Interleukin-6 in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder pathophysiology.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder that preferentially affects the spinal cord and optic nerve. Most patients with NMOSD experience severe relapses that lead to permanent neurologic disability; therefore, limiting frequency and severity of these attacks is the primary goal of disease management. Currently, patients are treated with immunosuppressants. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that is significantly elevated in the serum and the CSF of patients with NMOSD. IL-6 may have multiple roles in NMOSD pathophysiology by promoting plasmablast survival, stimulating the production of antibodies against aquaporin-4, disrupting blood-brain barrier integrity and functionality, and enhancing proinflammatory T-lymphocyte differentiation and activation. Case series have shown decreased relapse rates following IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade in patients with NMOSD, and 2 recent phase 3 randomized controlled trials confirmed that IL-6R inhibition reduces the risk of relapses in NMOSD. As such, inhibition of IL-6 activity represents a promising emerging therapy for the management of NMOSD manifestations. In this review, we summarize the role of IL-6 in the context of NMOSD.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a soluble, pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key part in many biologic processes.[1] It is a primary regulator of acute and chronic inflammation and hematopoiesis, contributing to the onset and maintenance of various autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.[1]

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an uncommon, often debilitating, inflammatory condition of the CNS.[2] Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) was previously considered a rare, severe variant of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, it is now recognized as a distinct autoimmune disorder.[2] An International Panel for NMO Diagnosis codified clinical, radiologic, and laboratory features collectively distinguishing NMOSD from MS and other CNS inflammatory disorders.[2] Left untreated, patients with NMOSD experience new attacks or relapses, often leading to permanent disability.[3]

The pathophysiologic processes and inflammatory cascade in NMOSD are complex and not fully understood. Circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1 antibodies targeting the astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) have been found almost exclusively in patients with NMOSD.[3] AQP4-IgG binding to astrocytic AQP4 leads to classical complement cascade activation and granulocyte and lymphocyte infiltration that combine to damage neural tissues.[4,5]

IL-6 may drive disease activity in NMOSD by promoting plasmablast survival, stimulating AQP4-IgG secretion, reducing blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and functionality, and enhancing proinflammatory T-lymphocyte differentiation and activation (figure A). CSF and serum IL-6 levels are significantly elevated in patients with NMOSD, and IL-6 inhibition has been shown to improve disease control (table 1). Therefore, the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) represents a promising therapeutic target for NMOSD relapse prevention. This review summarizes the role of IL-6 in NMOSD.

Figure

Potential roles of IL-6 signaling and inhibition in NMOSD pathophysiology and treatment

(A) Potential roles for IL-6 signaling in NMOSD pathophysiology. IL-6 induces differentiation of inflammatory Th17 cells from naive T cells, which in turn provide support to AQP4-dependent activated B cells. IL-6 also promotes differentiation of B cells into plasmablasts, inducing production of pathogenic AQP4-IgG. These events are followed by increased BBB permeability to antibodies and proinflammatory cell infiltration into the CNS, leading to binding of AQP4-IgG to AQP4 channels on the astrocytes. In response to stimulation by proinflammatory cytokines, astrocytes produce IL-6, which promotes demyelination and contributes to oligodendrocyte and axon damage. (B) Schematic of IL-6 signaling with potential modes of therapeutic inhibition. IL-6 can bind either to the membrane-bound (classic signaling) or soluble form (trans-signaling) of the IL-6R α receptor. IL-6 trans-signaling allows for the activation of cells that do not express the IL-6R α receptor. Classic signaling may be blocked by antibodies against IL-6 and IL-6R. Trans-signaling may be blocked by antibodies against IL-6R or the soluble form of glycoprotein 130 (sgp130). IL-6 signaling is mediated at the plasma membrane through the homodimerization of gp130, which activates the intracellular JAK-STAT and SHP2-MAPK signaling pathways. AQP4 = aquaporin-4; AQP4-IgG = aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G; BBB = blood-brain barrier; CDC = complement-dependent cytotoxicity; CDCC = complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; D1-D3 = subdomain of IL-6Rα; IL-1β = interleukin-1β; IL-6 = interleukin-6; JAK/STAT = Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription; MAC = membrane attack complex; mAbs = monoclonal antibodies; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; sgp130 = soluble glycoprotein 130; SHP2/MAPK = Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-2/mitogen-activated protein kinase; STAT3 = signal transducers and activators of transcription 3; Th = T helper cell; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor α; Treg = regulatory T cell.

