between the CA-G and PL-G (B; † p < 0.05). CA-G, capsinoid group; PL-G, placebo group; REE/kg, resting energy expenditure per kg.