Literature DB >> 32807312

An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.

Jessica A Brown1, Tom Gale1, William Anderst2.   

Abstract

The absence of a standardized method for defining hindfoot bone coordinate systems makes it difficult to compare kinematics results from different research studies. The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and robust procedure for defining anatomical coordinate systems for the talus and calcaneus. Four methods were evaluated based upon their anatomic consistency across subjects, repeatability, and their correspondence to functional axes of rotation. The four systems consisted of: 1) interactively identified bony landmarks, 2) a principal component analysis, 3) automatically identified bony landmarks, and 4) translating the tibial coordinate system to the hindfoot bones. The four systems were evaluated on 40 tali and 40 calcanei. The functional axes of rotation were determined using dynamic biplane radiography to image the hindfoot during gait. Systems 2 and 3 were the most repeatable and consistent due to the lack of operator intervention when defining coordinate systems. None of the coordinate systems corresponded well to functional axes of rotation during gait. System 3 is recommended over System 2 because it more closely mimics established bone angles measured clinically, especially for the calcaneus. This study presents an automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the talus and calcaneus that does not rely on manual placement of markers or fitting of spheres to the bone surfaces which are less reliable due to operator-dependent measurements. Using this automated method will make it easier to compare hindfoot kinematics results across research studies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle kinematics; Dynamic biplane radiography; Hindfoot; Joint coordinate system

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32807312      PMCID: PMC7829040          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  Ankle and subtalar kinematics measured with intracortical pins during the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Anton Arndt; Pär Westblad; Ian Winson; Takeshi Hashimoto; Arne Lundberg
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Effects of footwear on three-dimensional tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during running.

Authors:  Cathryn D Peltz; Jeffrey A Haladik; Scott E Hoffman; Michael McDonald; Nicole L Ramo; George Divine; Matthew Nurse; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment.

Authors:  S J Piazza; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Validation and application of dynamic biplane radiography to study in vivo ankle joint kinematics during high-demand activities.

Authors:  Samuel Pitcairn; Joseph Kromka; MaCalus Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics.

Authors:  Bibo Wang; Koren E Roach; Ashley L Kapron; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Charles L Saltzman; Madeline Singer; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.

Authors:  Richard J de Asla; Lu Wan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  The instantaneous helical axis of the subtalar and talocrural joints: a non-invasive in vivo dynamic study.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Jun Y Lee; Chuck E Spritzer; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The effect of modified Broström-Gould repair for lateral ankle instability on in vivo tibiotalar kinematics.

Authors:  William B Wainright; Charles E Spritzer; Jun Young Lee; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: Sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

Authors:  Shumeng Yang; Stephen P Canton; MaCalus V Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  New anatomical reference systems for the bones of the foot and ankle complex: definitions and exploitation on clinical conditions.

Authors:  Michele Conconi; Alessandro Pompili; Nicola Sancisi; Alberto Leardini; Stefano Durante; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.303

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.