Literature DB >> 32656535

Rapid Reconstruction of Four-dimensional MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta Using a Convolutional Neural Network.

Hassan Haji-Valizadeh1, Daming Shen1, Ryan J Avery1, Ali M Serhal1, Florian A Schiffers1, Aggelos K Katsaggelos1, Oliver S Cossairt1, Daniel Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To implement an integrated reconstruction pipeline including a graphics processing unit (GPU)-based convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture and test whether it reconstructs four-dimensional non-Cartesian, non-contrast material-enhanced MR angiographic k-space data faster than a central processing unit (CPU)-based compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction pipeline, without significant losses in data fidelity, summed visual score (SVS), or arterial vessel-diameter measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Raw k-space data of 24 patients (18 men and six women; mean age, 56.8 years ± 11.8 [standard deviation]) suspected of having thoracic aortic disease were used to evaluate the proposed reconstruction pipeline derived from an open-source three-dimensional CNN. For training, 4800 zero-filled images and the corresponding CS-reconstructed images from 10 patients were used as input-output pairs. For testing, 6720 zero-filled images from 14 different patients were used as inputs to a trained CNN. Metrics for evaluating the agreement between the CNN and CS images included reconstruction times, structural similarity index (SSIM) and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), SVS (3 = nondiagnostic, 9 = clinically acceptable, 15 = excellent), and vessel diameters.
RESULTS: The mean reconstruction time was 65 times and 69 times shorter for the CPU-based and GPU-based CNN pipelines (216.6 seconds ± 40.5 and 204.9 seconds ± 40.5), respectively, than for CS (14 152.3 seconds ± 1708.6) (P < .001). Compared with CS as practical ground truth, CNNs produced high data fidelity (SSIM = 0.94 ± 0.02, NRMSE = 2.8% ± 0.4) and not significantly different (P = .25) SVS and aortic diameters, except at one out of seven locations, where the percentage difference was only 3% (ie, clinically irrelevant).
CONCLUSION: The proposed integrated reconstruction pipeline including a CNN architecture is capable of rapidly reconstructing time-resolved volumetric cardiovascular MRI k-space data, without a significant loss in data quality, thereby supporting clinical translation of said non-contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32656535      PMCID: PMC7325698          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  20 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology,American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons,and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Nonenhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Mitsue Miyazaki; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Four-dimensional respiratory motion-resolved whole heart coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Davide Piccini; Li Feng; Gabriele Bonanno; Simone Coppo; Jérôme Yerly; Ruth P Lim; Juerg Schwitter; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  DAGAN: Deep De-Aliasing Generative Adversarial Networks for Fast Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Simiao Yu; Hao Dong; Greg Slabaugh; Pier Luigi Dragotti; Xujiong Ye; Fangde Liu; Simon Arridge; Jennifer Keegan; Yike Guo; David Firmin; Jennifer Keegan; Greg Slabaugh; Simon Arridge; Xujiong Ye; Yike Guo; Simiao Yu; Fangde Liu; David Firmin; Pier Luigi Dragotti; Guang Yang; Hao Dong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jo Schlemper; Jose Caballero; Joseph V Hajnal; Anthony N Price; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned.

Authors:  Dale R Broome; Mark S Girguis; Pedro W Baron; Alfred C Cottrell; Ingrid Kjellin; Gerald A Kirk
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  5D whole-heart sparse MRI.

Authors:  Li Feng; Simone Coppo; Davide Piccini; Jerome Yerly; Ruth P Lim; Pier Giorgio Masci; Matthias Stuber; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time phase contrast cardiovascular MRI via complex-difference deep learning.

Authors:  Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Rui Guo; Selcuk Kucukseymen; Amanda Paskavitz; Xiaoying Cai; Jennifer Rodriguez; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Daniel Kim; Warren Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Highly time-resolved 4D MR angiography using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI.

Authors:  Adam E Goldman-Yassen; Eytan Raz; Maria J Borja; Duan Chen; Anna Derman; Siddhant Dogra; Kai Tobias Block; Seena Dehkharghani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Rapid reconstruction of highly undersampled, non-Cartesian real-time cine k-space data using a perceptual complex neural network (PCNN).

Authors:  Daming Shen; Sushobhan Ghosh; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Ashitha Pathrose; Florian Schiffers; Daniel C Lee; Benjamin H Freed; Michael Markl; Oliver S Cossairt; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Daniel Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.044

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.