Literature DB >> 32812104

The Virtual Scientific Sessions from the American Society of Breast Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Henry M Kuerer1,2, Sarah L Blair3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32812104      PMCID: PMC7433665          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08946-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
Suddenly, the world entirely changed and everything we knew and were used to also had to change, including in-person national meetings. The pandemic did not allow for a safe 21st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons to take place, scheduled for Las Vegas, Nevada. The one thing that did not change was the member drive for knowledge to advance breast care and decrease the burden of breast cancer for our patients all around the world. Another thing that did not change was the executive physician and staff leadership that rapidly turned our scientific sessions as oral presentations into the new normal of virtual meetings and allowed for presentation of the posters on our website. This historic year for our world and our society renewed our commitment to helping attendees elevate standard practice by improving the efficacy, safety, and quality of breast care for our patients and sharing the best of these advancements in this year’s breast issue of the Annals of Surgical Oncology. Much gratitude is given to the 33 members of the Publication Committee for careful review of 372 research abstracts for selection of the top studies for oral scientific, ‘quick-shot’, and poster presentations, and final review and selection of the highest impact publications for this issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology. Just some of the highlighted research studies published in this issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology include pivotal and essential work regarding enhanced patient recovery and decreasing the use of opioid prescriptions for pain management after breast cancer surgery,1–4 understanding and further integration of neoadjuvant systemic (including hormonal) therapies to facilitate improved patient outcomes,5–9 and further elucidation and updates on breast reconstruction and standardizing oncoplastic surgery.10–14 The annual Outstanding Scientific Presentation Award for the best abstract presented by a resident, medical trainee, or fellow went to Dr. Daniel Lustig for his important work on development of a risk calculator to predict a low risk for malignancy upgrade when atypical ductal hyperplasia is diagnosed by image-guided biopsy, in order to identify patients most likely to benefit from surgical excisons.15 The George Peter’s Award for the best presentation by a fellow went to Dr. Britany Murphy for her work on emerging multi-gene panel testing and performance of contralateral prophylactic masectomy.16 These and other ASBrS articles published in this issue16–31 provide current research results germane to today’s delivery of high-quality breast cancer care. The pandemic is currently still active and the future ramifications of delayed and canceled screening, surgeries, and marked increases in neoadjuvant systemic therapy use for breast cancer will be evaluated in research studies for years to come. The impact on these dramatic changes in breast and other malignancies with respect to recurrence, survival, and emotional well-being will also be the subject of future research presentations at this society and others. In the final analysis, it is anticipated that there will be lessons learned and these practices will be incorporated into continuing enhanced standards in breast cancer care and global healthcare in general.
  31 in total

1.  Development and Prospective Validation of a Risk Calculator That Predicts a Low Risk Cohort for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Upstaging to Malignancy: Evidence for a Watch and Wait Strategy of a High-Risk Lesion.

Authors:  Daniel Ben Lustig; Michael Guo; Claire Liu; Rebecca Warburton; Carol K Dingee; Jin-Si Pao; Urve Kuusk; Leo Chen; Elaine C McKevitt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Differences in Re-excision Rates for Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Intraoperative 2D Versus 3D Tomosynthesis Specimen Radiograph.

Authors:  Natalia Partain; Carissia Calvo; Ali Mokdad; Andrea Colton; Katherine Pouns; Edward Clifford; Deborah Farr; James Huth; Rachel Wooldridge; A Marilyn Leitch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Performance and Clinical Utility of Models Predicting Eradication of Nodal Disease in Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Tumor Biology.

Authors:  John Davis; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; Mark Wickre; Mara A Piltin; Abigail S Caudle; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers Have Distinct Characteristics and Survival.

Authors:  Christine Dauphine; Ashkan Moazzez; Jasmin C Neal; Rowan T Chlebowski; Junko Ozao-Choy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Early Free Range-of-Motion Upper Limb Exercises After Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction Are Safe and Beneficial: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Samantha Karlla Lopes de Almeida Rizzi; Cinira Assad Simão Haddad; Patrícia Santolia Giron; Patrícia Vieira Guedes Figueira; Amanda Estevão; Simone Elias; Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário; Gil Facina
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Undergo Multigene Panel Testing.

Authors:  Brittany L Murphy; Min Yi; Banu K Arun; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Has Breast Surgery Shattered the Glass Ceiling? Trends in Female Representation at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2009-2019.

Authors:  Jenny H Chang; Aida Abou-Zamzam; Sarah Lee; Hannah Choi; Nikita Kadakia; Sarah Lee; Luis Olmedo; Laurel Nelms; Cyrus Nguyen; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Node-Positive Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Be Spared Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Wireless Non-Radioactive Localizers.

Authors:  Alison Laws; Kayla Dillon; Bridget N Kelly; Olga Kantor; Kevin S Hughes; Michele A Gadd; Barbara L Smith; Leslie R Lamb; Michelle Specht
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Obese Patients Who Receive an Opioid-Sparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol are at Increased Risk of Persistent Pain After Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Claudya Morin; Munazza Javid; Yamini Patel; Peter Flom; Charusheela Andaz; Donna-Marie Manasseh; Patrick I Borgen; Kristin E Rojas
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Clinicopathological Evaluation of the Potential Anatomic Pathways of Systemic Metastasis from Primary Breast Cancer Suggests an Orderly Spread Through the Regional Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  S David Nathanson; Shravan Leonard-Murali; Charlotte Burmeister; Laura Susick; Patricia Baker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Clinical Management Perspectives and Potential Consequences of Infection.

Authors:  Justin M Brown; Marie-Claire D Wasson; Paola Marcato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Surgery Fellowships.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin U Friedrich; Joseph A DiComo; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2021-10-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.