Literature DB >> 32871089

Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species.

Jeremy B Yoder1, Giancarlo Gomez1, Colin J Carlson2.   

Abstract

Botanists have long identified bilaterally symmetrical (zygomorphic) flowers with more specialized pollination interactions than radially symmetrical (actinomorphic) flowers. Zygomorphic flowers facilitate more precise contact with pollinators, guide pollinator behaviour and exclude less effective pollinators. However, whether zygomorphic flowers are actually visited by a smaller subset of available pollinator species has not been broadly evaluated. We compiled 53 609 floral visitation records in 159 communities and classified the plants' floral symmetry. Globally and within individual communities, plants with zygomorphic flowers are indeed visited by fewer species. At the same time, zygomorphic flowers share a somewhat larger proportion of their visitor species with other co-occurring plants and have particularly high sharing with co-occurring plants that also have zygomorphic flowers. Visitation sub-networks for zygomorphic species also show differences that may arise from reduced visitor diversity, including greater connectance, greater web asymmetry and lower coextinction robustness of both plants and visitor species-but these changes do not necessarily translate to whole plant-visitor communities. These results provide context for widely documented associations between zygomorphy and diversification and imply that species with zygomorphic flowers may face a greater risk of extinction due to pollinator loss.

Keywords:  ecological specialization; floral morphology; interaction networks; pollination

Year:  2020        PMID: 32871089      PMCID: PMC7532724          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  27 in total

1.  Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography.

Authors:  Gary G Mittelbach; Douglas W Schemske; Howard V Cornell; Andrew P Allen; Jonathan M Brown; Mark B Bush; Susan P Harrison; Allen H Hurlbert; Nancy Knowlton; Harilaos A Lessios; Christy M McCain; Amy R McCune; Lucinda A McDade; Mark A McPeek; Thomas J Near; Trevor D Price; Robert E Ricklefs; Kaustuv Roy; Dov F Sax; Dolph Schluter; James M Sobel; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  The modularity of pollination networks.

Authors:  Jens M Olesen; Jordi Bascompte; Yoko L Dupont; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  pez: phylogenetics for the environmental sciences.

Authors:  William D Pearse; Marc W Cadotte; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Anthony R Ives; Caroline M Tucker; Steve C Walker; Matthew R Helmus
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Context Dependence of Local Adaptation to Abiotic and Biotic Environments: A Quantitative and Qualitative Synthesis.

Authors:  Ryan D Briscoe Runquist; Amanda J Gorton; Jeremy B Yoder; Nicholas J Deacon; Jake J Grossman; Shan Kothari; Marta P Lyons; Seema N Sheth; Peter Tiffin; David A Moeller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Local Adaptation to Biotic Interactions: A Meta-analysis across Latitudes.

Authors:  Anna L Hargreaves; Rachel M Germain; Megan Bontrager; Joshua Persi; Amy L Angert
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation.

Authors:  Timothée Poisot; James D Bever; Adnane Nemri; Peter H Thrall; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Flower orientation enhances pollen transfer in bilaterally symmetrical flowers.

Authors:  Atushi Ushimaru; Ikumi Dohzono; Yasuoki Takami; Fujio Hyodo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification.

Authors:  Hervé Sauquet; Maria von Balthazar; Susana Magallón; James A Doyle; Peter K Endress; Emily J Bailes; Erica Barroso de Morais; Kester Bull-Hereñu; Laetitia Carrive; Marion Chartier; Guillaume Chomicki; Mario Coiro; Raphaël Cornette; Juliana H L El Ottra; Cyril Epicoco; Charles S P Foster; Florian Jabbour; Agathe Haevermans; Thomas Haevermans; Rebeca Hernández; Stefan A Little; Stefan Löfstrand; Javier A Luna; Julien Massoni; Sophie Nadot; Susanne Pamperl; Charlotte Prieu; Elisabeth Reyes; Patrícia Dos Santos; Kristel M Schoonderwoerd; Susanne Sontag; Anaëlle Soulebeau; Yannick Staedler; Georg F Tschan; Amy Wing-Sze Leung; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species.

Authors:  Jeremy B Yoder; Giancarlo Gomez; Colin J Carlson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ongoing decline in insect-pollinated plants across Danish grasslands.

Authors:  Bodil K Ehlers; Thomas Bataillon; Christian F Damgaard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.