Literature DB >> 31774956

Trial of Satralizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Takashi Yamamura1, Ingo Kleiter1, Kazuo Fujihara1, Jacqueline Palace1, Benjamin Greenberg1, Beata Zakrzewska-Pniewska1, Francesco Patti1, Ching-Piao Tsai1, Albert Saiz1, Hayato Yamazaki1, Yuichi Kawata1, Padraig Wright1, Jerome De Seze1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system and is associated with autoantibodies to anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) in approximately two thirds of patients. Interleukin-6 is involved in the pathogenesis of the disorder. Satralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor. The efficacy of satralizumab added to immunosuppressant treatment in patients with NMOSD is unclear.
METHODS: In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with NMOSD who were seropositive or seronegative for AQP4-IgG to receive either satralizumab, at a dose of 120 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter, added to stable immunosuppressant treatment. The primary end point was the first protocol-defined relapse in a time-to-event analysis. Key secondary end points were the change from baseline to week 24 in the visual-analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more pain) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score (range, 0 to 52, with lower scores indicating more fatigue). Safety was also assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were enrolled, with 41 assigned to the satralizumab group and 42 to the placebo group. The median treatment duration with satralizumab in the double-blind period was 107.4 weeks. Relapse occurred in 8 patients (20%) receiving satralizumab and in 18 (43%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.88). Multiple imputation for censored data resulted in hazard ratios ranging from 0.34 to 0.44 (with corresponding P values of 0.01 to 0.04). Among 55 AQP4-IgG-seropositive patients, relapse occurred in 11% of those in the satralizumab group and in 43% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.75); among 28 AQP4-IgG-seronegative patients, relapse occurred in 36% and 43%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.24). The between-group difference in the change in the mean VAS pain score was 4.08 (95% CI, -8.44 to 16.61); the between-group difference in the change in the mean FACIT-F score was -3.10 (95% CI, -8.38 to 2.18). The rates of serious adverse events and infections did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NMOSD, satralizumab added to immunosuppressant treatment led to a lower risk of relapse than placebo but did not differ from placebo in its effect on pain or fatigue. (Funded by Chugai Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02028884.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31774956     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  98 in total

Review 1.  Antibodies to watch in 2021.

Authors:  Hélène Kaplon; Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  New progress in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with monoclonal antibodies (Review).

Authors:  Qinfang Xie; Mengjiao Sun; Jing Sun; Ting Zheng; Manxia Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Current understanding of the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of optic neuritis.

Authors:  Masanori Nakazawa; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  [Aquaporin 4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis. A brief review].

Authors:  Sven Jarius; Brigitte Wildemann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Emerging therapeutic targets for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Lukmanee Tradtrantip; Nithi Asavapanumas; Alan S Verkman
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.902

6.  Outcomes and future directions for neuroimmunology/multiple sclerosis fellowship training: Survey of recent trainees.

Authors:  Le H Hua; Ahmed Z Obeidat; Erin E Longbrake
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.339

7.  Blood-brain barrier resealing in neuromyelitis optica occurs independently of astrocyte regeneration.

Authors:  Anne Winkler; Claudia Wrzos; Michael Haberl; Marie-Theres Weil; Ming Gao; Wiebke Möbius; Francesca Odoardi; Dietmar R Thal; Mayland Chang; Ghislain Opdenakker; Jeffrey L Bennett; Stefan Nessler; Christine Stadelmann
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Microglia complement astrocytes in neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Zahra Moinfar; Scott S Zamvil
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 9.  Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) and Connective Tissue Disease (CTD): an Update for the Rheumatologist.

Authors:  Roberto A Cruz; Sana Chaudhary; Myriam Guevara; Ethan Meltzer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Emerging Targeted Therapies for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Cristina Valencia-Sanchez; Dean M Wingerchuk
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.