Mona Nasseri1, Vaclav Kremen1,2, Petr Nejedly1, Inyong Kim1, Su-Youne Chang3,4, Hang Joon Jo1, Hari Guragain1, Nathaniel Nelson1, Edward Patterson5, Beverly K Sturges6, Chelsea M Crowe6, Tim Denison7, Benjamin H Brinkmann1,3, Gregory A Worrell1,3. 1. Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, MN, USA. 6. Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. 7. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conventional selection of pre-ictal EEG epochs for seizure prediction algorithm training data typically assumes a continuous pre-ictal brain state preceding a seizure. This is carried out by defining a fixed duration, pre-ictal time period before seizures from which pre-ictal training data epochs are uniformly sampled. However, stochastic physiological and pathological fluctuations in EEG data characteristics and underlying brain states suggest that pre-ictal state dynamics may be more complex, and selection of pre-ictal training data segments to reflect this could improve algorithm performance. METHODS: We propose a semi-supervised technique to select pre-ictal training data most distinguishable from interictal EEG according to pre-specified data characteristics. The proposed method uses hierarchical clustering to identify optimal pre-ictal data epochs. RESULTS: In this paper we compare the performance of a seizure forecasting algorithm with and without hierarchical clustering of pre-ictal periods in chronic iEEG recordings from six canines with naturally occurring epilepsy. Hierarchical clustering of training data improved results for Time In Warning (TIW) (0.18 vs. 0.23) and False Positive Rate (FPR) (0.5 vs. 0.59) when evaluated across all subjects (p<0.001, n=6). Results were mixed when evaluating TIW, FPR, and Sensitivity for individual dogs. CONCLUSION: Hierarchical clustering is a helpful method for training data selection overall, but should be evaluated on a subject-wise basis. SIGNIFICANCE: The clustering method can be used to optimize results of forecasting towards sensitivity or TIW or FPR, and therefore can be useful for epilepsy management.
OBJECTIVE: Conventional selection of pre-ictal EEG epochs for seizure prediction algorithm training data typically assumes a continuous pre-ictal brain state preceding a seizure. This is carried out by defining a fixed duration, pre-ictal time period before seizures from which pre-ictal training data epochs are uniformly sampled. However, stochastic physiological and pathological fluctuations in EEG data characteristics and underlying brain states suggest that pre-ictal state dynamics may be more complex, and selection of pre-ictal training data segments to reflect this could improve algorithm performance. METHODS: We propose a semi-supervised technique to select pre-ictal training data most distinguishable from interictal EEG according to pre-specified data characteristics. The proposed method uses hierarchical clustering to identify optimal pre-ictal data epochs. RESULTS: In this paper we compare the performance of a seizure forecasting algorithm with and without hierarchical clustering of pre-ictal periods in chronic iEEG recordings from six canines with naturally occurring epilepsy. Hierarchical clustering of training data improved results for Time In Warning (TIW) (0.18 vs. 0.23) and False Positive Rate (FPR) (0.5 vs. 0.59) when evaluated across all subjects (p<0.001, n=6). Results were mixed when evaluating TIW, FPR, and Sensitivity for individual dogs. CONCLUSION: Hierarchical clustering is a helpful method for training data selection overall, but should be evaluated on a subject-wise basis. SIGNIFICANCE: The clustering method can be used to optimize results of forecasting towards sensitivity or TIW or FPR, and therefore can be useful for epilepsy management.
Authors: Kathryn A Davis; Beverly K Sturges; Charles H Vite; Vanessa Ruedebusch; Gregory Worrell; Andrew B Gardner; Kent Leyde; W Douglas Sheffield; Brian Litt Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Scott Stanslaski; Jeffrey Herron; Tom Chouinard; Duane Bourget; Ben Isaacson; Vaclav Kremen; Enrico Opri; William Drew; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Aysegul Gunduz; Tom Adamski; Gregory A Worrell; Timothy Denison Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.833
Authors: Iryna Korshunova; Pieter-Jan Kindermans; Jonas Degrave; Thibault Verhoeven; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Joni Dambre Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Hoameng Ung; Kathryn A Davis; Drausin Wulsin; Joost Wagenaar; Emily Fox; John J McDonnell; Ned Patterson; Charles H Vite; Gregory Worrell; Brian Litt Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Yogatheesan Varatharajah; Ravishankar K Iyer; Brent M Berry; Gregory A Worrell; Benjamin H Brinkmann Journal: Int J Neural Syst Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 5.866
Authors: Mark J Cook; Terence J O'Brien; Samuel F Berkovic; Michael Murphy; Andrew Morokoff; Gavin Fabinyi; Wendyl D'Souza; Raju Yerra; John Archer; Lucas Litewka; Sean Hosking; Paul Lightfoot; Vanessa Ruedebusch; W Douglas Sheffield; David Snyder; Kent Leyde; David Himes Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Levin Kuhlmann; Philippa Karoly; Dean R Freestone; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Andriy Temko; Alexandre Barachant; Feng Li; Gilberto Titericz; Brian W Lang; Daniel Lavery; Kelly Roman; Derek Broadhead; Scott Dobson; Gareth Jones; Qingnan Tang; Irina Ivanenko; Oleg Panichev; Timothée Proix; Michal Náhlík; Daniel B Grunberg; Chip Reuben; Gregory Worrell; Brian Litt; David T J Liley; David B Grayden; Mark J Cook Journal: Brain Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Tal Pal Attia; Pedro F Viana; Mona Nasseri; Jonas Duun-Henriksen; Andrea Biondi; Joel S Winston; Isabel P Martins; Ewan S Nurse; Matthias Dümpelmann; Gregory A Worrell; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Troels W Kjaer; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Mark P Richardson Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 6.740
Authors: Mona Nasseri; Tal Pal Attia; Boney Joseph; Nicholas M Gregg; Ewan S Nurse; Pedro F Viana; Gregory Worrell; Matthias Dümpelmann; Mark P Richardson; Dean R Freestone; Benjamin H Brinkmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tal Pal Attia; Daniel Crepeau; Vaclav Kremen; Mona Nasseri; Hari Guragain; Steven W Steele; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Filip Mivalt; Jeffrey A Herron; Matt Stead; Timothy Denison; Gregory A Worrell; Benjamin H Brinkmann Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.003