Table 1

Clinical case reports on IL-6R blockade in the treatment of patients with NMOSDa

Interleukin-6

Biological activities

IL-6 is produced by diverse cell types, such as T cells, B cells, monocytes, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and mesangial cells.[6] IL-6 is involved in many physiologic processes, including inflammation, antigen-specific immune responses, host defense mechanisms, hematopoiesis, and production of acute phase proteins.[6] Outside the immune system, IL-6 can promote angiogenesis, osteoclast differentiation, and keratinocyte and mesangial cell proliferation.[7] Within the immune system, IL-6 plays a key part in the adaptive immune response by stimulating antibody production and effector T-cell development.[7] Furthermore, IL-6 has an important role in regulating the balance between proinflammatory T helper (Th) 17 cells and regulatory T cells (Treg).[7]

IL-6 binds to the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), which is expressed as membrane-bound (mIL-6R) and soluble (sIL-6R) forms.[8] The sIL-6R binds to IL-6 with a similar affinity as the mIL-6R, and both receptors interact with glycoprotein 130 (gp130, also known as IL-6R subunit β) to initiate cellular signaling through the Src homology region 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2/mitogen-activated protein kinase and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 protein pathways (figure B).[8] Importantly, cells that do not express IL-6R and are therefore not responsive to IL-6 can be stimulated by the complex of sIL-6R–IL-6 (IL-6 trans-signaling). IL-6 trans-signaling can be selectively blocked by the soluble form of gp130 (sgp130Fc)—which is dimerized by a human immunoglobulin IgG1-Fc—without affecting IL-6 signaling via the membrane-bound IL-6R.[8]

Pathogenic role

Dysregulation of IL-6 expression or signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of various human diseases and is linked to inflammatory and/or lymphoproliferative disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Castleman disease, multiple myeloma, giant cell arteritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).[8] The pathways driving IL-6 secretion from CNS-resident cells are complex. Neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells produce IL-6 following injury, and CSF IL-6 levels are elevated in multiple neuroinflammatory diseases.[9]

Dysregulation of IL-6 signaling may aggravate the inflammatory response in some CNS diseases; however, intrathecal IL-6 production may have variable effects. Because the IL-6R is expressed on both oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and microglia, CNS IL-6 signaling may have both direct and indirect effects on microglial and macroglial survival. In rat cerebral ischemic injury, it was shown that IL-6 modulates a decrease in neuronal and BBB integrity in the CNS.[10] In addition, intrathecal IL-6 production during CNS inflammation has been demonstrated to affect BBB permeability.[11] How these roles interact to promote CNS injury in autoimmune disease requires further research.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Overview

NMOSD is a rare, debilitating, autoimmune condition of the CNS, characterized by inflammatory lesions predominantly in the spinal cord and optic nerves.[4] Patients with NMOSD may present with a variety of symptoms, but most commonly with optic neuritis and myelitis. Optic neuritis or the inflammation of the contiguous optic chiasm causes acute visual impairment and eye pain. Myelitis causes varying degrees of motor paralysis, sensory loss, pain, or bladder and bowel dysfunction associated with MRI evidence of longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) lesions. NMOSD may also lead to intractable hiccups, nausea, or vomiting due to area postrema lesion inflammation; brainstem dysfunction; or encephalopathy.[12] Most patients with NMOSD experience a more severe disease course than do patients with MS due to frequent and severe relapses that lead to early and incremental disability. A benign disease course of NMOSD is rare.[13] Limiting frequency and severity of relapses represents a primary goal in NMOSD management.[14]

If patients are not treated, 49% and 70% of patients relapse within 1 and 2 years, respectively.[15] The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) in patient cohorts ranges from 0.82 to 1.34, with a median time to first relapse of 14 months.[15] The mortality rate without treatment ranges from 9% to 32%, depending on age, relapse rate, and recovery from attacks.[16]

