Literature DB >> 6359318

Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: a review and a study of power.

S Greenland.   

Abstract

Tests for statistical interaction have come into increasing use in epidemiologic analysis, with most based on either an additive or multiplicative model for joint effects. Further procedures have been proposed for testing the goodness-of-fit and comparing the fit of the latter models. This paper reviews the relationships between the various tests and model comparison methods, and, for the special case of two dichotomous risk factors, presents asymptotic power functions for tests of additivity and multiplicativity. For a range of sample sizes and factor effects, the powers of the tests are computed using both the asymptotic power function and simulation studies. The powers of the tests are very low in several commonly encountered situations. In addition, convergence to the asymptotic distribution appears slow for some of the statistics. The results also indicate that likelihood comparison procedures can provide a useful adjunct to the classical hypothesis-testing approach.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6359318     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780020219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  88 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 3.  Frequency of treatment-effect modification affecting indirect comparisons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Coory; Susan Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Which of these things is not like the others?

Authors:  Jay S Kaufman; Richard F MacLehose
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations.

Authors:  Ramal Moonesinghe; Muin J Khoury; Tiebin Liu; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Estimation of the relative excess risk due to interaction and associated confidence bounds.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Bioavailable serum estradiol may alter radiation risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Eric J Grant; John B Cologne; Gerald B Sharp; Hidetaka Eguchi; Richard G Stevens; Shizue Izumi; Young-Min Kim; Amy Berrington de González; Waka Ohishi; Kei Nakachi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Remarks on antagonism.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Mirjam J Knol
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Gene-environment interaction: definitions and study designs.

Authors:  R Ottman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Maternal hormonal contraceptive use and offspring overweight or obesity.

Authors:  E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; D Moster; P B Juliusson; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.