Literature DB >> 16609963

Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.

Richard J de Asla1, Lu Wan, Harry E Rubash, Guoan Li.   

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of in vivo ankle joint complex (AJC) biomechanics is critical for understanding AJC disease states and for improvement of surgical treatments. This study investigated 6 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) in vivo kinematics of the human AJC using a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique. Five healthy ankles of living subjects were studied during three in vivo activities of the foot, including maximum plantarflexion and dorsiflexion, maximum supination and pronation, and three weight-bearing positions in simulated stance phases of walking. A three-dimensional (3D) computer model of the AJC (including tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneus) was constructed using 3D MR images of the foot. The in vivo AJC position at each selected position of the foot was captured using two orthogonally positioned fluoroscopes. In vivo AJC motion could then be reproduced by coupling the orthogonal images with the 3D AJC model in a virtual dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic system. From maximum dorsiflexion to plantarflexion, the arc of motion of the talocrural joint (47.5 +/- 2.2 degrees) was significantly larger than that of the subtalar joint (3.1 +/- 6.8 degrees). Both joints showed similar degrees of internal-external and inversion-eversion rotation. From maximum supination to pronation, all rotations and translations of the subtalar joint were significantly larger than those of the talocrural joint. From heel strike to midstance, the plantarflexion contribution from the talocrural joint (9.1 +/- 5.3 degrees) was significantly larger than that of the subtalar joint (-0.9 +/- 1.2 degrees). From midstance to toe off, internal rotation and inversion of the subtalar joint (12.3 +/- 8.3 degrees and -10.7 +/- 3.8 degrees, respectively) were significantly larger than those of the talocrural joint (-1.6 +/- 5.9 degrees and -1.7 +/- 2.7 degrees). Strong kinematic coupling between the talocrural and subtalar joints was observed during in vivo AJC activities. The contribution of the talocrural joint to active dorsi-plantarflexion was higher than that of the subtalar joint, whereas the contribution of the subtalar joint to active supination-pronation was higher than that of the talocrural joint. In addition, the talocrural joint demonstrated larger motion during the early part of stance phase while the subtalar joint contributes more motion during the later part of stance phase. The results add quantitative data to an in vivo database of normals that can be used in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the AJC after injuries. Copyright 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16609963     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  30 in total

1.  Multi-rigid image segmentation and registration for the analysis of joint motion from three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yangqiu Hu; William R Ledoux; Michael Fassbind; Eric S Rohr; Bruce J Sangeorzan; David Haynor
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Evaluating foot kinematics using magnetic resonance imaging: from maximum plantar flexion, inversion, and internal rotation to maximum dorsiflexion, eversion, and external rotation.

Authors:  Michael J Fassbind; Eric S Rohr; Yangqiu Hu; David R Haynor; Sorin Siegler; Bruce J Sangeorzan; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Ankle joint mechanics and foot proportions differ between human sprinters and non-sprinters.

Authors:  Josh R Baxter; Thomas A Novack; Herman Van Werkhoven; David R Pennell; Stephen J Piazza
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Lateral ligament repair and reconstruction restore neither contact mechanics of the ankle joint nor motion patterns of the hindfoot.

Authors:  Victor R Prisk; Carl W Imhauser; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; John G Kennedy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Subtalar arthrodesis stabilisation with screws in an angulated configuration is superior to the parallel disposition: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Martin Eichinger; Werner Schmölz; Alexander Brunner; Raul Mayr; Andreas Bölderl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing.

Authors:  Mako Fukano; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  [Medial pain syndrome in patients with total ankle replacement].

Authors:  A Barg; T Suter; L Zwicky; M Knupp; B Hintermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Kevin J Campbell; Katharine J Wilson; Robert F LaPrade; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.