Literature DB >> 32097037

Local Adaptation to Biotic Interactions: A Meta-analysis across Latitudes.

Anna L Hargreaves, Rachel M Germain, Megan Bontrager, Joshua Persi, Amy L Angert.   

Abstract

Adaptation to local conditions can increase species' geographic distributions and rates of diversification, but which components of the environment commonly drive local adaptation-particularly the importance of biotic interactions-is unclear. Biotic interactions should drive local adaptation when they impose consistent divergent selection; if this is common, we expect transplant experiments to detect more frequent and stronger local adaptation when biotic interactions are left intact. We tested this hypothesis using a meta-analysis of transplant experiments from >125 studies (mostly of plants). Overall, local adaptation was common, and biotic interactions affected fitness. Nevertheless, local adaptation was neither more common nor stronger when biotic interactions were left intact, either between experimental treatments within studies (control vs. biotic interactions experimentally manipulated) or between studies that used natural versus biotically altered transplant environments. However, the effect of ameliorating negative interactions varied with latitude, suggesting that interactions may promote local adaptation more often in tropical than in temperate ecosystems, although few tropical studies were available to test this. Our results suggest that biotic interactions often fail to drive local adaptation even though they strongly affect fitness, perhaps because temperate biotic environments are unpredictable at the spatiotemporal scales required for local adaptation.

Keywords:  competition; local adaptation; meta-analysis; species interactions; translocation experiments; transplant experiments

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097037     DOI: 10.1086/707323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species.

Authors:  Jeremy B Yoder; Giancarlo Gomez; Colin J Carlson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Primary and Secondary Metabolite Profiles of Lodgepole Pine Trees Change with Elevation, but Not with Latitude.

Authors:  Melanie Mullin; J G Klutsch; J A Cale; A Hussain; S Zhao; C Whitehouse; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Large genetic divergence underpins cryptic local adaptation across ecological and evolutionary gradients.

Authors:  Morgan M Sparks; Joshua C Kraft; Kliffi M S Blackstone; Gordon G McNickle; Mark R Christie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Putative biotic drivers of plant phenology: With special reference to pathogens and deciduousness.

Authors:  Rowland D Burdon; Michael J Bartlett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide.

Authors:  Yonglin Zhong; Chengjin Chu; Jonathan A Myers; Gregory S Gilbert; James A Lutz; Jonas Stillhard; Kai Zhu; Jill Thompson; Jennifer L Baltzer; Fangliang He; Joseph A LaManna; Stuart J Davies; Kristina J Aderson-Teixeira; David F R P Burslem; Alfonso Alonso; Kuo-Jung Chao; Xugao Wang; Lianming Gao; David A Orwig; Xue Yin; Xinghua Sui; Zhiyao Su; Iveren Abiem; Pulchérie Bissiengou; Norm Bourg; Nathalie Butt; Min Cao; Chia-Hao Chang-Yang; Wei-Chun Chao; Hazel Chapman; Yu-Yun Chen; David A Coomes; Susan Cordell; Alexandre A de Oliveira; Hu Du; Suqin Fang; Christian P Giardina; Zhanqing Hao; Andrew Hector; Stephen P Hubbell; David Janík; Patrick A Jansen; Mingxi Jiang; Guangze Jin; David Kenfack; Kamil Král; Andrew J Larson; Buhang Li; Xiankun Li; Yide Li; Juyu Lian; Luxiang Lin; Feng Liu; Yankun Liu; Yu Liu; Fuchen Luan; Yahuang Luo; Keping Ma; Yadvinder Malhi; Sean M McMahon; William McShea; Hervé Memiaghe; Xiangcheng Mi; Mike Morecroft; Vojtech Novotny; Michael J O'Brien; Jan den Ouden; Geoffrey G Parker; Xiujuan Qiao; Haibao Ren; Glen Reynolds; Pavel Samonil; Weiguo Sang; Guochun Shen; Zhiqiang Shen; Guo-Zhang Michael Song; I-Fang Sun; Hui Tang; Songyan Tian; Amanda L Uowolo; María Uriarte; Bin Wang; Xihua Wang; Youshi Wang; George D Weiblen; Zhihong Wu; Nianxun Xi; Wusheng Xiang; Han Xu; Kun Xu; Wanhui Ye; Mingjian Yu; Fuping Zeng; Minhua Zhang; Yingming Zhang; Li Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Effects of species interactions on the potential for evolution at species' range limits.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Daniel Z Atwater; Robert I Colautti; Anna L Hargreaves
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sympatry leads to reduced body condition in chickadees that occasionally hybridize.

Authors:  Kathryn C Grabenstein; Ken A Otter; Theresa M Burg; Scott A Taylor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Plant-associate interactions and diversification across trophic levels.

Authors:  Jeremy B Yoder; Albert Dang; Caitlin MacGregor; Mikhail Plaza
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-09-18

9.  Population genetic differentiation and genomic signatures of adaptation to climate in an abundant lizard.

Authors:  Maravillas Ruiz Miñano; Geoffrey M While; Weizhao Yang; Christopher P Burridge; Daniele Salvi; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.832

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.