Literature DB >> 32855189

CT-Based Measurements of Facial Parameters of Healthy Children and Adolescents in Thailand.

N Jullabussapa1, K Khwanngern2, C Pateekhum3, C Angkurawaranon3, S Angkurawaranon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Facial parameters are used for evaluating normal growth patterns, diagnosing patients with craniofacial abnormalities, and planning surgical procedures. However, these parameters vary by ethnicity and race. This study aims to describe soft-tissue and bony facial parameters based on CT of healthy pediatric and adolescent patients in Thailand.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT imaging of the brain, orbit, facial bones, and neck was performed at Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital, in patients from birth to 19 years old. Patients with known syndromic disease, craniofacial syndrome, facial trauma and/or infection, and previous surgery that deformed the study area were excluded. The key points of measurement were soft-tissue intercanthal, bony interorbital, and bony lateral orbital distances.
RESULTS: There were 932 patients: 554 males (59.4%) and 378 females (40.6%). Facial parameters rapidly increased in the first 2 years of life. Significant differences in these parameters between the males and females were found at the age of ≥15 years. However, ratios of the interorbital to the lateral orbital distance were generally consistent among age groups in both sexes, at 0.25.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, in Thailand, provides detailed age- and sex-specific normative data of the craniofacial measurements in children and adolescences based on CT imaging. These data can be used for evaluating individual patients with craniofacial abnormalities as well as determining the treatment in Thai and Asian populations, in whom craniofacial abnormalities, for example, frontoethmoidal encephalomeningocele, are common.
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32855189      PMCID: PMC7661077          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  27 in total

1.  Differences between direct (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull.

Authors:  Leslie G Farkas; Bryan D Tompson; Marko J Katic; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.

Authors:  Thuy T Le; Leslie G Farkas; Rexon C K Ngim; L Scott Levin; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Incidence of Associated Brain and Ophthalmic Anomalies in Frontoethmoidal Encephalomeningocele Evaluated by Multidetector Computed Tomography Facial Bone Imaging.

Authors:  Netsiri Dumrongpisutikul; Atip Triampo; Pun Janthanimi; Sukalaya Lerdlum
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; C E Poggio; J H Schmitz
Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future.

Authors:  L G Farkas
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1996-01

6.  Normative Data of the Interorbital Distance in Thai Population.

Authors:  Chalermpong Chatdokmaiprai; Kidakorn Kiranantawat; Panuwat Lertsithichai; Patamintita Taeshineetanakul
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Inner intercanthal and interorbital distances.

Authors:  H P Freihofer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1980-11

8.  Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females.

Authors:  Leslie G Farkas; Marko J Katic; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  S R Matteson; W Bechtold; C Phillips; E V Staab
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Varied Definitions of Nasolabial Angle: Searching for Consensus Among Rhinoplasty Surgeons and an Algorithm for Selecting the Ideal Method.

Authors:  Ryan Harris; Purushottam Nagarkar; Bardia Amirlak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  An optimal deep learning framework for multi-type hemorrhagic lesions detection and quantification in head CT images for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Aniwat Phaphuangwittayakul; Yi Guo; Fangli Ying; Ahmad Yahya Dawod; Salita Angkurawaranon; Chaisiri Angkurawaranon
Journal:  Appl Intell (Dordr)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.019

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.