In 2004, the identification of AQP4-IgG greatly facilitated differentiation of NMO from MS,[17] and in 2006, AQP4-IgG serology was incorporated into the revised NMO diagnostic criteria.[18] An international expert panel in 2015 proposed a unifying term for the disease as NMOSD, with further stratification by AQP4-IgG serologic status.[2]

Pathophysiology

NMOSD is recognized as a humoral immune disease driven in most patients by the presence of AQP4-IgG.[19] As a result, initial attention has focused on B-cell autoimmunity in NMOSD. However, polymorphonuclear infiltration into the CNS is a prominent feature of active disease and is characteristic of Th17-mediated pathology.[20] Furthermore, clinical worsening in response to interferon-β therapy in patients with NMOSD is also characteristic of Th17-mediated inflammatory processes. Thus, T-cell autoimmunity may also play a part in disease pathogenesis.[20]

Role of AQP4

AQP4 is the most abundant water channel in the CNS and has a key role in transcellular water transport.[21] AQP4 function may also affect neuroinflammation, astrocyte migration, and neuroexcitation. Within the CNS, AQP4 is expressed in the endfeet of astrocytes that surround the blood vessels and subarachnoid space and in retinal Mueller cells. It is particularly enriched in brain parenchyma interfacing with the CSF.[21]

AQP4-IgG has a critical role in mediating CNS injury in NMOSD. AQP4-IgG is detected in ∼70% of patients with NMOSD, but not in patients with MS or other neurologic diseases.[22] In AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients with NMOSD, CNS injury initiates with the binding of AQP4-IgG to AQP4 on perivascular astrocyte endfeet.[4] Autoantibody binding results in activation of the classical complement cascade, granulocyte and macrophage infiltration, secondary oligodendrocyte damage, and neuronal death.[4] CSF analysis of patients with NMOSD suggests that the majority of AQP4-IgG may transit passively to the CNS through an open BBB.[22] However, molecular techniques show that AQP4-IgG is also produced intrathecally during acute NMOSD exacerbations.[23]

Whether AQP4-IgG–seronegative patients with NMOSD have the same disease as AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients remains controversial. The demographics, clinical presentation, and prognosis differ between AQP4-IgG–seropositive and AQP4-IgG–seronegative patients.[24] Some AQP4-IgG–seronegative patients are seropositive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)–IgG; however, MOG-IgG–seropositive patients show differences in natural history, neuroimaging, and lesion histopathology from AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients, supporting a distinct pathophysiology between these disorders.[25]

Role of the BBB

Disruption of the BBB is important in the pathophysiology of NMOSD and correlates modestly with disease activity. Intrathecal production of AQP4-IgG[23] may initiate disease activity by causing focal BBB breakdown and precipitating a large influx of serum AQP4-IgG and serum complement into the CNS compartment. Alternatively, systemic inflammation may disrupt the BBB, allowing entry of serum AQP4-IgG and autoreactive B cells into the CNS and subsequent lesion formation.[19]

A recent study demonstrated that some serum samples taken from patients with NMOSD and SLE harbor autoantibodies against the 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78-IgG). These autoantibodies bind to brain microvascular endothelial cells, resulting in nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cell nuclear translocation, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 induction, reduced tight junction expression, and barrier permeability.[26] Peripheral administration of recombinant GRP78-IgG to mice resulted in increased BBB permeability, suggesting that GRP78 autoantibodies may induce BBB permeability and may contribute to disease activity in some patients.[26] Further research is needed to confirm whether GRP78-IgG has a role in NMOSD pathogenesis.

Role of complement

Complement activation plays an essential part in NMOSD lesion formation.[4] Activation of the classical complement cascade is thought to result from engagement of complement component C1q with AQP4-IgG bound to perivascular astrocyte endfeet.[4] This leads to classical complement cascade activation and membrane attack complex formation.[4]

Nytrova et al. showed that levels of the complement component C3a were higher in patients with NMO than in healthy control subjects and that C3a levels in these patients also correlated with disease activity, neurologic disability, and AQP4-IgG.[27]

