Literature DB >> 18046155

Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females.

Leslie G Farkas1, Marko J Katic, Christopher R Forrest.   

Abstract

Surgical correction of craniofacial disfigurements depends for its success on precise knowledge of the craniofacial norms of the patient's racial/ethnic groups. The norms of North American whites should be restricted to patients of Caucasian origin and not applied to members of other races. This study therefore sought to determine differences in anthropometric measurements of the craniofacial complex between African-American and North American white subjects of both sexes and of similar age (18-25 years old). The study group consisted of healthy young adult African-Americans, 50 males and 50 females. The analysis of craniofacial morphology was based on 51 anthropometric measurements: 9 cranial, 10 facial, 8 orbital, 14 nasal, 4 oral and 6 auricular. The results were compared with 51 norms previously established for North American whites in the same age group, generally based on 109 males and 200 females, fewer in comparisons of some nasal measurements (ac-ac, sbal-sbal, ac-sn, nostril axis). Highly significant differences between groups were found in every craniofacial region, especially in the orbital and nasal areas, and confirmed the need to establish separate norms for African-Americans to guide corrective surgery of the head and face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046155     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000258954.55068.b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  14 in total

1.  Variations of structural components: specific intercultural differences in facial morphology, skin type, and structures.

Authors:  Aisha McKnight; Adeyiza O Momoh; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Influence of anthropometry, TMD, and sex on molar bite force in adolescents with and without orthodontic needs.

Authors:  Barbara de Lima Lucas; Taís de Souza Barbosa; Paula Midori Castelo; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  CT-Based Measurements of Facial Parameters of Healthy Children and Adolescents in Thailand.

Authors:  N Jullabussapa; K Khwanngern; C Pateekhum; C Angkurawaranon; S Angkurawaranon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Racial Variations in Velopharyngeal and Craniometric Morphology in Children: An Imaging Study.

Authors:  Lakshmi Kollara; Jamie L Perry; Suzanne Hudson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4- to 9-year old children using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; Lakshmi Kollara; David P Kuehn; Bradley P Sutton; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

6.  Normative findings for periocular anthropometric measurements among Chinese young adults in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Yasas S N Jayaratne; Curtis K Deutsch; Roger A Zwahlen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula.

Authors:  Maisa O Al-Sebaei
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Updating Standards of Facial Growth in Romanian Children and Adolescents Using the Anthropometric Method-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Emilia Ogodescu; Malina Popa; Magda Luca; Andreea Igna; Mariana Miron; Krisztina Martha; Anca Tudor; Carmen Todea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.

Authors:  Adriana M Torres-Restrepo; Ana M Quintero-Monsalve; Juan F Giraldo-Mira; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Natalia Vélez-Trujillo; Paola Botero-Mariaca
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  The isolated orbital floor fracture from a transconjunctival or subciliary perspective-A standardized anthropometric evaluation.

Authors:  Gregor Raschke; Gabriel Djedovic; Andre Peisker; Rene Wohlrath; Ulrich Rieger; Arndt Guentsch; Marta Gomez-Dammeier; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.