Alison Laws1, Kayla Dillon1, Bridget N Kelly1, Olga Kantor1, Kevin S Hughes1, Michele A Gadd1, Barbara L Smith1, Leslie R Lamb2, Michelle Specht3. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mspecht@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and excision of a biopsy-proven node marked by a clip. This study evaluates the feasibility of non-radioactive wireless localizers for targeted excision of clipped axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: We identified biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and TAD from 2016 to 2020, and included those with a clipped node localized using SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, or RFID Tag. Primary outcome measures were (1) successful localization (ultrasound or mammographic-guided placement < 10 mm from target), and (2) retrieval of the clipped node during TAD, documented by specimen radiography or gross visualization. Secondary outcomes included rates of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) and complications. RESULTS: Overall, 57 patients were included; 1 (1.8%) patient had no clip visible at the time of localization, and no radiographic confirmation of clip placement at the time of biopsy, and was therefore excluded. In the remaining 56 patients, localization was successful in 53 (94.6%) patients and the clipped node was retrieved during TAD in 51 (91.1%) patients. Twenty-three of 27 (85.2%) ypN0 patients were spared cALND; 3 (11.1%) patients had cALND for failed clipped node retrieval during TAD, and 1 (3.7%) for false-positive frozen section. In patients with TAD alone, the rates of axillary seroma and infection were 20.0% and 8.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Wireless non-radioactive localizers are feasible for axillary localization after NAT, with high success rates of retrieving clipped nodes. The lack of signal decay is an advantage of these devices, allowing flexibility in timing of placement.
BACKGROUND: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and excision of a biopsy-proven node marked by a clip. This study evaluates the feasibility of non-radioactive wireless localizers for targeted excision of clipped axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: We identified biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancerpatients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and TAD from 2016 to 2020, and included those with a clipped node localized using SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, or RFID Tag. Primary outcome measures were (1) successful localization (ultrasound or mammographic-guided placement < 10 mm from target), and (2) retrieval of the clipped node during TAD, documented by specimen radiography or gross visualization. Secondary outcomes included rates of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) and complications. RESULTS: Overall, 57 patients were included; 1 (1.8%) patient had no clip visible at the time of localization, and no radiographic confirmation of clip placement at the time of biopsy, and was therefore excluded. In the remaining 56 patients, localization was successful in 53 (94.6%) patients and the clipped node was retrieved during TAD in 51 (91.1%) patients. Twenty-three of 27 (85.2%) ypN0 patients were spared cALND; 3 (11.1%) patients had cALND for failed clipped node retrieval during TAD, and 1 (3.7%) for false-positive frozen section. In patients with TAD alone, the rates of axillary seroma and infection were 20.0% and 8.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Wireless non-radioactive localizers are feasible for axillary localization after NAT, with high success rates of retrieving clipped nodes. The lack of signal decay is an advantage of these devices, allowing flexibility in timing of placement.
Authors: Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Jana de Boniface; Oreste Gentilini; Elmar Stickeler; Steffi Hartmann; Marc Thill; Isabel T Rubio; Rosa Di Micco; Eduard-Alexandru Bonci; Laura Niinikoski; Michalis Kontos; Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak; Michael Hauptmann; Florentia Peintinger; David Pinto; Zoltan Matrai; Dawid Murawa; Geeta Kadayaprath; Lukas Dostalek; Helidon Nina; Petr Krivorotko; Jean-Marc Classe; Ellen Schlichting; Matilda Appelgren; Peter Paluchowski; Christine Solbach; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Thorsten Kühn Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 6.639