Recent in vitro studies have identified alternative complement pathways, such as the bystander mechanism, where, following AQP4-IgG binding to astrocyte AQP4, activated, soluble complement proteins were implicated in early oligodendrocyte injury in NMOSD.[28] In addition, complement regulatory protein (CD59) may confer a protective role in AQP4-IgG–seropositive NMOSD tissues outside of the CNS and thus explain why peripheral AQP4-expressing cells in NMOSD remain mostly unaffected.[29]

Relationship between gut microbiota and humoral and cellular immunity

The AQP4 epitope p63-76 displays sequence homology with p204-217 of Clostridium perfringens, a ubiquitous Gram-positive bacterium found in the human gut.[30] This observation provided new perspectives for investigating NMOSD pathogenesis. Gut microbiome analysis of patients with NMO identified an overabundance of C. perfringens.[30] Because specific gut clostridia can regulate Treg and Th17 cell balance,[31] an excess of C. perfringens could theoretically evoke proinflammatory AQP4-specific T- and B-cell responses driving NMOSD development. C. perfringens may also enhance Th17 differentiation by promoting the secretion of IL-6 by antigen-presenting cells in the gut.[30]

Pathophysiologic role of IL-6

IL-6 levels are associated with key NMOSD disease markers.[32,33] Studies have shown that CSF and serum levels of IL-6 correlate with CSF cell counts and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (table 2).[33-39] CSF levels of IL-6 are shown to correlate with AQP4-IgG levels and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels, an indicator of astrocyte damage.[34] CSF and serum IL-6 concentrations are significantly elevated in patients with NMOSD and are higher than in healthy individuals and patients with MS or other noninflammatory neurologic disorders.[34-37] In 1 study, an IL-6 CSF concentration of 7.8 pg/mL was proposed as an optimal cutoff value for diagnosing NMOSD.[32] Furthermore, CSF IL-6 levels are also significantly elevated in the acute phase of NMOSD compared with MS, myelitis, ON, and other inflammatory and noninflammatory neurologic disorders.[40] IL-6 levels may be indicative of NMOSD relapse because IL-6 serum and CSF concentrations in patients with NMOSD are significantly higher during relapse than in periods of remission.[36,38]

Table 2

Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) of the association among IL-6 levels, CSF cell count, and disability

Barros et al. also demonstrated a relationship between serum IL-6 levels with occurrence of clinical relapses in patients with NMO.[38] Furthermore, during a 2-year disease follow-up in these patients, baseline IL-6 levels correlated with the risk of clinical relapses and severity. An 8-fold increase in relapse risk was observed in patients with IL-6 serum concentrations above the baseline median value of 58.5 pg/mL during remissions.[38]

Higher IL-6 levels are also associated with greater disability in NMOSD following relapse. One study evaluated recovery from relapse-related impairment in patients with NMOSD and demonstrated that patients with NMOSD and higher CSF IL-6 levels experienced more modest improvements than did patients with lower IL-6 levels.[41] Furthermore, elevated IL-6 levels have been linked with short relapse-free durations in NMOSD after relapse. Uzawa et al.[41] evaluated the relapse-free duration after relapse in patients with NMOSD and found that patients with high CSF IL-6 levels tended to have shorter relapse-free durations than did those with low IL-6 levels following relapse (p = 0.079).

Effect of IL-6 on B cells

B cells appear to have a central proinflammatory role in NMOSD immunopathology.[19] This is mediated through several proposed mechanisms, including production of AQP4-IgG, antigen presentation, increased B-cell and plasmablast activity, and reduced regulatory function of B cells.[19]

IL-6 was originally identified as B cell stimulatory factor-2, which induced activated B cells into antibody-producing cells.[7] Indeed, circulating short-lived, CD19intCD27high CD38highCD180− plasmablasts may be increased in the peripheral blood of some patients with NMOSD and are capable of producing AQP4-IgG when stimulated with IL-6.[42] However, these activated antibody-secreting cells may not play a major part in the maintenance of circulating serum AQP4-IgG. Detailed molecular studies have demonstrated that AQP4-specific, peripheral blood B cells in the CD27+ classical and CD27− IgD memory compartments show the closest lineal relationship to AQP4-IgG–secreting cells in the CSF.[43] In addition, human cell culture experiments showed that AQP4-IgG–secreting cells were readily generated from pregerminal center–naive and postgerminal center memory B cells, but not the circulating plasmablast compartment. IL-6R blockade may act indirectly to modulate AQP4-IgG production and relapse risk through its effects on T-cell development.[44] Further immunologic studies of serum AQP4-IgG titers and circulating B-cell profiles via T-cell development in patients with NMOSD receiving IL-6R inhibitors are needed.

