Literature DB >> 11887005

Differences between direct (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull.

Leslie G Farkas1, Bryan D Tompson, Marko J Katic, Christopher R Forrest.   

Abstract

This study sought to determine the relative reliability of indirect cephalometric measurements and direct anthropometric ones taken in norma frontalis of 25 dry adult human skulls. Six of the 11 linear projective measurements were singular and located in the orbital, middle, and lower parts of the face, with two from each part. Two of the five paired measurements were taken in the orbital region on both sides, and the other three were taken in the middle to lower face between the midpoint of the facial axis and the landmarks lateral to it. Both singular and paired cephalometric distances were significantly shorter than the anthropometric distances. Mean numerical differences were much greater in paired measurements than in singular ones. The differences between these two sets of findings are a result of the uneven position of the landmarks used for measurement, located, as they are, on different planes of the face. These differences are undetectable by two-dimensional cephalograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887005     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200201000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  12 in total

1.  The thickness and the lengths of the anterior wall of adult maxilla of the West Anatolian Turkish people.

Authors:  Candan Arman; Ipek Ergür; Atay Atabey; Mustafa Güvencer; Amac Kiray; Esin Korman; Suleyman Tetik
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Combined soft and skeletal tissue modelling of normal and dysmorphic midface postnatal development.

Authors:  Amel Ibrahim; Michael Suttie; Neil W Bulstrode; Jonathan A Britto; David Dunaway; Peter Hammond; Patrizia Ferretti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Profiles of facial soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment in female adults.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Xian Wang; Zaixiu Qin; Hao Zhang; Donghui Guo; Yuerong Xu; Zuolin Jin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Surface cephalometric and anthropometric variables in OSA patients: statistical models for the OSA phenotype.

Authors:  Rita A Perri; Kristina Kairaitis; Peter Cistulli; John R Wheatley; Terence C Amis
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  CT-Based Measurements of Facial Parameters of Healthy Children and Adolescents in Thailand.

Authors:  N Jullabussapa; K Khwanngern; C Pateekhum; C Angkurawaranon; S Angkurawaranon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition.

Authors:  Noyan Aynechi; Brent E Larson; Vladimir Leon-Salazar; Soraya Beiraghi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Nostril Morphometry Evaluation before and after Cleft Lip Surgical Correction: Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Mario Jorge Frassy Feijo; Stella Ramos Brandão; Rui Manoel Rodrigues Pereira; Mariana Batista de Souza Santos; Hilton Justino da Silva
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-06

8.  Digital analysis of the orbit using the non-referring method.

Authors:  Tomasz Lepich; Józefa Dąbek; Mieczysław Piechota; Grzegorz Bajor; Lukasz Aniszewski; Jarosław Markowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.

Authors:  Adriana M Torres-Restrepo; Ana M Quintero-Monsalve; Juan F Giraldo-Mira; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Natalia Vélez-Trujillo; Paola Botero-Mariaca
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview.

Authors:  Stephen Richmond; Laurence J Howe; Sarah Lewis; Evie Stergiakouli; Alexei Zhurov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.