Literature DB >> 28734172

Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory.

Kirsten C S Adam1, Edward K Vogel2, Edward Awh3.   

Abstract

There is a consensus that visual working memory (WM) resources are sharply limited, but debate persists regarding the simple question of whether there is a limit to the total number of items that can be stored concurrently. Zhang and Luck (2008) advanced this debate with an analytic procedure that provided strong evidence for random guessing responses, but their findings can also be described by models that deny guessing while asserting a high prevalence of low precision memories. Here, we used a whole report memory procedure in which subjects reported all items in each trial and indicated whether they were guessing with each response. Critically, this procedure allowed us to measure memory performance for all items in each trial. When subjects were asked to remember 6 items, the response error distributions for about 3 out of the 6 items were best fit by a parameter-free guessing model (i.e. a uniform distribution). In addition, subjects' self-reports of guessing precisely tracked the guessing rate estimated with a mixture model. Control experiments determined that guessing behavior was not due to output interference, and that there was still a high prevalence of guessing when subjects were instructed not to guess. Our novel approach yielded evidence that guesses, not low-precision representations, best explain limitations in working memory. These guesses also corroborate a capacity-limited working memory system - we found evidence that subjects are able to report non-zero information for only 3-4 items. Thus, WM capacity is constrained by an item limit that precludes the storage of more than 3-4 individuated feature values.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity limits; Metacognition; Precision; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734172      PMCID: PMC5565211          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Reduced capacity but spared precision and maintenance of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  James M Gold; Britta Hahn; Wei Wei Zhang; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06

2.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Kyle Hardman; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume; Katherine M Clark; Mackenzie A Sunday
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  37 in total

1.  Set size effects on working memory precision are not due to an averaging of slots.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  A Flexible Model of Working Memory.

Authors:  Flora Bouchacourt; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Working Memory: Flexible but Finite.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory.

Authors:  Dominic Standage; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacity-unlimited working memory.

Authors:  Steven Gross
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Theories of Working Memory: Differences in Definition, Degree of Modularity, Role of Attention, and Purpose.

Authors:  Eryn J Adams; Anh T Nguyen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Tone series and the nature of working memory capacity development.

Authors:  Katherine M Clark; Kyle O Hardman; Todd R Schachtman; J Scott Saults; Bret A Glass; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Megan T deBettencourt; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

9.  Iconic Memories Die a Sudden Death.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19

10.  Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG.

Authors:  Omid Kardan; Kirsten C S Adam; Irida Mance; Nathan W Churchill; Edward K Vogel; Marc G Berman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.