Effect of IL-6 on T cells

Naive T cells are differentiated into Th17 cells through the combination of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), IL-6, and IL-23.[45] Th17 cells mediate disruption of the BBB and subsequent CNS inflammation.[45] Levels of Th17-related cytokines, IL-17, IL-21, and IL-23 are increased in NMOSD, as is the level of IL-6, particularly in AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients with NMOSD.[46] AQP4-specific T cells in AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients with NMO exhibit Th17 polarization.[47] In addition, levels of Th17-related cytokines, including IL-6, are significantly elevated in the CSF and peripheral blood of patients with NMOSD during relapse.[34] The release of IL-6 and other Th17-related cytokines by activated T lymphocytes from patients with NMOSD was also found to directly correlate with neurologic disability and risk of relapse.[34,38]

Effect of IL-6 in the BBB

Proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, increase the permeability of the BBB allowing antibodies and proinflammatory cells to infiltrate the CNS, leading to binding of AQP4-IgG to AQP4 channels on the astrocytes. In response to stimulation by proinflammatory cytokines, astrocytes produce IL-6, which promotes demyelination and contributes to oligodendrocyte and axon damage (figure A). In vitro BBB models, including cocultures of human brain microvascular endothelial cells and human astrocyte cell lines with or without AQP4 expression, showed that AQP4-IgG induced IL-6 production by AQP4-positive astrocytes, and IL-6 signaling to endothelial cells impaired BBB function, increased production of other chemokines, and enhanced flow-based leukocyte transmigration.[48] These effects were reversed with an IL-6R-neutralizing antibody.[48]

MOG-IgG-seropositive patients and IL-6

MOG is a glycoprotein localized on the surface of the myelin sheath and represents a potential target for the treatment of demyelinating diseases. Mice immunized with MOG peptides may develop experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with an NMO phenotype. MOG-IgG is found in a subset of patients with optic neuritis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis/multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis, myelitis, AQP4-IgG–seronegative NMOSD, or encephalitis.[49] Although MOG-IgG–seropositive and AQP4-IgG–seropositive NMOSD share a similar serum and CSF cytokine profile characterized by the coordinated upregulation of multiple cytokines, especially Th17-related, these diseases have different pathologies.[50] AQP4-IgG–seropositive NMOSD is primarily an astrocytopathic disease, whereas MOG-IgG–seropositive NMOSD is a demyelinating disease.[50]

Therapeutic approaches

Current clinical practice involves treatment of exacerbations with high-dose corticosteroids, apheresis therapies, and off-label use of immunotherapies for relapse prevention, particularly with azathioprine, methotrexate, and prednisone (immunosuppressants); mycophenolate mofetil (inhibits lymphocyte proliferation); anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; and anti–IL-6R monoclonal antibody. Until recently, NMO/NMOSD treatment studies were mostly retrospective.

There is a need for alternative therapeutic options for patients with NMOSD who do not respond to first-line therapy and for treatments that manage other manifestations of the disease, including pain and fatigue. Different therapeutic targets have been investigated in international randomized controlled trials. These include monoclonal antibodies targeting the B-cell antigen CD19 (inebilizumab),[51] CD20 (rituximab), the complement component 5 (eculizumab),[52] and IL-6R (satralizumab).[53]

IL-6 blockade in the treatment of NMOSD

Targeting the IL-6 signaling pathway inhibits both the humoral immune response as well as T-cell pathway and dysfunction of the BBB, providing a comprehensive treatment for the different NMOSD manifestations. Several case reports showed decreased relapse rate and reduced neurologic disability following off-label treatment with an anti-IL-6R antibody in patients with NMOSD (table 1).[54-59]

