Literature DB >> 25864769

Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics.

Bibo Wang1, Koren E Roach2, Ashley L Kapron3, Niccolo M Fiorentino4, Charles L Saltzman5, Madeline Singer6, Andrew E Anderson7.   

Abstract

The relationship between altered tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics and development of ankle osteoarthritis is unknown, as skin marker motion analysis cannot measure articulations of each joint independently. Here, we quantified the accuracy and demonstrated the feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy (DF) to measure and visualize the three-dimensional articulation (i.e., arthrokinematics) of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Metal beads were implanted in the tibia, talus and calcaneus of two cadavers. Three-dimensional surface models of the cadaver and volunteer bones were reconstructed from computed tomography images. A custom DF system was positioned adjacent to an instrumented treadmill. DF images of the cadavers were acquired during maximal rotation about three axes (dorsal-plantar flexion, inversion-eversion, internal-external rotation) and simulated gait (treadmill at 0.5 and 1.0 m/s). Positions of implanted beads were tracked using dynamic radiostereometric analysis (DRSA). Bead locations were also calculated using model-based markerless tracking (MBT) and compared, along with joint angles and translations, to DRSA results. The mean positional difference between DRSA and MBT for all frames defined bias; standard deviation of the difference defined precision. The volunteer was imaged with DF during treadmill gait. From these movements, joint kinematics and tibiotalar and subtalar bone-to-bone distance were calculated. The mean positional and rotational bias (±standard deviation) of MBT was 0.03±0.35 mm and 0.25±0.81°, respectively. Mean translational and rotational precision was 0.30±0.12 mm and 0.63±0.28°, respectively. With excellent measurement accuracy, DF and MBT may elucidate the kinematic pathways responsible for osteoarthritis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in living subjects.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual fluoroscopy; In vivo; Kinematics; Subtalar joint; Tibiotalar joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25864769      PMCID: PMC6643275          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  20 in total

1.  Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Application of High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy to Study In Vivo Tibiotalar and Subtalar Kinematics in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability and Asymptomatic Control Subjects During Dynamic Activities.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  In Vivo Kinematics of the Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joints in Asymptomatic Subjects: A High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; Bibo Wang; Ashley L Kapron; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Charles L Saltzman; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Ankle strength, muscle size, and adipose content following unilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.

Authors:  Jessica A Brown; Tom Gale; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Bruce A MacWilliams; Konstantinos Karpos; Jennifer Nichols; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Biplanar Videoradiography to Study the Wrist and Distal Radioulnar Joints.

Authors:  Bardiya Akhbari; Amy M Morton; Douglas C Moore; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Validity and Reliability of a Novel Instrument for the Measurement of Subtalar Joint Axis of Rotation.

Authors:  Byong Hun Kim; Sae Yong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.