Araki et al.[56] reported that the mean (standard error of the mean [SEM]) ARR decreased from 2.9 (1.1) to 0.4 (0.8; p < 0.005) and mean EDSS scores (SEM, range) from 5.1 (1.7, 3.0–6.5) to 4.1 (1.6, 2.0–6.0), following 12-month treatment with an anti–IL-6R antibody as add-on therapy to either prednisolone or immunosuppressants in 7 patients with NMOSD. In the same report, mean (SEM) pain decreased from 3.0 (1.5) at baseline to 0.9 (1.2) at 12 months, and mean (SEM) general fatigue decreased from 6.1 (2.0) at baseline to 3.0 (1.4) at 12 months, respectively. Adverse events in this report included upper respiratory infections (2 patients), acute enterocolitis (2 patients), acute pyelonephritis (1 patient), leukocytopenia and/or lymphocytopenia (3 patients), anemia (2 patients), and a slight decline in systolic blood pressure (1 patient). However, none of the events were severe.

Ringelstein et al.[54] reported that patients with NMOSD who were not responsive to rituximab and other immunosuppressants experienced significant improvements in the median ARR (from 4.0 at baseline to 0.4 at the end of the study, p = 0.008), EDSS score (from 7.3 at baseline to 5.5 at the end of the study, p = 0.03), and pain scores (from 6.5 at baseline to 2.5 at the end of the study, p = 0.02) following treatment with an anti–IL-6R antibody. No major adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were reported except for elevation of cholesterol levels in 6 patients and neutropenia in 1 patient.[54] Similarly, Ayzenberg et al. reported that 3 AQP4-positive female patients with NMO and a history of treatment with rituximab and other immunosuppressive and immunomodulating agents experienced a reduction in median ARR (from 3.0 at baseline to 0.6 at the end of the study), but not in impairment scores after switching to an anti–IL-6R antibody.[58] There was no serious infection, malignancy, hypersensitivity reaction, or elevation of transaminase levels. One patient experienced urinary tract infection in the fourth month and mild oral mycosis in the seventh month of therapy.[58]

Harmel et al.[60] reported favorable outcomes following treatment with an anti–IL-6R antibody after inadequate response to interferon-β therapy in a patient misdiagnosed with MS. Under interferon-β treatment, the patient showed persisting relapse activity. Treatment with rituximab was initiated, but severe LETM attacks occurred shortly after. Following switch to an anti-IL-6R antibody, the patient experienced no further relapses for the following 12 months. Other single patient reports included no adverse events during treatment.

Satralizumab is a novel, humanized IgG2 recycling monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6R. It has been investigated in 2 phase 3 studies for the treatment of NMOSD.[53,61] Both results from the monotherapy trial (no other chronic baseline immunosuppression allowed) and data from the add-on to other immunosuppressive therapy trial were recently published.[53,61] Satralizumab as an add-on to baseline treatment significantly reduced the risk of protocol-defined relapse by 62% vs placebo; hazard ratio (HR) 0.38; 95% CI 0.16–0.88; p = 0.02. Prespecified additional analyses showed a 79% relapse risk reduction with satralizumab vs placebo in AQP4-IgG–seropositive patients (n = 55; HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.75) and 34% in AQP4-IgG–seronegative patients (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.20–2.24). In the overall study population, the ARR was 0.11 (95% CI 0.05–0.21) when treated with satralizumab vs 0.32 (95% CI 0.19–0.51) with placebo. There were no deaths or anaphylactic reactions in either group during the double-blind period. The rate of serious adverse events and infections did not differ between the satralizumab and placebo groups (table 3).[53] The results of the monotherapy trial were similar to the results of the add-on therapy trial (table 3).[61] These results further support an important role of IL-6 in NMOSD pathophysiology.

Table 3

Summary of phase 3, add-on therapy and monotherapy clinical trial of satralizumab in NMOSD

Summary and future directions

NMOSD is recognized as a B- and T-cell–mediated immune disease. IL-6 appears to have a key role in the immune response by stimulating antibody production in B cells and the development of effector T cells, by disruption of BBB function, and by regulating the balance between Th17 and Treg cells. Inhibition of IL-6 activity was shown to be effective in 2 phase 3 clinical trials, particularly in AQP4-IgG–seropositive individuals, and represents a promising emerging therapy for the management of NMOSD.